[ROYALKNIGHT]

Which is better? Pokerstars or Fulltilt. Seems like Fulltilt favors USA players more than Pokerstars.

[johnnypockets]

Pokerstars for tourneys and Fulltilt for cash

[PokerQ]

PokerStars for loose players plus 10 deposit and FullTilt for tight players.

[wavesu6410]

Fulltilt and Bodog are the easiest sites to deposit money. So I only play at those two right now.

[jeremythegreat]

i say pokerstars because the have the biggest payouts for the littlest buy ins, plus they have the double or nothing games also, depositing is easy for any site, bodog is the fastest withdrawel,, takes 2 days to get my money

[BGtoine]

Pokerstar have a better design than fulltilt and more speed

[greywind50]

I like Pokerstars. They have it all and 20% payout's on some MTT's isn't bad either

[RackSpastic]

In the past year or so I have begun not to care for Full Tilt or Pokerstars. To retract a bit though, I would definately have to go with Stars. I really dig Stars' software upgrades and increasingly comfortable, exciting, and user-friendly feel. I really dig the black lobby scheme. Besides the fact that Full Tilt's customzation options lack similiar features, my real gripe is with customer service. They have the financial backing to hire live chat and telephone support agents who are available instantly and who speak english if you need them too. And agreed, noone can touch Pstars's tourney and sitngo selection.

[Kindred]

Full Tilt with rake back unless you play an obscene amount and can get supernova on stars.

[realplaya75]

i like fulltilt the most it is easier to deposit money on that pokerstars and the lobby is easier read and always many tournaments available to choose from

[Bogart45]

I like Fulltilt for cash and tourneys, and Stars for SNG's.

[andrew5]

pstars is good bodog i don't like full tilt too much

[pokerdog283]

I like fulltilt it seems to be the fastest and in my opinion ps seems to have even more donks if thats possible!!

[johnnyutah69]

I think fulltilt is better for cash games and pokerstars is better for tourneys. Bodog is the best though.

[snakeeye6789]

i personally think the sngs at pokerstar are better than fulltilt. but ft has good tourneys

[Bigmikesm]

I'd go with stars. Even though I see ALOT of bad beats on Stars.

[TBranch25]

stars and its not even close

[gn2056]

Honsetly Full tilt is fun but i dont take it seriously I very much doubt their random number generator. Plus Stars has so much better selection of games and tourneys then anyone else, Dont get me wrong there are some things i prefer elsewhere but as far as sites available in US Stars is the cadillac.

[Roybaugh]

Poker stars has seemed to be pretty iffy on a lot of tourney's i've played in but full tilt seems to more just and fair with their hands thats what i switched to currently am playing

[donthalfstep]

pokerstars for freerolls . and real cash for fulltilt

[TheProdigy]

If you plan on depositing into Fulltilt, and are a SERIOUS player. You need rakeback. If you plan on playings a lot and grinding, however if you play only a little, don't stay in your bankroll, or are depositing less than $100 rakeback isn't good. Although if you are ever going to be SERIOUS, try to find a rakeback package, Bonus now, after you play enough games usually like 100 rake starts working.

[scruffy mojo]

neither they are both weak the tourney's have 10,000 people and take 3 days and your betting billions by the time your done , full tilt is just as bad. Bodog is the best for money games and tourneys. atleast there you can play 2 or 3 and finish them. plus the connection to the sports book makes the money games nice for real poker players not gamblers