View New Posts
  1. #1

    Default Are these correlated parlays

    Hey guys, i read a bunch on correlated parlays on SBR and i see that most of the talk is about the fav and the over or the dog and the under. If a player bets a team first half and parlays it with the same team for the complete game I would have to say that is a correlate parlay correct. Sorry for the stupid question.

  2. #2

    Default

    Yes.
    Team total 1st half and Team total for the complete game have a high degree of correlation (degree to which one affects the other).
    Books will not accept such wagers.
    1500pts

    SBR WORLD
    POKER CUP
    2nd Place 2012

    CHARITY DONOR
    11/30/2011 $25 donation


  3. #3

    Default

    im not talking about team totals im talking about spread and moneyline bets. For instance if a player wanted to bet the jets moneyline 1st half/ and jets full game moneyline. Would a book accept this bet?

  4. #4

    Default

    I can't imagine a parlay being any more correlated.

    Its like trying to parlay the ML and the spread for a favourite on any given game.

  5. #5

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hockey07 View Post
    im not talking about team totals im talking about spread and moneyline bets. For instance if a player wanted to bet the jets moneyline 1st half/ and jets full game moneyline. Would a book accept this bet?
    No. Again the degree of correlation is too high.

    There are a few markets available to parlay that offer a (small) mathematical advantage to the player. I could tell you what they are but then I would have to kill you.
    Last edited by FourLengthsClear; 01-23-11 at 06:27 PM.
    1500pts

    SBR WORLD
    POKER CUP
    2nd Place 2012

    CHARITY DONOR
    11/30/2011 $25 donation


  7. #7

    Default

    ok perfect. Now what about a team in football, like the packers were today, -3.5. Since its such a small spread would it be considered correlated to the over still? So you can't ever bet the fav ATS and the over in football in a parlay?

Top