[Morality]

Any other books I can join?

[Sunde91]

The answer is clearly no.

[FuzzyDunlop]

How do you get blacklisted?

[Morality]

I did 5k worth of chargebacks

[rm18]

just play in yo momma name

[Domestic]

I did 5k worth of chargebacks

[Justin7]

I did 5k worth of chargebacks

You're blacklisted from a lot more than those 2 then.

[Morality]

You're blacklisted from a lot more than those 2 then.

I know. But after I was blacklisted from bookmaker for doing a $1500 chargeback, I was still able to join 5dimes and even cashout. So I'm just wondering if there are any other independent books out there...

[2Bdown]

Any other books I can join?

not only are you a thief, but a losing one at that. i would recommend sportsbook.com or BetUs for you

[Morality]

not only are you a thief, but a losing one at that. i would recommend sportsbook.com or BetUs for you

Nah, the books are the real thieves

[rm18]

yes sportsbook is a good chargeback book

[Morality]

yes sportsbook is a good chargeback book

How are they with payouts though?

[rm18]

way below average but they still will probably pay you

[sharpcat]

I just wanted to say thanks for making it so difficult for all of us honest players to deposit and withdrawal our money.

Justin7/SBR ban this lowlife!!!

[Morality]

I just wanted to say thanks for making it so difficult for all of us honest players to deposit and withdrawal our money.

Justin7/SBR ban this lowlife!!!

Yes, I'm the lowlife. Not the one with over 2,000 posts this year and doesn't have a life outside of this forum of degenerates

[shaunovery]

You're a fool man

[Trident]

Nah, the books are the real thieves

Would love to hear your reasoning why Books are thieves and why you don't consider yourself one.

[Aristocles]

Yes, I'm the lowlife. Not the one with over 2,000 posts this year and doesn't have a life outside of this forum of degenerates

He is a lifeless degenerate because of his quantity of posts. What would that make someone who is an admitted thief?

Do you really expect people here to advise you based on nothing more than your contempt for their own ethos?

Piss off. . .

[Morality]

Would love to hear your reasoning why Books are thieves and why you don't consider yourself one.

A priori, the overwhelming majority of people will lose money. I'm just getting my hard earned money back.

[Hareeba!]

and he calls himself Morality!

[Aristocles]

A priori, the overwhelming majority of people will lose money. I'm just getting my hard earned money back.

A posteriori.

It is in fact only after losing that one can have knowledge, epistemically speaking.

[Morality]

LMAO. You guys are just pissed that when *I* lost, I got my money back. I'm about to graduate from a top school and have a bright future, you guys are hopeless!!!

[Morality]

A posteriori.

It is in fact only after losing that one can have knowledge, epistemically speaking.

Let's rip out Kant, Hume and Descartes later, shall we?

[Footballtime]

Was it Morality, Or MORONITY! Watch out for Karma, heard its a BITCH!

[clarkj2]

Yet you don't know the meaning of a priori...

[ebbearsfb1]

whats a charge back?

[The Seer]

and he calls himself Morality!

[Morality]

Yet you don't know the meaning of a priori...

Read Kant, learn about analytic vs synthetic a priori you dumbass

[FuzzyDunlop]

You can probably still get an account at this sportsbook

[Aristocles]

Let's rip out Kant, Hume and Descartes later, shall we?

No need. I have stated a fact. It is only after experience not prior to it that one can ascertain something as simple as an empirical fact that losing can and does occur. But it is known a priori. Kant was in no way expressing such. One plays and one wins or one losses. This is seen from experience. You are either ignorant or insane if you the Sage of Königsberg was addressing such. . .

[wtf]

LMAO. You guys are just pissed that when *I* lost, I got my money back. I'm about to graduate from a top school and have a bright future, you guys are hopeless!!!

does this TOP SCHOOL have an ethics course?

guess you were sick that semester

[DrStale]

See pro-lifers, some people clearly should have been aborted.

[Morality]

No need. I have stated a fact. It is only after experience not prior to it that one can ascertain something as simple as an empirical fact that losing can and does occur. But it is known a priori. Kant was in no way expressing such. One plays and one wins or one losses. This is seen from experience. You are either ignorant or insane if you the Sage of Königsberg was addressing such. . .

Math is synthethic a priori, statistics would fall under the same category

[Morality]

See pro-lifers, some people clearly should have been aborted.

5,000+ posts, LMFAO

[Aristocles]

Read Kant, learn about analytic vs synthetic a priori you dumbass

I have. I have read a great portion of Kant's corpus and am more than wiling to discuss.

My degree was in Logic and Philosophy.

The knowledge to which you refer is based on the content of experiences. QED.