[MidasPalace]

I know this is probably no big deal to you, but I still wanted to let you know that someone is making the statement.

--

From: xxxx@aol.com
To: admin@xxxxxxxxxxx.com
Subject: question

i was wondering why aren't you guys on the certified list at safe-sportsbooks.com? They are much better than SBR, and more honest. And they offer me a better sense of security and are one of the best watchdogs on the net


i was thinking about joining to use you guys for horses.
thanks,

Vanessa

p.s.
what type of bonus would i get on a $10,000 neteller deposit?
their website is safe-sportsbooks.com

[tacomax]

Wonder what the odds are that "Vanessa" is a tout for safe-sportsbooks and has sent a similar email to a whole host of sportsbooks?

[Mudcat]

Wonder what the odds are that "Vanessa" is a tout for safe-sportsbooks and has sent a similar email to a whole host of sportsbooks?

Heavy chalk on that.

[Sean]

Extremely humorous …

First, I wonder if “Vanessa” could point out where on this safe-sportsbooks site she found the “Certified List” of books. I see sponsors, but no reviews, research, ratings, news, or any other information aside from sponsored links.

Secondly, if they are so much better than SBR, why did they choose to use SBR Odds as their “Live Lines” feed?

Anyone familiar with Alexa rankings may also be impressed by their traffic rank of 929,765 ... truly a remarkable achievement.

Amazing how this site being operated from some little condo/apartment in Ft. Myers since late August of last year is so much more advanced than our silly little operation.

Kudos to them!

[natrass]

The stupidity of shills is boundless.

Anyone remember zvenn diagrams from school?

Well, lets say Group A is made of female gamblers (yes, they do exist)

Group B is made up of horse racing gamblers who wager over $10,000 and use multiple bookies.

I would guess that the number who are members of both Group A and Group B will be infintesimal. Why didnt the shill dramatically increase any potential credibility by just using a guy's name? They are so stupid they beilieve everybody else is.

Also, love the fact the $10k bonus enquiry is the PS to a mail yapping about a review site.

[isetcap]

Generally (in all instances), I find capital punishment barbaric and offensive and would never support it...

unless it were being applied to "vanessa".

[onlooker]

Im not even going to bother checking out that other site. No need to give it unnecessary traffic.

What a joke.

[SBR_John]

There are a lot of guys trying to get in the industry. About a year ago one of our projects was to scout competition and we cane up with just under 1500 established websites. Its too bad this particular site chooses a dishonest shill method as a promotion method but se la ve.

My advice to this site or any aspiring web site owner is to add more content, better content and unique content.

[turbobets]

Not to give them anymore pub, but this is some funny stuff.

check out their redcross banner

and better yet

their live lines

...3rd times a charm?

[turbobets]

brick

did u even bother to check the links i posted????

please respond

[turbobets]

no i was talkin about your posting name.

make that 4, thanks brick!

I don't post often, only when I think can contribute something useful or this case amusing.

[pags11]

with all due respect to TOW and anyone else out there, SBR is the best by far...

[turbobets]

with all due respect to TOW and anyone else out there, SBR is the best by far...

agreed...SBR is one of the few sites I actually consider a watchdog

[onlooker]

brick

did u even bother to check the links i posted????

please respond

I did the live line link, before I edited it out. Looked to me that they were using the SBRlines. Sean had mentioned that above as well.

[Santo]

but se la ve.

That's c'est la vie John.. more french lessons I feel ;-)

[SBR_John]

Yea ya know I was at this French resturant last week and I asked what the Soup De ja vu was?? Heck I might as well of been speaking spanish(which I butcher just the same ).