Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jack Schitt
Hummmm
Wierd, hard to believe that one employee, or in this case a past employee can lower a sportsbook rating.
|
I don't find that hard to believe at all. I'm not directly involved in SBR's ratings but if I was, and a sportsbook had a scammer working in a position of influence, I would factor it into the rating BIG TIME.
It sounds like you are saying he has left - which is good - but it still leaves question marks hanging over the operation for me (I mean unless the entire ownership has turned over.) I don't have a lot more confidence in an owner who was okay with employing a STIFF than the STIFF himself.
I have seen almost no feedback on any forums about other aspects of this sportsbook's performance. This thread is just about it.
Based on the available evidence, "D" sounds like a proper rating to me, at least for now.