[potsie]

Now that I have already loaded up on my selection I can freely share. Take the Red Wings -1.5 +125...the easiest money out there. There is absolutely no way that Pittsburgh takes this game.

I am 30-19 for the NHL playoffs

[j$]

Can we get Betplom in here for discussion

[mathdotcom]

I am also on -0.5 -139 for regulation time.

[mathdotcom]

I see it's now -155 or so! No way I am scalping this baby

[element1286]

The Wings -1.5 is the only logical bet for tonight. I would never lay -270 for a hockey game. I doubt the Wings win by one anyway, they will either lose (I hope so) or win by more than one. I don't have read on the over/under.

[betplom]

Can we get Betplom in here for discussion

I like the play Det -1.5 myself.

Why?

Pittsburgh is spent, emotionally and physically, young immature team that had it too easy in the early part of the playoffs.

Pitt ABSOLUTELY MUST score first to have any hope of winning tonight, they will not be able to comeback from a deficit to win in Detroit. I've mentioned many times that I'm not a fan of Pens goalie Fleury, he lets in too many soft ones.

My gut feeling is Detroit by at least two goals. They are obviously better, play intelligent disciplined hockey and will have a very loud home crowd to watch them receive their well earned reward, THE STANLEY CUP!

[Thor4140]

Under

Dude you need to get some of that stuff out of your post. Its a nightmare to read. Do you really need two quotes from separate people with your signature stuff?

[potsie]

I am also on -0.5 -139 for regulation time.

This is also a smart play...at -155 I wouldn't recommend it but at -139 I'd take it. Lots of books don't offer the -0.5 though. Good luck!

[stevek173]

I took it at -280, but I like locks.

[flyingillini]

I took the under huge. I am sure I will lose this bet though. Anytime I bet an amount that I have no business betting I lose.

[potsie]

Under is locked up. I tried telling everyone, only a few listened.

I hate taking NHL games under 5 flat. If each team scores just twice...you don't win. Another likely scenario is the Wings winning 3-1 or 3-2 and hitting an empty netter. It very well could be under, but I personally don't take the under 5, especially with two of the strongest O's in the game. Good luck though!

[potsie]

Wow, Detroit carrying the play but losing 2-0. Kronwall just scored on his own net after Osgood made the save. They'll come back though! If they win by two the 'under' is shot.

[j$]

2-0 Pens ...Wings win in OT

[crisp]

threads that start off with "there is absolutely no way a team loses" and end with "easy money" are usually fade material. now the wings have to score 4 goals to cover that -1.5. not so easy is it?

[j$]

Get set for this 4-3 victory from Detroit

[donjuan]

under still solid my friend

If you want more of the under I'd be happy to give you more.

[j$]

There we go boys Wings will win 2-1

[j$]

Iwin the under is toast my friend toast

[crisp]

i'm glad the wings broke the ice. no pun intended.

[j$]

I dont care Im on wings thats all I really care about ..here...Wings 3-2 ..U push ...better

[donjuan]

how u feelin now

Like it was a bet that had +EV at the time of my post.

[j$]

whoooo2-2

[potsie]

Wings are now up 3-2 Woot woot!!!

[potsie]

Crosby going in 1 on 5...that's why Pitt loses.

[j$]

chalk up another one for j$ whooooooo 3-2...

[potsie]

I hate taking NHL games under 5 flat. If each team scores just twice...you don't win.

See what I'm saying?

[stevek173]

Special K's got it. Det str8 up, minus an obnoxious 280...book it. Fun stuff.

[stevek173]

Crosby going in 1 on 5...that's why Pitt loses.

Well said sir IMO.

[stevek173]

I'd "Edit posts" but that wouldn't be very many would it .

[potsie]

Wow, a great game, but we all lost (except for the ML play) Zetterberg almost had an empty net chance but didn't have enough gas in the tank. Can't see the Wings losing in OT as they have dominated the play if not the score. Painful loss on the -1.5 though...still cheering for Detroit though.