View New Posts
  1. #1

    Default Max Scherzer tonight....future Cy Young winner?

    He probably won't remain in the rotation long this season, but one would have to believe he wins the job easily by next season.

    This guy is the real deal.

    Enjoy watching him pitch tonight!

  2. #2

  3. #3

    Default

    Me too.

    He was dominant in his last relief outing. DOMINANT!

  4. #4

    Default

    4 and a third is good enough for me!!!! cy young!!!~!@!@!@!@!

    Philadelphia Phillies
    J. Moyer
    2.30
    J. Moyer must start

  5. #5

    Default

    Kid is grossly overpriced here though. I got Phils at +134.

  6. #6

    Default

    HOLY SH!T! Phils are mow +148!

    I obviously didn't see this coming. Damn. I'd still take the win at 134 though (not that I have a choice.)

  7. #7

    Default

    ** - If he does well he'll definitely stick in the rotation this year. Johnson or Edgar Gonzales will be the odd man out.

    Long term though, he could develop arm problems. No one lasts long throwing 98 with a hard slider.

    LT I think the kid is grossly underpriced here. If I had a bet on Philly right now, I'd bet out of it and take Arizona, even if it wound up giving me a -180 line on Arizona or something.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The HG View Post
    ** - If he does well he'll definitely stick in the rotation this year. Johnson or Edgar Gonzales will be the odd man out.

    Long term though, he could develop arm problems. No one lasts long throwing 98 with a hard slider.

    LT I think the kid is grossly underpriced here. If I had a bet on Philly right now, I'd bet out of it and take Arizona, even if it wound up giving me a -180 line on Arizona or something.
    Based on what? FOUR career innings? Let him prove something at the MLB level before laying ANY wood with him, let alone the -158 he is now.

  9. #9

    Default

    cant bet on moyer and his 23.6 LD% against a team 2nd in the big in scoring. Young, Reynolds, Byrnes, and Jackson have all had success against him, though Eric is the only one with many ABs to look at. Scherzer's not going to be facing a lineup thats hitting well, philly seems to need the HR to score and Scherzer doesn't give up HRs.

  10. #10

    Default

    Those would be valid points if Arizona was an underdog. But I don't lay this kind of chalk with proven veterans, so I cetainly can't do it with a guy making his first start. So Phils are the value play just on principle alone.

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    Those would be valid points if Arizona was an underdog. But I don't lay this kind of chalk with proven veterans, so I cetainly can't do it with a guy making his first start. So Phils are the value play just on principle alone.
    imo starters have the advantage in their first few starts. max struggled with his control some in his stint at AA in 07, but thats the only time he was troubled by walks over his limited minor league career. a strike out pitcher helps his chances of winning more than most, and a guy who dominated in his first outing with 83% Fastballs is obviously someone with overwhelming stuff. Better pitcher, better lineup, better bullpen. AZ bats over .300 as a team at home and the only thing they truly struggle with is strike outs...moyer aint a strike out pitcher..


  12. #12

    Default

    Mo, you make no mention about PRICE, which is what it is all about.

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    Mo, you make no mention about PRICE, which is what it is all about.

    I think the price is about right and those are my reasons. I would consider philly if i could get something closer to +170. However...



  14. #14

    Default

    Agree to disagree. NO pitcher should be more than -125 in his first MLB start. If I recall, Lincecum was a home dog in his first start, and he got hit pretty hard too.

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    Based on what? FOUR career innings? Let him prove something at the MLB level before laying ANY wood with him, let alone the -158 he is now.
    No, based on minor league performance and reports as well. The Arizona line is not just for him, it's for the whole team as well. Obviously if he were starting for Pittsburgh on the road at LA or something like that it would be a different story.

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    Agree to disagree. NO pitcher should be more than -125 in his first MLB start. If I recall, Lincecum was a home dog in his first start, and he got hit pretty hard too.

    We shall.

    Now, what was prior in his first start? In this instance we have someone starting for the first time, but he is doing so for the best team in baseball. Last years Giants and this years Dbacks have little in common.


    Lincecums first start was against the phillies. He went 4.1, allowed 5 hits, 5 walks, amd had 5 Ks. He allowed 6GB, 4 FB, and 2LD in 100 pitches (53 strikes 47 balls). Tim got a no decision.

  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    If I recall, Lincecum was a home dog in his first start, and he got hit pretty hard too.
    Lincecum was matched up against Hamels in his first start. Unless Moyer miraculously awoke with 20mph added to his fastball, he's no Hamels. Also, the D-Backs hammer lefties. This line is as much about Moyer as it is Scherzer. It wouldn't surprise me if Moyer was out of baseball come July.
    400pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/17/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/24/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/28/2012

    275pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY3rd Place 5/28/2012

    50pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY14th Place 5/25/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/17/2012

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Store 05/05/2012

    200pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/29/2012

    200pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/22/2012


  18. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rjt721 View Post
    Lincecum was matched up against Hamels in his first start. Unless Moyer miraculously awoke with 20mph added to his fastball, he's no Hamels.
    and a change that disappears. remember when he threw bonds 4 straight change ups and struck him out? that was one of my favorite memories from a season ago.

  19. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mofome View Post
    and a change that disappears. remember when he threw bonds 4 straight change ups and struck him out? that was one of my favorite memories from a season ago.
    Hamels is a bad man, no doubt.
    400pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/17/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/24/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/28/2012

    275pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY3rd Place 5/28/2012

    50pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY14th Place 5/25/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/17/2012

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Store 05/05/2012

    200pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/29/2012

    200pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/22/2012


  20. #20

    Default

    If the guy wants to win the Cy Young, he better move to the AL - Tim Lincecum is a lock for the NL award for the next 7 years.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  21. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rjt721 View Post
    It wouldn't surprise me if Moyer was out of baseball come July.

    Now let's not dis Jamie Moyer too much, his fluff can produce competitive, out-getting starts.

    But I think even in the -150s, Arizona is a good bet. Again if I had Philly right now, I would bet out of it, and take Arizona on the other side.

  22. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tacomax View Post
    If the guy wants to win the Cy Young, he better move to the AL - Tim Lincecum is a lock for the NL award for the next 7 years.


    I will give you the same odds $1000 to win a 1,000,000 he does not win it the next 7 years.
    1561pts

    TOP SPORTSBOOK
    WINNER
    05/28/2012

    12,665

    SBR POKER TOP 100

    19th Place 11/1/2011


  23. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    Agree to disagree. NO pitcher should be more than -125 in his first MLB start. If I recall, Lincecum was a home dog in his first start, and he got hit pretty hard too.
    I remember Yovani Gallardo being around -150 or so last year against SF in his first ever start. He got the win....

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  24. #24

    Default

    Also I think Sandy Koufax was something like -220 in his first start, and look how that turned out, so....

  25. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tacomax View Post
    If the guy wants to win the Cy Young, he better move to the AL - Tim Lincecum is a lock for the NL award for the next 7 years.



  26. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    NO pitcher should be more than -125 in his first MLB start.
    I understand what you're saying, LT, but the argument could be made that the advantage lies with Scherzer his first start. Just ask the Astros what it's like seeing his stuff for the first time. Still no Rollins for the Phils, Lidge has worked four consecutive days and won't be available tonight, Moyer's been abused thus far this season and is now facing the second highest scoring team in baseball, a lineup that hits lefties extraordinarily well... all these factors add up to this line being what it is.
    400pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/17/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/24/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/28/2012

    275pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY3rd Place 5/28/2012

    50pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY14th Place 5/25/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/17/2012

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Store 05/05/2012

    200pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/29/2012

    200pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/22/2012


  27. #27

  28. #28

  29. #29

    Default

    Even Moyer is hitting him.
    400pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/17/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/24/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/28/2012

    275pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY3rd Place 5/28/2012

    50pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY14th Place 5/25/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/17/2012

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Store 05/05/2012

    200pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/29/2012

    200pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/22/2012


  30. #30

    Default

    HHahahahahahahah. I was banned up until now, or I would have laughed at you earlier.

    Some guy that no one has ever heard of is not going to win a Cy Young.

  31. #31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mofome View Post
    Just wanted to be part of the board's Lincecum-lovefest.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  32. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 2Pac View Post
    HHahahahahahahah. I was banned up until now, or I would have laughed at you earlier.

    Some guy that no one has ever heard of is not going to win a Cy Young.
    no one has ever heard of??

  33. #33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 2Pac View Post
    HHahahahahahahah. I was banned up until now, or I would have laughed at you earlier.

    Some guy that no one has ever heard of is not going to win a Cy Young.
    You are WE EAT FISH and I claim my $100 Ghostbuster fee.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


Top