[pico]

heading on the road to boston, so tigers will be getting plus money every game of the 3 games series. i am saying there is no way they'll be 0-9. So I am going to use Investor's strategy doing matingale strategy with the boston series.

All I need is 7k bankroll. I am betting 1k on game 1, i'll double up everytime they lose. There is no way there will be a sweep.

Easiest 1k+ (depends on the odds) in the world. I feel pretty smart already. I did learn something from reading Investor's thread...this is a lock.

[diogee]

I would have thought that the Tigers winning at least one game out of their 6 game homestand would have been a lock as well.

[pico]

ok, here is my smart system.

starting bankroll $7000

trade 1, tigers ML game 1 in boston odds: +1XX?

good luck.

[diogee]

Best of luck to you Pico.

[pico]

Best of luck to you Pico.

thanks, i did backtesting using computer simulation on all avaliable data for the tigers. there has not been one instance where they start off the season with 0-6 and got swept on the road following that.

[Arnold]

Couldn't beat KC at home, you think they will beat Boston on the road?

[Deuce]

Couldn't beat KC at home, you think they will beat Boston on the road?

KC is ok this year.

[RescueMe]

tthere has not been one instance where they start off the season with 0-6 and got swept on the road following that.

There is a first time for everything!
Boston coming to home for the first time after bad trip to Toronto and also the having this all "We are the champions" hoopla on top of that tomorrow. so my advance, at least skip the first game!
But GL anyway!

[dannyt76]

GL on your plays this week. I think the Tigers' bats wake up at some point against the Nation. Also you gotta like their chances with their heavy power hitting right handed lineup vs. the short porch Green Monster. Hope you hit one of these. I don't think they get swept here.

[Arnold]

KC is ok this year.

Yes, it's OK for them to finish last again this year.

[Deuce]

Yes, it's OK for them to finish last again this year.

They were 4th in the AL Central last year. I guess you don't know MLB pal.

[Arnold]

They were 4th in the AL Central last year. I guess you don't know MLB pal.

Of course I don't, but mlb.com does.

Then talk about who knows mlb and who doesn't.

[treece]

Tigers are pissing me off. I went big with them last night and awake today to find out they lost by double digits. Now in basketball thats not so bad but in baseball thats god awful. The Red Sox are in a bit of a slump as well but not as bad as the Tigers. I don't think I could bet the Tigers anymore after getting blown out at home with their ace on the mound. You can't have a better situation than that to win.

[jjgold]

I guess Detroit is overrated, a bunch of over paid losers

Shefield a cancer on any team

Pico great strategy with martingale, I knew you were bright.

[mofome]

pico, what if they go 0-2 with a rainout?

[biggamer3]

Wow ballsy, against the Sox anything is possible

Would not use the Martingale here, besides Verlander Tigers have zero good pitchers

[lowbets]

pico, what if they go 0-2 with a rainout?

bahahahhahaa

[bookie]

No reason at all they couldn't get swept again...and even though they will be dogs in all three it's not like there will be a ton of value on them. A lot of bettors will still see them as a great team that's due so they won't be big dogs.

Pico...you gotta rethink this.

[rake922]

Redsox wont sweep

[betplom]

This kind of like the roulette strategy. You bet one color, and keep doubling your bet until you hit. The problem is that you end up betting $500 to chase a $10 investment

Exactly!

[rjt721]

heading on the road to boston, so tigers will be getting plus money every game of the 3 games series. i am saying there is no way they'll be 0-9. So I am going to use Investor's strategy doing matingale strategy with the boston series.

All I need is 7k bankroll. I am betting 1k on game 1, i'll double up everytime they lose. There is no way there will be a sweep.

Easiest 1k+ (depends on the odds) in the world. I feel pretty smart already. I did learn something from reading Investor's thread...this is a lock.

'Smart' sure doesn't mean what it used to.

[pico]

you guys won't believe me, but this is the smartest thing that i can ever dreamed of. how many times has tigers gone 0-6 at the start of the season and got swept by the red sox...none. in the MLB history, there has not been one instance that red sox sweep the tigers following a 0-6 season start. this is the lock of the century. get as much as you can to put on this martingale play. you all can thank me later.

i am telling you, this is the triple full moon lock of the centruy!!!

[pico]

pico, what if they go 0-2 with a rainout?

then save that third play for the reschule date. geez, mofo, what a stupid question.

[imgv94]

had a dream detroit was 0-9

[msubulldog]

never say they can't lose all 3 or 4 whatever they are playing. seems every year some team goes on big losing streak to start season; seems like cubs a few years ago lost something like first 16.

lost 22 straight hands of blackjack about 10 years ago for table mininum of $ 10. thank goodness was not playing big at time, or chaseing as some people do. no it was not one table but 5 different tables.

[pico]

had a dream detroit was 0-9

only loser has loser dreams. i dreamed that detroit sweep the red sox and jesus christ told me that himself...take that.

[purecarnagge]

I'm doing what Iwinyourmoney just said. I started at 5.00 though.

[pico]

IF I TYPE IN ALL CAPS, WOULD YOU GUYS TAKE THIS PICK SERIOUSLY?

[mofome]

then save that third play for the reschule date. geez, mofo, what a stupid question.

ah, but that doesn't actually make any sense with the logic you used in your original theory.

[gizmo2431]

I understand the logic, but the reality of it is that they CAN go 0-9. Nothing is set in stone. As well, this proven system that has been going undefeated was defeated the first week of the season.

http://forum.sbrforum.com/baseball-h...home-team.html

Anything can happen... GLUCK

[pico]

ah, but that doesn't actually make any sense with the logic you used in your original theory.

the streak has a carryover effect. it is advanced quantum physics involving time bending and wormholes.

[mofome]

the streak has a carryover effect. it is advanced quantum physics involving time bending and wormholes.

why didnt you say so in the first place. now i look like the fool...again.

[pico]

why didnt you say so in the first place. now i look like the fool...again.

damn straight...mofool.

btw, you know i am joking about the martingale strategy, right? if you haven't figured out already, it is a parody of Investor's "The Money System"