View New Posts
  1. #1

    Default Player v BigactionPlayer Facts

    The player and the book agree to most of the facts. In May of 2006, the player deposited $20,000 and collected $4000 in bonuses. Over the next 18 months, the player beat the book out of $1,680,000. When the player attempted to cash out in November, the book refused, citing wagering fraud.

    The book alleged that the player was a mover for the Bananno family, which recently was recently the subject of sealed federal indictments. The book further alleged that the player was directly involved in numerous match fixings. It spent in excess of $60,000 on private investigators and produced compelling evidence that there were multiple occurrences of match fixing benefiting the player. In particular, I am convinced that multiple events from the Little League World Series of Baseball, Men's Tennis and Ita "B league" soccer were fixed before they occurred. The player denies he was involved in match fixing, but agrees that they might have been for the purposes of this mediation.

    The player used parlays involving at least 14 different matches that were likely fixed, and won all but one match. One 10-team parlay paid the player $600,000. The player made smaller bets on sides and totals, and was a net loser on events that were not fixed.

    In November, 3 persons appeared in Costa Rica claiming to represent the player. After initially presenting an Ukrainian passport for another of the book's players, the group was admitted. Once inside the sportsbook, they demanded payment of the player's balance. When the book refused, the 3 assaulted several clerks. While 4 employees had minor injuries, one clerk that fought back sustained a fracture to his right wrist and a broken nose (and incurred $8000 in medical expenses). The book accuses the "goon squad" of also wrecking their headquarters. The 3 allegedly destroyed 18 computer monitors, 5 computers, 2 72" flat screen plasma TVs, 12 29" LCD TVs, and most of the furniture in the main office. The book estimates the property damage at $47,000. The player denied that he knew anything about the goon squad in Costa Rica.

    The book had no rules prohibiting match fixing.

    The player wants $1.680m in winnings. The book wants to forfeit his deposit, claiming the player owes $55,000.

    How would you rule on this?

  2. #2

    Default

    wow, justin. you should able to get into harvard law with these crazy dispute resolutions. i have to think about htis a bit...

  3. #3

    Default

    From what you said. there is overwhelming evidence that the player is connected. hehe...this is one of those situation where the bookie is the victim. But they're stupid for refusing to pay out the balance. If they suspect matchfixing, then they should voided the wager after the event, not when the players want a withdraw. So i'd say, they deserve to get the headquarter trashed. the bookie is at fault here. they better pay up, or shut down the operation and hide

  4. #4
    trixtrix's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-13-06
    Posts: 1,855
    Message Me

    Default

    if we can send the player to sbg global and sportsbook.com, i'll diet for a month

  5. #5

    Default

    No clue how to resolve it, but match fixing on the Little League World Series? Are you serious?

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jtuck View Post
    No clue how to resolve it, but match fixing on the Little League World Series? Are you serious?
    give the fat kid a candy bar for striking out

  7. #7

    Default

    Book has to pay. Do books refund players when they bet on the wrong side of fixes or tank jobs?

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/25/2005


  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moses millsap View Post
    Book has to pay. Do books refund players when they bet on the wrong side of fixes or tank jobs?
    only one book...betfair, and it was right after the event

  9. #9

    Default

    You get some real gems lately don't you Justin.

    The one question you have to ask yourself would be... "Would the book refund his money if he loss?"... I think not!

    Did every other one of this books clients that wagered on those "fixed" events get graded accordingly and paid? If so then I feel this gentlemen deserves his money minus the damages and a little bit of compensation for roughing up those workers, however I'm not quite sure what a fair amount would be. But it sure the heck wouldn't be $1,680,000.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  10. #10

    Default

    Within what period of time were the "fixed" winnings accrued? If it's over a prolonged period then the book should have shut him down. The book should certainly have posted parlay limits significantly lower on such events. The player is also insane for allowing the balance to build so significantly.

    I take it the book isn't saying that he exceeded posted payout maximums on parlays.

    That said, there is no precedent amongst professional operations for forfeiting winnings based on fixed games, excepting the Davydenko case cited previously, and as far as I'm aware that was only voided at Betfair. The book should pay ~$1.6m

    SBR Founder Join Date: 9/8/2005


  11. #11

    Default

    i totally agree with santo. both the book and the player are totally unresponsible getting it to this point, the player has such an enormous balance there.

    an important argument of the book deciding not to pay seems to be some of the matches he bet on were fixed according to them. if they are claiming that, they will have to prove that beyond any doubt (which is quite difficult), the simple fact you say you are convinced they were fixed is not enough in my opinion to warrant the books behaviour.
    i know nothing about minor league baseball, but Italian Serie B soccer, that's some serious level of sport you are talking about. any fix in these kinds of matches would have made headlines around the world (especially in europe), I don't remember anything like that coming out in recent years. i'm not saying there were no suspicous matches in these kinds of league (a few examples do come to mind end of last season), but since it was never proven, this info is useless.

    too bad some guys wrecked their office, but, if the book cannot prove a direct link between the player and the three guys, you can't blame it on him. even if they do, the damages are nowhere near the balance he is owed.

    i'm sure the book would love to NOT pay, since that's quite a balance, but I definitely think they should.

    must say though: one of the most colourful disputes you have had over here. reads like an exciting movie
    Last edited by noyb; 04-01-08 at 05:10 AM.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 9/13/2005


  12. #12

  13. #13

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chemist View Post
    Anyone know what day it is?
    hmmm, very good point

    SBR Founder Join Date: 9/13/2005


  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chemist View Post
    Anyone know what day it is?
    Fair point. Interesting thought exercise anyway ;o)

    SBR Founder Join Date: 9/8/2005


  16. #16
    durito's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 07-03-06
    Posts: 13,093
    Message Me

    Default

    BigActionPlayer?

    Is that an offshoot of BigJuicyOdds.


    Fixing a little league game. That's classic.

    Nice work justin.

  17. #17

    Default

    Jeez, took 7 hours + a chemist to figure out the atomic composition of Justin's story was primarily bullshit.

  18. #18

    Default

    This is just the tip of the iceburg. What many of you don't realize, probably half these books offshore are actually run by crime families. It won't surprise me to hear more juicy news of racketering charges in the weeks ahead. Unfortunately forum sites like this are facilitators for many mob run sites. If I ran one of these joints I would be very fearful of entering the United States on an airplane, you never know when your going to get scooped up. Hopefully most forum owners are based overseas and don't have U.S ties which would keep them safe. To say crime families aren't operating out of Costa Rica is like saying birds don't fly.

  19. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DrunkenLullaby View Post
    Jeez, took 7 hours + a chemist to figure out the atomic composition of Justin's story was primarily bullshit.
    I didn't even consider it because it was posted 2 hours before April 1st where I live.

  20. #20

  21. #21

    Default

    Nicely done Justin...one hell of a story.

  22. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Justin7 View Post
    April Fools!
    I really didn't expect you to pull an April fools gag like this Justin, but I must admit. It was pretty damn funny!

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  23. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diogee View Post
    I didn't even consider it because it was posted 2 hours before April 1st where I live.
    April fools was almost over where I live when I saw the story. If I'd thought a bit harder I would have realized yanks were still rubbing the sleep out their eyes and not spolied the fun by calling it so early.

    A pretty fair haul there anyway Justin. Well done!

Top