[mofome]

make it 7 for each. Os are too awful to adjust prices for and the cubs are always going to be over-hyped. those will be the teams to fade.

[20Four7]

I have 4 teams that were worse than the O's last year. The O's were -15 units by my calculations.

Orioles -15.00
Pirates -15.78
Athletics-16.42
Astros -18.56
Giants -21.33

[mofome]

I have 4 teams that were worse than the O's last year. The O's were -15 units by my calculations.

Orioles -15.00
Pirates -15.78
Athletics-16.42
Astros -18.56
Giants -21.33

balt -1896 and down 6 years running according to Michael Murray.

[20Four7]

Losing teams:
D-backs are betting better but I wished I'd faded them for the 2004 season.

2006:
Reds 80-82 -0.01
Yankees 97-65 -2.04
White Sox 90-72 -3.13
Red Sox 86-76 -3.98
Mariners 78-84 -4.14
Diamondbacks 76-86 -4.89
Rockies 76-86 -6.05
Rangers 80-82 -6.25
Phillies 85-77 -6.50
Nationals 71-91 -7.31
Astros 82-80 -12.08
Orioles 70-92 -12.61
Pirates 67-95 -12.82
Giants 76-85 -13.48
Brewers 75-87 -13.61
Indians 78-84 -15.13
Cardinals 84-78 -16.14
Braves 79-83 -16.85
Devil Rays 61-101 -18.72
Cubs 66-96 -24.55

2005
Mets 83-79 -3.85
Reds 73-89 -7.76
Diamondbacks 77-85 -8.40
Giants 75-87 -8.83
Twins 83-79 -9.04
Padres 82-80 -9.15
Rockies 67-95 -12.52
Marlins 83-79 -16.03
Yankees 95-67 -16.24
Cubs 79-83 -16.83
Pirates 67-95 -17.99
Royals 56-106 -19.78
Tigers 71-91 -20.25
Mariners 69-93 -20.34
Orioles 74-88 -20.37
Dodgers 71-91 -25.33


2004
Indians 80-82 -0.40
Nationals 67-95 -1.25
Phillies 86-76 -1.55
Orioles 78-84 -1.70
Devil Rays 70-91 -2.55
White Sox 83-79 -2.80
Red Sox 98-64 -3.80
Athletics 91-71 -5.10
Astros 92-70 -6.40
Rockies 68-94 -7.80
Pirates 72-89 -8.00
Tigers 72-90 -8.35
Mets 71-91 -12.25
Brewers 67-94 -16.20
Marlins 83-79 -17.25
Blue Jays 67-94 -19.10
Cubs 89-73 -19.95
Royals 58-104 -25.70
Mariners 63-99 -28.70
Diamondbacks 51-111 -60.15

[5 star bomb]

Cubs are the best team in the NL Central. Fade with caution

[20Four7]

balt -1896 and down 6 years running according to Michael Murray.

He has them down 1896 units. If so I don't think that's correct, or is it 1896 over 6 years. I'm at work so I don't have a lot of complete data here. I'm not following what the -1896 means.

[mofome]

He has them down 1896 units. If so I don't think that's correct, or is it 1896 over 6 years. I'm at work so I don't have a lot of complete data here. I'm not following what the -1896 means.

18 units

[20Four7]

Ok that is better, I may be slightly incorrect here but at the end of the day being down 15 units or being down 18 is still down.

[mofome]

Ok that is better, I may be slightly incorrect here but at the end of the day being down 15 units or being down 18 is still down.