View New Posts
  1. #1

    Default USC Will Be Dangerous In Tourney

    Watch out

    SBR Founder Join Date: 7/20/2005


  2. #2
    Deuce's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-12-08
    Posts: 22,997
    SBR Points: 110
    Message Me

    Default

    No, you heard that rooster sucker Greg Gumble on CBS just like I did. Mayo is a rooster sucker. They won't do shit. They will get upset by dogs like the rest of the tourney.
    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/17/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/24/2012


  3. #3

    Default

    Coach, sharp tells me Cornell -7 is a strong play. he tells me that they will bury their opp early after the scare last night. i believe him.

  4. #4
    Deuce's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-12-08
    Posts: 22,997
    SBR Points: 110
    Message Me

    Default

    I got MSU going deep. Izzo is Mr. March. I got Louisville, UCLA, MSU, and Kansas in Final Four.
    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/17/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/24/2012


  5. #5

    Default

    hey jj how about a gambling video on betting rivalry games in honor of the Duke/UNC game tonight?

  6. #6

    Default

    USC was one shot away from beating Kansas and Memphis. Team is solid, very talented. If they had just a little more depth they would be nasty..

    SBR Founder Join Date: 11/16/2005


  7. #7

    Default

    Mayo looks like he is getting better and better and starting to dominate , usc also really balanced and play good D

    SBR Founder Join Date: 7/20/2005


  8. #8

    Default

    USC is nasty of defense. Especially in the lane with Taj Gibson.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 11/16/2005


  9. #9

    Default

    They have improved but they are going to get like an 8 or 9 seed and go down to the #1.

  10. #10

    Default

    They beat Texas last season with Young and w/out O.J Mayo which balances out.. If USC gets some good points they should be a decent bet.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 11/16/2005


  11. #11

    Default

    Same as last year...USC was very talented...they could beat many teams on any given day. However, you saw they blow a huge lead against UNC =\

  12. #12

  13. #13

    Default

    usc didn't even get past the first round.
    400pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/15/2012

    175pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY6th Place 5/29/2012

    275pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY3rd Place 5/16/2012

    40pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY16th Place 5/28/2012

    325pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY2nd Place 5/25/2012


  14. #14

    Default

    USC had the worst draw out of every #6 seed. I think the NCAA purposely created this matchup for the ratings. Beasley vs Mayo, or two childhood friends in Walker and Mayo going at it as well. Horrible draw for the Trojans.

  15. #15

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mofome View Post
    pac-10 stinks.
    Yeah, next year we'll try to do better & get 8 or 9 of the Sweet 16 instead of the lousy 3 we have this year. Some day, if we're really lucky we'll be able to compete with the likes of the SEC and their 1.

  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DrunkenLullaby View Post
    Yeah, next year we'll try to do better & get 8 or 9 of the Sweet 16 instead of the lousy 3 we have this year. Some day, if we're really lucky we'll be able to compete with the likes of the SEC and their 1.


    enlightening post. 3 teams in the sweet 16 in 2008?? wow! almost the same as back to back national champions in football and basketball. its kinda the same. hey, you keep living in your world and i'll carry on in reality. k?


  18. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mofome View Post
    hey, you keep living in your world and i'll carry on in reality. k?

    Ah yes, silly me, I thought we were talking about college basketball...and I thought we were talking about this year.

    If we want to set arbitrary timeframes, I could point out that the Pac-10 has won twice as many hoops titles as the SEC since 1964, but of course that's not very relevant...and neither are "The Pride of the NIT"'s Gators' consecutive titles....THIS year.

    Reality is Florida was awesome for 2 years, but SEC hoops sucked THIS year.

  19. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DrunkenLullaby View Post
    Ah yes, silly me, I thought we were talking about college basketball...and I thought we were talking about this year.

    If we want to set arbitrary timeframes, I could point out that the Pac-10 has won twice as many hoops titles as the SEC since 1964, but of course that's not very relevant...and neither are "The Pride of the NIT"'s Gators' consecutive titles....THIS year.

    Reality is Florida was awesome for 2 years, but SEC hoops sucked THIS year.

    oh, well thats neat, but there isn't much 'arbitrary about the most recent national championships won. you can define it as arbitrary because you think that helps your case, but in reality, the last 2 national titles were won by the SEC, it doesn't get any more recent than that.
    as for the pac-10 dominance, i believe they are 4-5 ats in the NCAA, not sure about the NIT.

    Im sure the pac-10 is good at something. Just not sports.


  20. #20

    Default

    who is USC playing this week? USC dangerous in tourney?? Those homos should've been in the NIT

    SBR Founder Join Date: 12/9/2005


  21. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BigDog View Post
    who is USC playing this week? USC dangerous in tourney?? Those homos should've been in the NIT


    This is a well thought out post and i agree.

  22. #22

  23. #23

    Default

    it's too bad Mr. Mario Doblin Sr. wasn't wearing a Trojan on 4/6/68 in stall #4 at woodstock so we wouldn't have to read assinine predictions by webber which are always way off

    SBR Founder Join Date: 10/9/2005


  24. #24

    Default

    in fairness to sc, they did draw the team with the overall best player, in the first round, it was a tough match up for anyone, and what's g'town's excuse for losing to davidson?

  25. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mofome View Post
    oh, well thats neat, but there isn't much 'arbitrary about the most recent national championships won. you can define it as arbitrary because you think that helps your case, but in reality, the last 2 national titles were won by the SEC, it doesn't get any more recent than that.
    as for the pac-10 dominance, i believe they are 4-5 ats in the NCAA, not sure about the NIT.

    Im sure the pac-10 is good at something. Just not sports.

    Wow...quoting ATS numbers in a lame attempt to defend your conference which, while dominant in recent years PAST, sucked ass this year...pretty weak...not unlike the Vols defense & rebounding. Guess I won't be seeing you in San Antonio after all.

    Btw, BESIDES sports, here's something we're not too bad at:

    http://www.insomniacslounge.com/labels/UCLA.html
    Last edited by DrunkenLullaby; 03-28-08 at 01:09 AM.

  26. #26

    Default

    sec sucked this yr, i said it weeks ago after memphis lost to tennessee, lets talk about the conf that i said was the best, the big east

  27. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hoopster42 View Post
    sec sucked this yr, i said it weeks ago after memphis lost to tennessee, lets talk about the conf that i said was the best, the big east
    Certainly tough to argue against Big East now, particularly if Villanova represents tomorrow. I thought Pac 10 was best all year, but must now defer to Big East...unless Stanford bitchslaps Texas tomorrow - unlikely.

Top