so i checked it and calculated it all
| Poster's Sportsbook Poll: 2011View Poll Results | ||
| # 1 5Dimes | 450 total points | 5Dimes Review |
| # 2 Pinnacle | 408 total points | Pinnacle Review |
| # 3 Heritage | 227 total points | Heritage Review |
| # 4 Bookmaker | 138 total points | Bookmaker Review |
| # 5 BetIslands | 129 total points | BetIslands Review |
| SBR Top-Rated SportsbooksRecommended List | ||
| Pinnacle Sports | SBR Rating A+ | Pinnacle Sports Review |
| 5Dimes | SBR Rating A+ | 5Dimes Review |
| BookMaker | SBR Rating A+ | BookMaker Review |
| Legends | SBR Rating A+ | Legends Review |
| Bodog | SBR Rating A | Bodog Review |
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005
i agree stryke should not have published these records. altough they apparently desperately want to prove they are in the right, the way they do this seems unprofessional to me.
that being said, they did publish that e-mail and what appears to be a screenshot of some sort of fraud detection-program, and i don't think it makes you look good,
you don't have to defend your action to me ofcourse, but I'm trying to see who's good and who's bad here and I am curious whether you were really playing poker with "other" users on the same IP, as the program is telling us. if you were, the money was rightly confiscated imo.
also, blackmailing a book into giving you your money with the threat of going to all the forums does not seem very professional to me either (either you go to the forums to warn other users, or you don't go to the forums, using it as leverage in a dispute I think is not very classy behaviour), especially if the accusation of chipdumping is true (and it's difficult to believe stryke, or the poker-provider, would just make up data on same-ip pokerplay).
SBR Founder Join Date: 9/13/2005
Apparently you tried it, since you know all this. Anyway, Ongame said you were chipdumping, you deny it, there's no way to determine who's telling the truth. I don't want to defend Stryyke in any way, but I can somehow imagine if their regular poker provider tells them you cheated, they listen to them and lock your account. I see how Strykke might have incentive to keep your money (altough it's such a small amount, it's hardly the effort), but why would Ongame accuse you of anything without any proof?
Either way, isn't your dispute really with Ongame (I can imagine you want them to prove their case, perhaps the representative from Stryyke can pressure Ongame to release this data?), and not with Strykke? Based on what we know I don't really understand where Stryyke has gone wrong, except believing Ongame's word over your word.
SBR Founder Join Date: 9/13/2005
I thought Mr.Champi already did fill out a complaint form, but I guess not.![]()
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005