[capone]

They are the partypoker sportsbook and I was wondering if anyone had any info on them, like limits, weird policies, etc.
thanks

[NiceMaaan]

I had a buddy who used them, he said they were ok, but he never requested a huge payout so who knows.

[onlooker]

SBR rating = B-

Here is the SBR Review on the main site: PartyBets

Here is a good thread in the Players Talk about them:
http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-ta...ck-wanted.html

[bigboydan]

Partybets are part of the PartyGaming Plc family of books which includes GameBookers. The last time I checked, they only offer USD as account currency which was rather strange considering they don't take U.S. players anymore. The one problem that really sucked is that they will slash your limits to the ground if your found to be an advantaged type player.

My overall assessment of them would be to just pass on this book.

[20Four7]

I play poker on party and sometimes use them. They have slow moving lines but are quick to take a game OTB after someone makes a large bet. I haven't had any real problems with them. Have cashed out several thousand to moneybookers no problem.

[Santo]

They have unfair tennis set betting rules. I believe they declare bets a loser on retirements, which is a push/lose situation.

[Jamie_UK]

Gamebookers skin , they are prone to some fibs when it comes to their bonus terms , especially the last one when they rolled out their new horse racing book. HTVbet is another skin.

[capone]

Thanks for the heads up everyone

[Justin7]

I have a generally negative impression of PartyBets. I had a dispute with them, and they would not disclose any of the dispute details of the dispute in a confiscation complaint. There were enough other problems in the player's version that we were able to determine what happened using "hypotheticals"... But I'd prefer to see a higher level of cooperation when dealing with a balance confiscation.

[bigboydan]

They have unfair tennis set betting rules. I believe they declare bets a loser on retirements, which is a push/lose situation.

That is extremely slighted indeed Santo.