[isetcap]

I want Raiders to be UNBANNED. He is definitely a caustic poster, but his points often contain at least some amount of validity. I have only been here for a few weeks but during that time I have not detected him overly pushing his own agenda outside of SBR. I like the spark he provides and I hope that even people who dislike him will agree with me in that he should be allowed to post.

[quarm_]

good for you - i like him banned :-P
he is someone who always wants to have the last post, an attention whore...who loves to have personal spam and shit "wars" with other posters - why would anyone miss him *lol*

[natrass]

He is funny though quarm ..

To be honest, I doubt hed want to post here again ... would you after being banned?
I wouldnt.

[quarm_]

Im sure he would - that guy doesnt care about his reputation or other people, as soon as theres a gambling forum you can be sure raiders is there.
Funny? maybe im too grown up, or smell too much fresh air, to find him funny :-P

[bigboydan]

quarm, i would have thought you would have missed your feuding partner by now

i personaly find raiders posts to be informative, but he does seem to like to stir the pot at times, but so does everyone else at times.

[quarm_]

i personaly find raiders posts to be informative

Hes a tout, and defends shit books...and if someone like Jay refuses to pay him for promoting BoS, he takes it personal and the shit starts...whats so informative about that?
I think there are enough good posters here, without raiders issues, that can give you the information you might need...

[Mudcat]

He is funny though quarm ..

That's odd. I think my description would be more like:

one of the most tragically humorless posting forum nerds I have ever seen.

[clonecat]

Raiders was extremely entertaining, did have some good points, but if someone did not know Raiders and was new to the forum, they could be misled with some of the books he promoted. Not my call. The Rich Coast drama was probably enough for SBR to ban about every poster.

[natrass]

I think slacker said it best about darwinism. Anyone who goes onto a forum and just takes as gospel what one guy is saying is simply going to get ****ed one day or another.

Anyone who is gambling should be over 18, like an adult. You'd think raiders was some kind of David Koresh (the waco bloke)

You cant cross a road for seven miles either way outside a school because of the road safety railings ... or take lighters on aeroplanes ... people can go too far under the guise of "security".

Again to echo slacker, FREE THE RCS FIVE!!!

[SBR_John]

He is welcome back. When and if he is ready to admit what everyone with an IQ over 62 already knows, he is welcome back. Otherwise, I thank him and wish him and his esteemed colleagues well.

But this forum will not be used as a tool of manipulation. We have, at any one time, over 100 new visitors reading and learning here. It's too dangerous to them and unfair to them to subject them to a 3 card Monty.

I want those new to the forum and sports gambling to know that at SBR: Devious manipulators will be banned.

[BuddyBear]

what did he do to get banned?

[tacomax]

He was involved in RCS-gate.

AK admitted he was shilling for his personal gain during the RCS mess and was re-admitted to the forum. When raiders does the same then no doubt he'll be allowed bask as well.