SBR Forum - Free Picks & Sports Handicapping Legendz The PIG WSEX
BetJamaica Matchbook BetOnline
SBR - SportsBookReview.com 5Dimes The Greek Intertops
SBR Recommended Sportsbooks
1. Pinnacle Sports ... SBR Rating A+ ... Pinnacle Sports Review
2. The Greek Sports Book ... SBR Rating A+ ... The Greek Review
3. BookMaker ... SBR Rating A+ ... BookMaker Review
4. BetJamaica ... SBR Rating A+ ... BetJamaica Review
5. Legendz Sports ... SBR Rating A+ ... Legendz Review
Posters' Top Rated Sportsbooks
1. Pinnacle Sports ... 150 total points ... Pinnacle Sports Review
2. Matchbook ... 144 total points ... Matchbook Review
3. BetJamaica ... 115 total points ... BetJamaica Review
4. BookMaker / CRIS ... 109 total points ... BookMaker Review
5. The Greek Sports Book ... 91 total points ... The Greek Review
Go Back   Sports Handicapping - Sports Betting - Sports Picks - SBR Forum > Sports Betting, Sportsbooks & General Discussion > Players Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-09-2007, 09:27 AM   #1 (permalink)
Bill Dozer
Administrator
 
Bill Dozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-12-05
Posts: 5,415
Bill Dozer is online now
Default SBR Posters Top Sportsbooks: Final Results for October 2007

Sportsbook Name 1st Place2nd Place3rd PlaceTotal Points
Pinnacle2086150
Matchbook16712144
Bet Jamaica10117115
Bookmaker / BetCris8911109
The Greek411991
WSEX59576
5Dimes53655
Bodog34340
BetFair34134
Carib5128
CanBet13120
Legendz21220
Bet36512219
Heritage12116
BetOnline3115
Sportsbook.com2113
The Pig312
SportsInteraction (SIA)1210
Ladbrokes118
Diamond Sportsbook (DSI)117
VIP117
BetDon15
BetSOS15
BetGameday15
Wager715
WagerWeb15
BetPop14
Skybook14
BetBTW14
Mansion14
Jazz14
Bowmans14
BetEd13
HansaBet13
ABC13
PartyBets13
Will Hill13

See How Posters Voted
Scoring: 1st place votes = 5 pts. / 2nd place votes = 4 pts. / 3rd place votes = 3 pts.


SBR Posters Poll I: May 2007 Results

Last edited by Bill Dozer : 11-09-2007 at 10:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 11:37 AM   #2 (permalink)
bigboydan
Moderator
 
bigboydan's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-10-05
Posts: 40,373
bigboydan is offline
Default

Which one of you guys voted for BetBTW in regards to ranking them #2 on your poll, and why?
Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 11:51 AM   #3 (permalink)
Art Vandeleigh
SBR Sharp
 
Art Vandeleigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-31-06
Posts: 392
Art Vandeleigh is online now
Default

I think Tradesports gets a bad rap around here.

Betfair takes 5% off winning bets.

I am not affiliated with Tradesports in anyway shape or form, and am not an investor or whatever. Just a player.

I'd just like to see exchanges that are open to US players be stronger and supported by more players.

I think it can be used well with Matchbook (funds can easily and quickly be transferred back and forth with no commission), especially by those players for who it takes some time to wager $10,000. A lot more excellent wagering opportunities at Tradesports, IMO.
Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 04:53 PM   #4 (permalink)
bigboydan
Moderator
 
bigboydan's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-10-05
Posts: 40,373
bigboydan is offline
Default

Hows Tradesports volume in comparison to Matchbook in your opinion Art?
Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 06:24 PM   #5 (permalink)
Art Vandeleigh
SBR Sharp
 
Art Vandeleigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-31-06
Posts: 392
Art Vandeleigh is online now
Default

Not familiar with those numbers Dan.

If you go to their site, one of their main market makers, someone who goes by the username Fair Value, he's often times around their trading pit chat site. You can have a chat with hime there, I'm sure he can give you more details than I. But just at random I see at the moment NCAAF Indiana (-2, Matchbook, -1.5 Tradesports) vs Northwestern, availability at Matchbook is $1,134 at -108, at Tradesports $500 at -117 and $3000 at -122, of course you can offer your own price their as well.

There are some things Tradesports offers Matchbook doesn't such as

- 1 1/2 puck lines in hockey
- several more alternate lines on all NFL games
- market makers for golf tournys, especially the ones Tiger plays in
- at the moment I still don't see over/under for NCAA hoops at Matchbook
- Over/unders for soccer matches (if anyone cares)
- and of course, every event at Tradesports is open for trading until the bitter end.


Not trying to bad mouth Matchbook, I think it's in US players interest if they both prosper.

It's just hard for me to imagine that anyone who likes Matchbook, and according to the survey it's number one for U.S. players, that there isn't a place in a players portfolio for some funds and some usefulness at Tradesports, even with the higher take out.
Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 06:39 PM   #6 (permalink)
betplom
SBR MVP
 
betplom's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-20-06
Location: YYZ
Posts: 2,639
betplom is online now
Default

I like Tradesports in general.

I stopped playing there after Neteller was no longer available,payout options are limited for North American players, no Instadebit, Moneybookers, or Fedex cheque only regular mail cheque.

If they offered Instadebit OR Moneybookers I'd start playing with them again.
Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2007, 12:22 AM   #7 (permalink)
Dark Horse
SBR Hall of Famer
 
Dark Horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-14-05
Posts: 6,754
Dark Horse is online now
Default

I used to have five figures in Tradesports. That became useless after liquidity went way south. TS isn't even a blimp on the radar now.

As to the voting result. The only book that got a distribution that looks off is Carib. A post count of 25 isn't that hard to run up, if books take this as serious free advertising.
Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2007, 03:06 AM   #8 (permalink)
Art Vandeleigh
SBR Sharp
 
Art Vandeleigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-31-06
Posts: 392
Art Vandeleigh is online now
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Horse View Post
Cashed out at Tradesports after they were downgraded here first to B- and then C+. But I'm taking another look at them. In the new climate financial security is the number one priority. And as far as I know Tradesports is very reliable when it comes to paying.

Matchbook is probably the better exchange, but Tradesports is right up there for featured games (nationally televised). I would rate Matchbook A and Tradesports B+ to A-, which is much higher than the official ratings here. So my question is: does SBR hold exchanges to higher standards? If so, why? It is much easier to make a profit when playing directly against other gamblers than against the house. Not only is the vig lower, but, just as importantly, the player -not the house- benefits from square action!

When I look at my records over the years my profit margin at exchanges definitely exceeds that at regular books. Not even close. I'm sure many others have a similar experience. So, if we all have the best interest of gamblers in mind, why do exchanges such as Matchbook and Tradesports not get two major thumbs up?!

The only problem I have with exchanges is the lack of action. This can be solved through better feedback. The more people play at exchanges, the more action. In the long run greater popularity of exchanges could force books to lower their juice. So unless we all love to play at full juice against some very sharp linesmakers, let's start giving these places their due. Instead of holding them back with overly critical ratings.

Dark Horse, here is something you wrote earlier this year regarding exchanges. I don't understand why you won't support an exchange like Tradesports with some action, especially after the passionate case you made for exchanges, unless you had a problem with someone there. Liquidity has increased since they made their agreements with Pinnacle/Matchbook.

Just what is your version of liquidity anyway? Are you looking to trade every game on the board every night?

Last edited by Art Vandeleigh : 11-10-2007 at 03:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2007, 04:06 AM   #9 (permalink)
Santo
SBR MVP
 
Santo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-08-05
Location: England
Posts: 1,351
Santo is online now
Default

Main reason I don't use them is simply that TradeBetX doesn't work with Firefox, and I have no intention to learn the contracts interface.
Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2007, 04:09 AM   #10 (permalink)
vanman
SBR Wise Guy
 
vanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-08-07
Location: England
Posts: 960
vanman is online now
Default

Glad to see pinny is still number 1 even though US players can`t play there.
Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2007, 04:16 AM   #11 (permalink)
Art Vandeleigh
SBR Sharp
 
Art Vandeleigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-31-06
Posts: 392
Art Vandeleigh is online now
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Santo View Post
Main reason I don't use them is simply that TradeBetX doesn't work with Firefox, and I have no intention to learn the contracts interface.

As a European player you have several other exchange options.
Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2007, 04:39 AM   #12 (permalink)
Dark Horse
SBR Hall of Famer
 
Dark Horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-14-05
Posts: 6,754
Dark Horse is online now
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Vandeleigh View Post
Dark Horse, here is something you wrote earlier this year regarding exchanges. I don't understand why you won't support an exchange like Tradesports with some action, especially after the passionate case you made for exchanges, unless you had a problem with someone there. Liquidity has increased since they made their agreements with Pinnacle/Matchbook.

Just what is your version of liquidity anyway? Are you looking to trade every game on the board every night?
They're in my books-on-backburner file. There's really not much there that Matchbook doesn't offer. Tradesports is probably best for balances around 2500. A balance of anything more than four figures is basically just sitting there. In other words, it is much easier to double 2500 than 10K.

TS seems a victim of micromanagement. I don't know what the background of those folks is, but it isn't sports betting. They rarely listen to a word of the many good suggestions thrown out by members. You can only run into a wall so many times. And that split between TS and Intrade was an absolute fiasco in terms of liquidity. (not to mention that they didn't tell anybody at the time that transferring funds to Intrade was fine, but the funds couldn't be transferred back. That was the final drop for me).

Last edited by Dark Horse : 11-10-2007 at 04:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2007, 07:58 AM   #13 (permalink)
LGBoots
SBR Wise Guy
 
LGBoots's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-10-05
Location: UK
Posts: 517
LGBoots is offline
Default

I wish Matchbook would offer a £ Account option. Like many here I have been burned by the $ lately
Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2007, 08:35 AM   #14 (permalink)
SPECULATOR 13
SBR Wise Guy
 
SPECULATOR 13's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-12-07
Location: Toronto,Canada
Posts: 586
SPECULATOR 13 is offline
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Vandeleigh View Post
I think Tradesports gets a bad rap around here.
I'd just like to see exchanges that are open to US players be stronger and supported by more players.
I think it can be used well with Matchbook (funds can easily and quickly be transferred back and forth with no commission), especially by those players for who it takes some time to wager $10,000. A lot more excellent wagering opportunities at Tradesports, IMO.
ART I'm with you i don't get it?I have been using both MB & TS,the only thing is that TS as a hard time matching the liquidity of MB.It is to bad that it is those f*ck-ups at BETFAIR (whom won't even post U.S. odds)that seem to carry all the money.Dark House is right about TS's attitude they won't do anything to attract the attention of the American market,they seem to be contented to just lick their crotches