[Senator7]

Does anybody have a sportsbook that they love that SBR has rated a D+ or lower? If so, which ones? Just curious!

Senator 7

[Illusion]

No I don't, but its a good question.

[SBR_John]

BetMill is a decent book at D+ maybe SIA if you are into the torture thing.

[BuddyBear]

SIA....not sure why it is rated a D+ but I find it to be a pretty solid book for my style of play.

[jjgold]

No.SBR ratings are very very accurate

[Mudcat]

Does anybody have a sportsbook that they love that SBR has rated a D+ or lower? If so, which ones? Just curious!

Let me make sure I word this properly.

Though I don't have money there right now, and I would never say I actually loved them - nor would I ever recommend them to anyone else - I have made a LOT of money this year with virtually no problems at Royal (rated D).

[Senator7]

BTW, this thread is in no way meant to create discussion about a poor rating that SBR might have given. I simply am curious as to how many people play at low rated books and what low rated books those are.

Senator 7

[jjgold]

Senator I would have to see lots of D books and see if there was a rating I did not agree with

[tacomax]

This is a nasty thread - like you're admitting to your vices in public.

"I'm tacomax and I visit skanky hookers 3 times a week"

Seriously, I like Linesmaker - nice site, nice bonuses, rebate on losses, good payer and a D+ rating.

[Senator7]

This is a nasty thread - like you're admitting to your vices in public.

"I'm tacomax and I visit skanky hookers 3 times a week"

Seriously, I like Linesmaker - nice site, nice bonuses, rebate on losses, good payer and a D+ rating.

That's why I thought this would be an interesting thread and I'm surprised more people haven't posted.

Senator 7

[SBR_John]

Its a good thread and there are a few books that are playable at D+ but only a few. At C+ there are maybe 10-15 so big difference between a D+ and a C+. Be careful with the D's...they are rated that because of player complaints.