[fearless]

It's the easiest deposit method if you know someone who has an account at a particular book. I'll give you $500 cash if you transfer $500 to my account...

It's an easy withdrawal method if you know someone who has an account at a particular book. (Using the same method as above.)

Universal account to account transfers would also make book to book transfers easier for players and LESS PAINFUL for books. I'll give you $500 at Pinnacle for $500 at Legendz, the players are happy and the books lose nothing.

[Santo]

It's also a books biggest vulnerability in terms of account access, scammers etc.

[fearless]

Originally Posted by Santo

It's also a books biggest vulnerability in terms of account access, scammers etc.

I don't understand that. Will you give us more info on that?

[Santo]

A lot of past disputes have involved somebody getting access to your account by buying a database etc, then doing account to account transfers to their account.

I think Youwager had a few like this, and there have been others sporadically.

[CrazyL]

Santo brings up a good point, this would potentially open the door for more problems. This happens on poker sites and a lot of times unless the sites catch them in the act, you're shit out of luck..

[SBR_John]

Think about it. If you had a business would you want your customers easily moving money to one of your competitors?

And in this crazy industry when a book finds a cherry processor they dont want a buch of transfers in just to max out their cherry processor.

Great idea but will never happen. The best thing a player can do is play with a couple of A+ books for a long time. They will let you do transfers even if its not in their policy.

[Santo]

SBRJ: I think the poster was referring to accounts within the same book.