[remmy358]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070901/...han_koreans_dc

of course south korea denies it, but here's what was said:

"A Taliban commander, speaking to Reuters on condition of anonymity, said on Saturday: "We got more than $20 million dollars from them (the Seoul government). With it we will purchase arms, get our communication network renewed and buy vehicles for carrying out more suicide attacks.""

we are saving those SOB's from N Korea, and this is how they repay us and the rest of the world?

of course they paid them off, they wouldn't let us get involved in the talks, and it took weeks.

sons of bitches.

[remmy358]

Ive been stationed on the DMZ in Korea (1979/80), and there aint no active duty assignment worldwide that is as hated as being stationed there.Those bastards on the North would always be popping off rounds at us, although way to far to actually hit anything with small arms fire, it was a regular occurance getting shot at there.

Im not so sure about saving s korea from the north, when I was there the s korean troops were some bad as$ mfers. At least the ones I was around,they could hold their own against anyone. I really would like to believe that its not true about the south paying off the Taliban.

later

not trying to start a political debate but n. korea was building a program and threatening s. korea. s. korea ran to the USA and asked for help. president bush has been the one actively involved and leading the negotitations to shut down the reactors...

[JBC77]

Why would you pay for hostages? Doesn't that open your country up to more extortion? The tali-bums are probably looking to capture some more Koreans as we speak. F!@#$ muslims.

[Helmut]

At least South Korea did something proactive to quickly get their guys back. If you were there instead of the Koreans, they mide as well lop your head of on day one because this sad country won't do jack shit to get you released.

[JBC77]

At least South Korea did something proactive to quickly get their guys back. If you were there instead of the Koreans, they mide as well lop your head of on day one because this sad country won't do jack shit to get you released.

I understand what your saying.

But if your in the practice of kidnapping for extortion and you have countries x, y and z. You know country Z pays well to get hostages back and countries x and y don't pay at all. Who are you going to try to kidnap next?

[btwizzy]

That is a sick notion, but I bet kidnappers take that into account. It is all a sick game just to get some money.

[JC]

Didn't the US trade arms for hostages back in the 80's?

More recently, Libya was paid quite a pretty penny to release the Bulgarians, around $400 million.

I don't think the South Koreans are too worried about it since they will be getting out of where they have no business being in the first place.

[remmy358]

Didn't the US trade arms for hostages back in the 80's?

More recently, Libya was paid quite a pretty penny to release the Bulgarians, around $400 million.

I don't think the South Koreans are too worried about it since they will be getting out of where they have no business being in the first place.

i think it's funny how right when n. korea agrees to shut down the reactors (thanks to great negotiating by president bush, although no one will give him props for anything GOOD he does), they pull this crap...when you pay for hostages or make other negotiations, it just leads to more kidnappings...it's a horrible thing.

we should have let north korea blow them to pieces, those cocksuckers.