[remmy358]

Ganch,

since you seem to be all over this type of stuff, i was wondering if you had any stats on NCAAF home dogs on the ML. what would the profit/loss % be if you played the ML on every NCAAF home dog (this may vary because various sites offer various lines for ML..etc)...but would you know of a way to get an estimated W/L figure? i think home dogs on the ML are a great way to make $, and i play them often.

thanks.

[Ganchrow]

since you seem to be all over this type of stuff, i was wondering if you had any stats on NCAAF home dogs on the ML. what would the profit/loss % be if you played the ML on every NCAAF home dog (this may vary because various sites offer various lines for ML..etc)...but would you know of a way to get an estimated W/L figure? i think home dogs on the ML are a great way to make $, and i play them often.

Unfortunately, I don't currently have access to reliable NCAAF money line data.

[pokernut9999]

So far this year you would be 1-12

[BuddyBear]

Ganch,

since you seem to be all over this type of stuff, i was wondering if you had any stats on NCAAF home dogs on the ML. what would the profit/loss % be if you played the ML on every NCAAF home dog (this may vary because various sites offer various lines for ML..etc)...but would you know of a way to get an estimated W/L figure? i think home dogs on the ML are a great way to make $, and i play them often.

thanks.

It's about 50%.......

[BuddyBear]

So far this year you would be 1-12

I don't think home dogs fared real well the first week but I know for certain at least Temple and Wyoming covered so that should be 2 wins.

[pokernut9999]

Correction Home dogs were 4-9 vs spread. Wyoming and Utep only straight up winners.

[remmy358]

Unfortunately, I don't currently have access to reliable NCAAF money line data.

oh ok. thanks anyways. i obviousuly know that total W/L % would be under 500, but i think that it may turn a profit