| Poster's Sportsbook Poll: 2011View Poll Results | ||
| # 1 5Dimes | 450 total points | 5Dimes Review |
| # 2 Pinnacle | 408 total points | Pinnacle Review |
| # 3 Heritage | 227 total points | Heritage Review |
| # 4 Bookmaker | 138 total points | Bookmaker Review |
| # 5 BetIslands | 129 total points | BetIslands Review |
| SBR Top-Rated SportsbooksRecommended List | ||
| Pinnacle Sports | SBR Rating A+ | Pinnacle Sports Review |
| 5Dimes | SBR Rating A+ | 5Dimes Review |
| BookMaker | SBR Rating A+ | BookMaker Review |
| Legends | SBR Rating A+ | Legends Review |
| Bodog | SBR Rating A | Bodog Review |
Just talked to CS at betjam regarding rollover, but wanted further clarification...
has been since last basketball season that I played with these guys...I was told that the risk ammount counts towards the rollover, so long as it's not a money line of -200 or more...
so $110/ $100, $110 would count towards the rollover...can anyone else confirm this for me?...
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/18/2005
That's correct. Some books will take the lower amount between risk and win.
You're a professional, right?
1) Is the line you are betting on any + price or a - price between -101 and -199? If yes then goto 2. If not then it doesn't count towards the rollover.Originally Posted by pags11
2) The amount you are risking counts towards the rollover.
It took me a while to understand this difficult conundrum but I think I've done a Ganchrow-esque job here. If you're having trouble counting past 10 without using your fingers, give me a shout.
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005
no tacomax, never have once claimed to be a pro gambler...
and reason I asked is so man books have gone to the smaller ammount over the past 6 months, and I don't always get 100% correct answers out of the CS departments...thanks raiders...
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/18/2005
I'm surprised BetJam uses the risk amount, I thought most books used the lesser number no matter what.
Another reason to play there.
exactly spliff, which is why I was just double checking...good policy from a good book...
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/18/2005
most books use the lower of risk and win
SBR Founder Join Date: 9/22/2005
correct steelerfan, and many of them have gone to that in the past year or so (whereas they used the current betjam policy previously)...
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/18/2005
I wouldn't agree with that statement.
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/14/2005
A year ago you were certain that it's otherwise. As always, you did not learn your lesson.
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/14/2005
magnavox,
thanks so much for your once a month piece of shit post!...you must not have much of a life that you have to dig up my old posts like this?...should I let the authorities know that I have a stalker?...
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/18/2005
Nothing pags hates more than being held accountable for his own words. Funny link there magnavox.
Well hopefully pags, the authorities can help you with this stalker who shows up, as you say, once a month. Nothing worse than guys who show up once a month to raise awareness of quality issues.
Those once-a-month stalkers are eating our society alive.
(Seriously though, pags didn't just say someone posts once a month then in the very same sentence, imply it is stalking, did he?
SBR Founder Join Date: 7/21/2005
That's what you call a "spot stalker"
Thanks for the link mags.
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/25/2005
nothing more than Mudcat hates than him having $10,000.00 on one side of a game and $9,999.99 on the other and then bragging to everyone that he has 20 dimes riding on the game like he's a big shot!...hahahahahaha...you are a joke!...
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/18/2005
owned,
did you have to copy the same icon as mudcat 'cause you aren't smart enough to choose your own?...maybe you could come up with some original plays too?...
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/18/2005
What a crock of shit most books use the risk amount
Reply With Quote