View New Posts
  1. #1

    Question Federer and Wimbledon

    Would it have been better to take Federer to win outright pre tournament or bet him in each match?

  2. #2

    Default

    probably to have taken him pre tournament. I don't know what he was against Gasquet but I know most of his matches have been between -3000 and -10000. I also don't know what he was pretournament but it was probably no worse than -300.

  3. #3

    Default

    Much better odds pre tournament even including the Nadal odds.

  4. #4

    Default

    Remember Fed played one less match than everyone else also

    SBR Founder Join Date: 9/8/2005


  5. #5

    Default

    I'm reliably informed that a parlay on Fed each round at Betfair prices would have paid 1.44 minus a touch for comission (-227). Fed started at 1.49 (-204) and came in to 1.47 (-213) pre tournament.

    So as it turned out it was better to bet before the start, had Haas not given Fed a bye in one round, the parlayed odds would have been better.

    Thanks to AP for the numbers.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 9/8/2005


  6. #6

    Default

    Nadal now sitting at +560 at pinnacle, about a buck worse than what I'm being offered

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/25/2005


  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OWNED View Post
    Nadal now sitting at +560 at pinnacle, about a buck worse than what I'm being offered
    Doesn't matter anyway he won't win.

Top