| SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks Recommended Books | ||
| 1. Pinnacle Sports | SBR Rating A+ | Pinnacle Sports Review |
| 2. The Greek Sports Book | SBR Rating A+ | The Greek Review |
| 3. BookMaker | SBR Rating A+ | BookMaker Review |
| 4. BetJamaica | SBR Rating A+ | BetJamaica Review |
| 5. LegendZ Sports | SBR Rating A+ | LegendZ Review |
| SBR Posters' Poll - March 2009 View Complete Results | ||
| 1. BetJamaica | 251 total points | BetJamaica Review |
| 2. The Greek Sports Book | 217 total points | The Greek Review |
| 3. 5Dimes | 181 total points | 5Dimes Review |
| 4. Matchbook | 159 total points | Matchbook Review |
| 5. Pinnacle Sports | 148 total points | Pinnacle Sports Review |
![]() |
View New Posts |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | ||||
|
I loved napster back in the day.
I tried emusic.com and cancelled. No Rush, no Neil Young, no Grateful Dead....place sux if you ask me. |
||||
|
|
#2 | ||||
|
shareaza, free and no spyware, been using for 3 years with no problems
|
||||
|
|
#3 | ||||
|
Limewire.
|
||||
|
|
#4 | ||||
|
Pyrrhic Victor
|
I use soulseek or bit torrents.
|
||||
|
|
#5 | ||||
|
play with my dick
|
I use bearshare
|
||||
|
|
#6 | ||||
|
SBR Problem Poster 2007-08
|
You can't beat the torrents - no more downloading shit and poor quality music from Limewire et al.
|
||||
|
|
#7 | ||||
|
Limewire is great! uh, so far. That's what I was looking for... thanks Taco
|
||||
|
|
#8 | ||||
|
It was owned that said Limewire John. Ya, those two mofos are using the same avitar, and it confuses me sometimes too.
|
||||
|
|
#9 | ||||
|
Depends if you want to pay or not. Free methods are worse and worse because there are legal download methods now available and they are learning, albeit slowly, what customers want so users are jumping ship to pay services even though free is still alive and well. The big names are all decent but it really depends on your taste and needs. Some are monthly fee based, some per selection(s), others obviously are free.
Problem with free such as old napster/shareaza/limeware is quality, availability and control. Since they are community based it is up to the users to have it in the network and the selection and quality wanes and surges. Search today and come back 6 months later and music you once found is gone plus fakes are abundant. It is however useful for popular and obscure but not a predictable selection method like it once seemed. I have some really rare downloads via Shareaza (which I prefer since it handles multiple networks including EDonkey2000, Gnutella, BitTorrent and Shareaza's native network, Gnutella2) that have taken months to download because the users with the files are so few depending on my desires, such as an old live Rush concert that is now 95% finished at 2 months! Problem with pay sites is they vary by selection, ownership rights, format and more. Best thing I would suggest is to Google the words “music download service review” and see what features are important to you and try the service (free trial), several list their artists. Then use the service that most appeals and has the selection you like. Most of my friends use several pay sites plus free and Napster is still alive but a pay service. Review them like a sportsbook and know too that there are some scam services out there so stay with the majors if you buy or at least Google their name to get other’s experience! http://music.yahoo.com/jukebox/ http://www.apple.com/itunes/ http://www.rhapsody.com/ http://www.zune.net/ http://www.urge.com/ http://www.fye.com/ http://www.napster.com/ Above are a handful of top 10 leaders, the others I would have to research because several have switched hands. Smaller unknowns unusually don’t have the stuff you want due to rights because they have to pay to sell and most of the big studios really work to protect who distributes what. I would think Sony, BMG and several other companies have sites too. ![]() |
||||
|
|
#10 | ||||
|
|
||||
|
|
#11 | ||||
|
escarbajo negro
|
Oink
|
||||
|
|
#12 | ||||
|
I usually just use the torrents.
|
||||
|
|
#13 | ||||
|
I personally use Limewire.
Torrent is also nice, but can be a little tough on some that have older systems. ![]() |
||||
|
|
#14 | ||||
|
SF -270
|
Limewire
|
||||
|
|
#15 | ||||
|
Cavs +220 title future
|
Do any of those share "lossless" files like AAC or FLAC?
|
||||
|
|
#16 | ||||
|
escarbajo negro
|
|
||||
|
|
#17 | ||||
|
SBR Problem Poster 2007-08
|
I think that Apple Lossless has a AAC extension, although it is not really an AAC format - it's more in line with FLAC.
|
||||
|
|
#18 | ||||
|
Cavs +220 title future
|
You are right. I am thinking of Apple lossless ALAC(?). I think any lossless would work eventually being converted to FLAC.
|
||||
|
|
#19 | ||||
|
escarbajo negro
|
Ah, never heard of it before. Haven't used any of apple's formats since my ipod broke a couple of years ago.
|
||||
|
|
#20 | ||||
|
Cavs +220 title future
|
|
||||
|
|
#21 | ||||
|
Cavs +220 title future
|
|
||||
|
|
#22 | ||||
|
I'm a big fan of Rhapsody. Been using it for years. iTunes Music Store is good as well.
|
||||
|
|
#23 | |||||
|
escarbajo negro
|
Quote:
Next time they give me some invites, I'll hook you guys up. |
|||||
|
|
#24 | ||||
|
|
||||
|
|
#25 | ||||
|
|
||||
|
|
#26 | ||||
|
In college I downloaded mainly rap music. There were a ton of files that I don't believe were regular tracks released on LPs. I think a lot of it was done by internet DJs who mixed rap music they liked. There's one mix I'm interested in particular which was my favorite one. I know it featured "turn it out" by jermaine dupri. If I'm looking for this kinda obscure stuff, what's my best option?
|
||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|