[onthewhat]

I am posting up at RebateWager tomorrow

You will last a day before they tell you to leave

Also your max bet will be like $500. Is it worth it?

[durito]

You will last a day before they tell you to leave

Also your max bet will be like $500. Is it worth it?

I think their max is less. But, I bet I can figure out how to get something out of it.

[onthewhat]

I'd say they'd also kick you out if they figured out you were trying to lose there to get a rebate and win at other books...

[1st and Ten]

I think their max is less. But, I bet I can figure out how to get something out of it.

Do it for shits and giggles and report back.

[pats3peat]

I'll do the challenge for $300, i think most bettors hit around 50% and im an average bettor. I dont think rebatewager is right about the estimate. what do you say RW?

[Chi_archie]

this should be a good challenge. go get em monkey

[MilfDriller]

When will the fun start? Can't wait to watch this.

[MonkeyF0cker]

I'll start making picks tomorrow.

[MilfDriller]

Excellent. Good luck. Whenever the first pick gets time-stamped, the 60-day clock will be set.

I'm glad somebody is finally stepping up to the plate.

[CarpeDime]

unfukinreal

monkeyfocker said "don't play at rebatewager" and they responded by throwing free money at him??

this fukin reminds me of chicks, how the way to get them to throw themselves at you is to just go up to them and dis them hard to there face

NICKAY!! COME CURSE THE HELL OUT OF THIS NI**A RIGHT HERE! THIS IS YOURE BIG CHANCE! TO FUKIN LAY THE NICKY CURSE ON ONE OF YOURE NEMISSISSES!!

[LLXC]

MoneyF0cker should get the free $1000

JJ doesnt know it yet but he is funding this challenge

Remind me to talk more shit about books with reps on here.

[1st and Ten]

This will be a true test of Nickay's Powers

[MilfDriller]

Carpe, are you the amenable bartender we used to know? Good chap he was.

Anyways, one must simply accept women as they are. It's just nature and they have their programming. It cannot be changed. Your logical mind wants to understand and reason w/ something that is not logical in nature. One must simply accept them for the way they are... or one will get pissed into a mysogenistic fit like Schopenhauer.

[Lost Angel]

Carpe, are you the amenable bartender we used to know? Good chap he was.

Anyways, one must simply accept women as they are. It's just nature and they have their programming. It cannot be changed. Your logical mind wants to understand and reason w/ something that is not logical in nature. One must simply accept them for the way they are... or one will get pissed into a mysogenistic fit like Schopenhauer.

Who the frick is Schopenhauer?!!?

j/k

"His analysis of will led him to the conclusion that emotional, physical, and sexual desires can never be fulfilled. Consequently, he favored a lifestyle of negating human desires, similar to the teachings of Buddhism and Vedanta."


I'd tend to agree.

Making it be? Easier said then done.

[MilfDriller]

I enjoy this part:

The fundamental defect of the female character is a lack of a sense of justice. This originates first and foremost in their want of rationality and capacity for reflexion but it is strengthened by the fact that, as the weaker sex, they are driven to rely not on force but on cunning: hence their instinctive subtlety and their ineradicable tendency to tell lies: for, as nature has equipped the lion with claws and teeth, the elephant with tusks, the wild boar with fangs, the bull with horns and the cuttlefish with ink, so it has equipped woman with the power of dissimulation as her means of attack and defence, and has transformed into this gift all the strength it has bestowed on man in the form of physical strength and the power of reasoning. Dissimulation is thus inborn in her and consequently to be found in the stupid woman almost as often as in the clever one. To make use of it at every opportunity is as natural to her as it is for an animal to employ its means of defence whenever it is attacked, and when she does so she feels that to some extent she is only exercising her rights. A completely truthful woman who does not practice dissimulation is perhaps an impossibility, which is why women see through the dissimulation of others so easily it is inadvisable to attempt it with them. – But this fundamental defect which I have said they possess, together with all that is associated with it, gives rise to falsity, unfaithfulness, treachery, ingratitude, etc. Women are guilty of perjury far more often than men. It is questionable whether they ought to be allowed to take an oath at all.

[20Four7]

GL Monkey, I'm wishing I had talked shit about them. Mind you averaging 3.3 picks a day on average is a lot of picks. Hit them hard during bowl season.

[durito]

GL Monkey, I'm wishing I had talked shit about them. Mind you averaging 3.3 picks a day on average is a lot of picks. Hit them hard during bowl season.

Have they defined what major US sports includes? If it includes NCAAB, then that's not a lot at all.

[jjgold]

I am rooting for rebatewager here, I say Monkey does not do it.

Nice gesture by them

Well anyway like I said nothing wrong with having 3-4-5 solid books

Have options and take advantage of what a book has to offer

[20Four7]

Have they defined what major US sports includes? If it includes NCAAB, then that's not a lot at all.

that is true, however I rarely play NCAAB and if I do it's usually a Brandon Lang fade as he's horrible in that sport.

I would think it would include NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB (if it were playing) plus NCAA football and baskets (men). But that's just what I think.

[MonkeyF0cker]

I would assume NCAAB is included. What about NHL puck lines?

[onthewhat]

I'd say puck lines are included. Monkey, start a new thread with your picks.

[MonkeyF0cker]

I'll make the picks in this thread as we agreed unless Rebatewager would prefer otherwise.

[onthewhat]

Actually, on 2nd thought, pucklines probably not allowed since he said 50%, and not up units...

By 50% he meant 50% on -110 sides, not -260 pucklines...

Sides and totals only I think that are -110

[MrMonkey]

if pucklines are included, this guys will hit 65% in his sleep.

if rebate wager wants a chance, I suggest you go by units up or down, or be prepared for him to hit 60%+..

this will be the easiest 1k anyone in the history will ever make.. i bet he can put in all his bets in under 2 weeks and still hit 64%..

units + or - is your only hope, or you will be down 1k in a few weeks, 10000000%..

Please Nicky stop! Wipe your ass sitting or standing and go about your business! Nickaaay!!!!

[MonkeyF0cker]

I won't use pucklines and I'll use strictly Rebatewager lines as a courtesy for this generous challenge.

[MrMonkey]

Good luck fellow primate! See Nicky, this is how you help a fellow poster by giving out some picks! I know, you don't pick spreads, but then you just said you could hit 64% in 2 weeks! Contradictions apply here? Nickaaay!!!!

[MonkeyF0cker]

Dec 28 7 MON CANADIENS
7:35PM 8 OTT SENATORS u5½

Dec 28 13 MIN WILD
10:35PM 14 LA KINGS u5½

Dec 28 15 PHO COYOTES
10:35PM 16 SJO SHARKS u5½

[MonkeyF0cker]

Who wants to grade this challenge? JJ?

[Bread]

And it begins....

[jjgold]

No not me

Too busy..maybe Nicky?? He always adds the commentary also with stats, etc

[onthewhat]

Monkey, I'm pretty sure it has to be -110 sides and totals. You are playing a -130, -135, and -141 total. Of course you'll hit over 50%.

[flyingillini]

Monkey, this is the easiest dime you will make.

[RebateWager]

Who wants to grade this challenge? JJ?

We will or can throw in 200 bucks for anyone that wants to do it.