View New Posts
  1. #1

    Default A books with biggest drops - were there any signs?

    Two years ago Hollywood was A+.
    Now they are D+.

    Four months ago Cascade was A-.
    Now they are D.


    What do they have in common? Could it be management? I have no interactions with Lenny, but I know for a fact that Hollywood had the used car sales mentality written all over it. From what I hear Lenny fits that category quite well.

    Any other A books with comparable management? Or other signs that these books were more vulnerable than their rating suggested?
    Last edited by Dark Horse; 04-12-07 at 10:31 PM.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 12/14/2005


  2. #2

    Default

    They were always vulnerable and never considered real big time books

    SBR Founder Join Date: 7/20/2005


  3. #3

    Default

    They were also both reduced juice.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 12/14/2005


  4. #4

    Default

    Just curious....Any books gone the other way recently and managed to somehow improve dramatically, at least with regards to SBR ratings?

    SBR Founder Join Date: 9/21/2005


  5. #5

    Default

    Good question

    maybe SIA?

    SBR Founder Join Date: 7/20/2005


  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jjgold View Post
    Good question

    maybe SIA?
    Seem to have risen slighty over the past while JJ, at least looking back on ratings history. I notice that a book I used to have an account with (Sportbet) was once more or less blacklisted, a far cry from it's present "B" rating.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 9/21/2005


  7. #7

    Default

    I am actually surprised it hasn't been more books. Both of these books likely used Neteller for fund transfers more than anything else, Cascade for sure. So when Neteller goes, so goes the ability to continue business as usual.

    That said lots of books were in a similar situation and they haven't experienced this much of a drop off.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lakerfan View Post
    I am actually surprised it hasn't been more books. Both of these books likely used Neteller for fund transfers more than anything else, Cascade for sure. So when Neteller goes, so goes the ability to continue business as usual.

    That said lots of books were in a similar situation and they haven't experienced this much of a drop off.
    I'm surprised the books are doing as well as they are ( still in business), some must just be radically downsizing. I thought it would be much worse.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  9. #9

    Default

    It would really be in all the books' best interest to allow widespread book-to-book transfers for the players.

    I assume many players used Neteller and the like as much for cash management, as they did for taking their funds home.

    With liberal book-to-book policies, the pure money movement could be handled inter-book (they could even charge a modest fee to help keep food on their table), and the player's personal rake could come via whatever method - even check by mail.
    400pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/10/2012


  10. #10

  11. #11

    Default

    Hollywood is a different story - they were sold (And announced publicly) and immediately downgraded I think to C or C-...

    Cascade on the other hand has just sunk.

    Sean

Top