View New Posts
  1. #1

    Default Why isn't this miserable woman in prison now?

    The broad who accused the Duke lacrosse players..

    So she just gets to walk away like nothing happened? This miserable woman ruined the lives of so many people, her lies and fake ass stories cost the family members of the accused millions of dollars in legal fees, and completely messed up the lives of the accused..

    She is the real criminal.. Won't pay a dime for this will she?
    Attached Images  

    SBR Founder Join Date: 11/16/2005


  2. #2

    Default What a credible person she was

    In 2002, she stole a taxi from a man to whom she was giving a lap dance. A high speed chase then ensued, and when the deputy chasing her approached the stolen taxi on foot, she tried to run over him. She pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges of larceny, speeding to elude arrest, assault on a government official and driving while impaired. She was sentenced to 3 weekends in detention


    She had made a similar claim in the past which she did not pursue. "On Aug. 18, 1996, the dancer - then 18 years old - told a police officer in Creedmoor she had been raped by three men in June 1993, according to a police document. She did not pursue the allegations. The officer who took the woman's report 10 years ago asked her to write a detailed timeline of the night's events and bring the account back to the police. "Apparently she never returned," Granville County DA Sam Currin said



    According to the Platinum Club owner, the accuser danced at the club on March 23, 24, and 25. Those were the same dates she told doctors she was "in excruciating pain from the ... beating." The owner said the accuser did not say anything about being raped 10 days earlier.[30] Similarly, 60 Minutes released a video of her allegedly dancing at the club less than two weeks after the alleged incident, again leading to the media doubting how traumatized and in pain she actually was.[31]

    SBR Founder Join Date: 11/16/2005


  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by imgv94 View Post
    The broad who accused the Duke lacrosse players..
    Imus should have called HER a "nappy headed ho" ... even Sharpton might have agreed on this one.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/1/2005


  4. #4

    Default

    ****ing Jesse Jackson said he was going to give her a full scholarship for college last year.
    Sad.

    What a Nappi-headed Hoe she is!

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/30/2005


  5. #5

    Default

    Jesse Jackson's 'Hymietown' Remark – 1984

    Rev. Jesse Jackson referred to Jews as "Hymies" and to New York City as "Hymietown" in January 1984 during a conversation with a black Washington Post reporter, Milton Coleman. Jackson had assumed the references would not be printed because of his racial bond with Coleman, but several weeks later Coleman permitted the slurs to be included far down in an article by another Post reporter on Jackson's rocky relations with American Jews.
    A storm of protest erupted, and Jackson at first denied the remarks, then accused Jews of conspiring to defeat him. The Nation of Islam's radical leader Louis Farrakhan, an aggressive anti-Semite and old Jackson ally, made a difficult situation worse by threatening Coleman in a radio broadcast and issuing a public warning to Jews, made in Jackson's presence: "If you harm this brother [Jackson], it will be the last one you harm." Finally, Jackson doused the fires in late February with an emotional speech admitting guilt and seeking atonement before national Jewish leaders in a Manchester, New Hampshire synagogue. Yet Jackson refused to denounce Farrakhan, and lingering, deeply rooted suspicions have led to an enduring split between Jackson and many Jews. The frenzy also heightened tensions between Jackson and the mostly white establishment press.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 11/16/2005


  6. #6

    Default

    These black racists are comical...........to say the least.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 9/8/2005


  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by imgv94 View Post
    Jesse Jackson's 'Hymietown' Remark – 1984
    What is your point with that quote? From the insults you have liberally dished out on here, including calling someone a "Jew bastard", I would have thought you'd be the last person to pick up on someone else's unfortunate choice of phrase.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tacomax View Post
    What is your point with that quote? From the insults you have liberally dished out on here, including calling someone a "Jew bastard", I would have thought you'd be the last person to pick up on someone else's unfortunate choice of phrase.
    Sometimes I forget how out of touch with reality some people on here are.. Taco you have no common sense and zero sense of humor. That comment was said out of of jest.. Nothing serious, wasn't an insult whatsoever.. Do you even remember the story behind it?

    The person I sent that comment too sure doesn't seem to care.. I wonder why?

    Maybe cause he realized it was out of jest and I wasn't serious about it. I did give him a positive rep vote at the same time..

    Wake up..

    SBR Founder Join Date: 11/16/2005


  9. #9

    Default

    That was just one example, which fitted in with the Jewish story you posted. There are numerous other examples of insults hurled at other people, including me in particular - were they in jest as well? You might want to make sure your own house is in order before having a pop at other people. Just a thought.

    And back to the thread, why the hatred against this particular person? If she did make this story up then why get angry at her? You should be getting angry at the people who allowed this whole spectacle to develop in the first place. If more people ditched the pitchfork mentality and actually realised that it isn't the individual person at fault but the systems in place that allow that individual to do what they did then society might actually change for the better. Your hatred shouldn't be aimed at her - it should be aimed at the current system. And if enough people complain about those, maybe things might change in the future.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  10. #10

    Default

    I understand what you are saying, and yes the D.A is even more in fault. But she is the one key figure in this whole debacle that will be least affected..

    She was a broken down crazy beeitch before this happened and she brought down a lot of people..

    She is the root of this.. but I do understand your point.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 11/16/2005


  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by imgv94 View Post
    I understand what you are saying, and yes the D.A is even more in fault. But she is the one key figure in this whole debacle that will be least affected..
    You've kind of got it. But not got it. The DA is more at fault - why not have a go at them for letting this thing happen in the first place? If they had the adequate systems in place, this whole spectacle would never have happened to the degree it has done.

    Quote Originally Posted by imgv94 View Post
    She was a broken down crazy beeitch before this happened and she brought down a lot of people..

    She is the root of this.. but I do understand your point.
    As above - it's irrelevant what she did or she didn't do. If people voiced their anger at the system rather than the individual person who is able to exploit the system then maybe things would be better for everyone.

    I'm in California at the moment and I'm always hearing about people who are against immigrants who exploit the healthcare system. And it's the same people who exploit the tax system to pay a lot less than they should do.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  12. #12

    Default

    She needs to get prosecuted for lying about that police report.

    That D.A. should get thrown out of the BAR for trying to cover up everything. All that guy did was smile in front of the cameras in order to help his re-election bid. Now he's no where to be found when everyone is trying to contact him for comments.

    The Dean of Duke U should probably resign over this scandal, because he prematurely did what he did to the lacrosse team. Now we all know if that was the basketball team this happen to it would have all been swept under the rug in the first place there.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  13. #13
    Ganchrow's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-28-05
    Posts: 5,014
    SBR Points: 119
    Message Me

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tacomax View Post
    I'm in California at the moment.
    You and imgv should meet up for Sunday brunch.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/28/2005


  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bigboydan View Post
    She needs to get prosecuted for lying about that police report.
    Kerrrrr-ching.

    Quote Originally Posted by bigboydan View Post
    That D.A. should get thrown out of the BAR for trying to cover up everything. All that guy did was smile in front of the cameras in order to help his re-election bid. Now he's no where to be found when everyone is trying to contact him for comments.
    Kerrrrr-ching.

    Quote Originally Posted by bigboydan View Post
    The Dean of Duke U should probably resign over this scandal, because he prematurely did what he did to the lacrosse team. Now we all know if that was the basketball team this happen to it would have all been swept under the rug in the first place there.
    Kerrrrr-ching.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ganchrow View Post
    You and imgv should meet up for Sunday brunch.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ganchrow View Post
    You and imgv should meet up for Sunday brunch.


    Now thats an instant classic

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bigboydan View Post
    Now thats an instant classic
    He's a right stirrer, that Ganchrow.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  18. #18

    Default

    If she did make this story up then why get angry at her?
    That is one of the stupidest statements I have ever seen on the forums. It fits right in with the deflection of personal responsibility going on in this country.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 9/8/2005


  19. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by homedog View Post
    That is one of the stupidest statements I have ever seen on the forums. It fits right in with the deflection of personal responsibility going on in this country.
    Really? One of the stupidest statements you have ever seen? I don't think you've been around forums that much.

    My take is that if someone is taking advantage of a system then you should turn your hatred to the system for letting it happen in the first place rather than the individual person. If you don't agree then I'm more than willing to hear your opinions on it.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  20. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tacomax View Post
    Really? One of the stupidest statements you have ever seen? I don't think you've been around forums that much.

    My take is that if someone is taking advantage of a system then you should turn your hatred to the system for letting it happen in the first place rather than the individual person. If you don't agree then I'm more than willing to hear your opinions on it.
    Okay, I haven't been around the forums much

    Regardless, you say that she is not responsible for lying about a situation that, if believed to be true, destroys the lives of those she accuses.

    How can you defend that?

    The answer is you can only defend that if you relieve the responsibility for the action from her and place it elsewhere.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 9/8/2005


  21. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by homedog View Post
    Okay, I haven't been around the forums much
    Never mind. I forgive you.

    Quote Originally Posted by homedog View Post
    Regardless, you say that she is not responsible for lying about a situation that, if believed to be true, destroys the lives of those she accuses.

    How can you defend that?
    No. If you actually understood what I wrote (which I think you're having problems with) then I said that the responsibility lies with the system rather than this individual person. If the system prevented someone from making these accusations and then the alleged culprits being publically named then this never would have been an issue.

    Quote Originally Posted by homedog View Post
    The answer is you can only defend that if you relieve the responsibility for the action from her and place it elsewhere.
    The answer is that the innocent should not be named unless they are guilty. Let someone make accusations all they want - but ensure that if the accused are innocent then their names are never made public. If you disagree with that then there really is no hope for you.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  22. #22

    Default

    Responsibilty always lies with the individual. If you don't understand that then you are the one that is hopeless.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 9/8/2005


  23. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by homedog View Post
    Responsibilty always lies with the individual. If you don't understand that then you are the one that is hopeless.
    And if the system continually enables the individual to get away with whatever they want then you're saying that the fault is with the individual rather than the system?

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  24. #24

    Default

    It's both parties fault.

    They need to change the laws in order to stop that type of stuff. Another thing they need to do is put term limits in for D.A.'s. That way this type of stuff wouldn't happen as much as it has. Just because this case was so high profile doesn't exclude the fact that this is the first time that stuff like that was actually covered up I'm sure.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  25. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tacomax View Post
    And if the system continually enables the individual to get away with whatever they want then you're saying that the fault is with the individual rather than the system?
    Yes, I am.

    If the system enables me to commit murder, I am no less guilty. Committing murder is wrong, regardless of what the "system" says. It is all about personal responsibililty.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 9/8/2005


  26. #26

    Default

    For all your attendance on forums, as you seem to claim, I don't think you can actually understand what I'm saying.

    Murder is wrong. I'm not going to dispute that. But do you think that someone accused of murder (who might be totally innocent) should have their name printed on newspapers throughout the country until the actual court verdict is reached?

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  27. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tacomax View Post
    For all your attendance on forums, as you seem to claim, I don't think you can actually understand what I'm saying.

    Murder is wrong. I'm not going to dispute that. But do you think that someone accused of murder (who might be totally innocent) should have their name printed on newspapers throughout the country until the actual court verdict is reached?
    No, I never said that. Seems like you are getting on the other side of the argument now.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 9/8/2005


  28. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by homedog View Post
    No, I never said that. Seems like you are getting on the other side of the argument now.
    I'm not sure you're understanding my point at all. What are you unable to follow? I'll reprise it for you.

    1) The system should never have let this come as far as it did.

    2) The accused should never have been named in public until such time they were proved to be guilty.

    If you can't follow what I'm saying then maybe a "Where's Wally" book might be the best option for you. I'm sure you'll find it a struggle - but you'll get there in then end. Or possibly not.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  29. #29

    Default

    the truth is we don't know what happened that night at duke university. just because someone is found 'not guilty' or just because the charges are dropped, it does not mean that a crime did not take place. it simply means that there was not enough evidence for a jury to convict, or not enough evidence for the d.a. to take it to trial

  30. #30

    Default

    collegebasket- have you read anything about this case? this whole thing was bullshit from the start. the north carolina a.g. called neifong a rougue da for his actions here. everyone wanted to help the poor little black girl that was taken advantage of by theese rich duke guys with out looking into the chance that this "accuser" was a lying worthless nappy headed ho.

  31. #31

    Default

    And our armed services let her join them.Can you say affirmative action run amuck?I know guys that were in shape physically and mentally who had high insteps that the service didn't accept but if you a nappy headed ho you get on the armed services fast track to promotions.Hmmmm,that would be fun as a guy soldier to be a part of having her back you up in a firefight.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 11/16/2005


  32. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by imgv94 View Post
    The broad who accused the Duke lacrosse players..

    So she just gets to walk away like nothing happened? This miserable woman ruined the lives of so many people, her lies and fake ass stories cost the family members of the accused millions of dollars in legal fees, and completely messed up the lives of the accused..

    She is the real criminal.. Won't pay a dime for this will she?
    One ugly looking piece of Shit. I can't read this thread anymore seeing that ugly looking face.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


Top