View New Posts
12
  1. #1

    Default NBA really is fixed. Tim Donaghy's new book claims refs manipulated games.

    On his fellow referees:

    Dick Bavetta



    Crawford wanted the game over quickly so he could kick back, relax, and have a beer; [Dick Bavetta] wanted it to keep going so he could hear his name on TV. He actually paid an American Airlines employee to watch all the games he worked and write down everything the TV commentators said about him. No matter how late the game was over, he'd wake her up for a full report. He loved the attention.

    I remember one nightmarish game I worked with Joe Crawford and Phil Robinson. Minnesota and New Orleans were in a tight game going into the last minute, and Crawford told us to make sure that we were 100 percent sure of the call every time we blew the whistle. When play resumed, Minnesota coach Flip Saunders started yelling at us to make a call. Robinson got intimidated and blew the whistle on New Orleans. The only problem was it wasn't the right call. Tim Floyd, the Hornets' coach, went nuts. He stormed the court and kicked the ball into the top row of the stadium. Robinson had to throw him out, and Minnesota won the game.
    [...]
    Later that week, Ronnie Nunn told me that we could have made something up at the other end against Minnesota to even things out. He even got specific-maybe we should have considered calling a traveling violation on Kevin Garnett. Talk about the politics of the game! Of course the official statement from the league office will always read, "There is no such thing as a makeup call."

    That very first time Jack and I bet on an NBA game, Dick was on the court. The team we picked lost the game, but it covered the large point spread and that's how we won the money. Because of the matchup that night, I had some notion of who might win the game, but that's not why I was confident enough to pull the trigger and pick the other team. The real reason I picked the losing team was that I was just about certain they would cover the spread, no matter how badly they played. That is where Dick Bavetta comes into the picture.

    From my earliest involvement with Bavetta, I learned that he likes to keep games close, and that when a team gets down by double-digit points, he helps the players save face. He accomplishes this act of mercy by quietly, and frequently, blowing the whistle on the team that's having the better night. Team fouls suddenly become one-sided between the contestants, and the score begins to tighten up. That's the way Dick Bavetta referees a game-and everyone in the league knew it.

    Fellow referee Danny Crawford attended Michael Jordan's Flight School Camp years ago and later told me that he had long conversations with other referees and NBA players about how Bavetta propped up weak teams. Danny told me that Jordan himself said that everyone in the league knew that Bavetta cheated in games and that the players and coaches just hoped he would be cheating for them on game night. Cheating? That's a very strong word to use in any sentence that includes the name Dick Bavetta. Is the conscious act of helping a team crawl back into a contest "cheating"? The credo of referees from high school to the NBA is "call them like you see them." Of course, that's a lot different than purposely calling more fouls against one team as opposed to another. Did Bavetta have a hidden agenda? Or was he the ultimate company man, making sure the NBA and its fans got a competitive game most times he was on
    the court?

    Studying under Dick Bavetta for 13 years was like pursuing a graduate degree in advanced game manipulation. He knew how to marshal the tempo and tone of a game better than any referee in the league, by far. He also knew how to take subtle-and not so subtle-cues from the NBA front office and extend a playoff series or, worse yet, change the complexion of that series.

    The 2002 Western Conference Finals between the Los Angeles Lakers and the Sacramento Kings presents a stunning example of game and series manipulation at its ugliest. As the teams prepared for Game 6 at the Staples Center, Sacramento had a 3–2 lead in the series. The referees assigned to work Game 6 were Dick Bavetta, Bob Delaney, and Ted Bernhardt. As soon as the referees for the game were chosen, the rest of us knew immediately that there would be a Game 7. A prolonged series was good for the league, good for the networks, and good for the game. Oh, and one more thing: it was great for the big-market, star-studded Los Angeles Lakers.

    In the pregame meeting prior to Game 6, the league office sent down word that certain calls-calls that would have benefitted the Lakers — were being missed by the referees. This was the type of not-so-subtle information that I and other referees were left to interpret. After receiving the dispatch, Bavetta openly talked about the fact that the league wanted a Game 7.

    "If we give the benefit of the calls to the team that's down in the series, nobody's going to complain. The series will be even at three apiece, and then the better team can win Game 7," Bavetta stated.

    As history shows, Sacramento lost Game 6 in a wild come-from-behind thriller that saw the Lakers repeatedly sent to the foul line by the referees. For other NBA referees watching the game on television, it was a shameful performance by Bavetta's crew, one of the most poorly officiated games of all time.


    The 2002 series certainly wasn't the first or last time Bavetta weighed in on an important game. He also worked Game 7 of the 2000 Western Conference Finals between the Lakers and the Trail Blazers. The Lakers were down by 13 at the start of the fourth quarter when Bavetta went to work. The Lakers outscored Portland 31–13 in the fourth quarter and went on to win the game and the series. It certainly didn't hurt the Lakers that they got to shoot 37 free throws compared to a paltry 16 for the Trail Blazers.

    Two weeks before the 2003–04 season ended, Bavetta and I were assigned to officiate a game in Oakland. That afternoon before the tip-off, we were discussing an upcoming game on our schedule. It was the last regular-season game we were scheduled to work, pitting Denver against San Antonio. Denver had lost a game a few weeks prior because of a mistake made by the referees, a loss that could be the difference between them making or missing the playoffs. Bavetta told me Denver needed the win and that it would look bad for the staff and the league if the Nuggets missed the playoffs by one game. There were still a few games left on the schedule before the end of the season, and the standings could potentially change. But on that day in Oakland, Bavetta looked at me and casually stated, "Denver will win if they need the game. That's why I'm on it."

    I was thinking, How is Denver going to win on the road in San Antonio? At the time, the Spurs were arguably the best team in the league. Bavetta answered my question before it was asked.

    "Duncan will be on the bench with three fouls within the first five minutes of the game," he calmly stated.

    Bavetta went on to inform me that it wasn't the first time the NBA assigned him to a game for a specific purpose. He cited examples, including the 1993 playoff series when he put New Jersey guard Drazen Petrovic on the bench with quick fouls to help Cleveland beat the Nets. He also spoke openly about the 2002 Los Angeles–Sacramento series and called himself the NBA's "go-to guy."

    As it turned out, Denver didn't need the win after all; they locked up a spot in the playoffs before they got to San Antonio. In a twist of fate, it was the Spurs that ended up needing the win to have a shot at the division title, and Bavetta generously accommodated. In our pregame meeting, he talked about how important the game was to San Antonio and how meaningless it was to Denver, and that San Antonio was going to get the benefit of the calls that night. Armed with this inside information, I called Jack Concannon before the game and told him to bet the Spurs.

    To no surprise, we won big. San Antonio blew Denver out of the building that evening, winning by 26 points. When Jack called me the following morning, he expressed amazement at the way an NBA game could be manipulated. Sobering, yes; amazing, no. That's how the game is played in the National Basketball Association.

    In a follow-up email to the referee staff and the league office, Crawford railed about the lack of respect players had for referees and the NBA's failure to back him up. Then, in a direct shot at the league's embracing of referees like Dick Bavetta, he fired a sharp rebuke:

    "I also told [Stu Jackson] that the staff is an officiating staff of Dick Bavetta's-schmoozing and sucking people's asses to get ahead. Awful, but it is reality."

    Crawford also touched on the fact that he was being excluded from working the playoffs that year:

    "Look on the bright side everybody, MORE playoff games for you guys and Dick, maybe you will get to be crew chief in the 7th game of the Finals, which is a travesty in itself you even being in the Finals."


    ----- More

    Tommy Nunez



    My favorite Tommy Nunez story is from the 2007 playoffs when the San Antonio Spurs were able to get past the Phoenix Suns in the second round. Of course, what many fans didn't know was that Phoenix had someone working against them behind the scenes. Nunez was the group supervisor for that playoff series, and he definitely had a rooting interest.

    Nunez loved the Hispanic community in San Antonio and had a lot of friends there. He had been a referee for 30 years and loved being on the road; in fact, he said that the whole reason he had become a group supervisor was to keep getting out of the house. So Nunez wanted to come back to San Antonio for the conference finals. Plus, he, like many other referees, disliked Suns owner Robert Sarver for the way he treated officials. Both of these things came into play when he prepared the referees for the games in the staff meetings. I remember laughing with him and saying, "You would love to keep coming back here." He was pointing out everything that Phoenix was able to get away with and never once told us to look for anything in regard to San Antonio. Nunez should have a championship ring on his finger.

    Derrick Stafford and Jess Kersey



    Of course, Stafford had some friends in the league, too. I worked a Knicks game in Madison Square Garden with him on February 26, 2007. New York shot an astounding 39 free throws that night to Miami's paltry eight. It seemed like Stafford was working for the Knicks, calling fouls on Miami like crazy. Isiah Thomas was coaching the Knicks, and after New York's four-point victory, a guy from the Knicks came to our locker room looking for Stafford, who was in the shower. He told us that Thomas sent him to retrieve Stafford's home address; apparently, Stafford had asked the coach before the game for some autographed sneakers and jerseys for his kids. Suddenly, it all made sense.

    Referee Jess Kersey was another one of Isiah Thomas' guys. They'd talk openly on the phone as if they had known each other since childhood. Thomas even told Kersey that he was pushing to get Ronnie Nunn removed from the supervisor's job so that Kersey and Dick Bavetta could take over. This sort of thing happened all the time, and I kept waiting for a Knicks game when Stafford, Bavetta, and Kersey were working together. It was like knowing the winning lottery numbers before the drawing!

    Steve Javie



    And then there was the ongoing feud between Javie and 76ers superstar Allen Iverson. The rift was so bad that Philadelphia general manager Billy King often called the league office to complain about Javie's treatment of Iverson during a game.

    Iverson was eventually traded to Denver, and in his first game against his former team, he was tossed after two technicals. Afterward, Iverson implied Javie had a grudge against him, saying, "I thought I got fouled on that play, and I said I thought that he was calling the game personal, and he threw me out. His fuse is real short anyway, and I should have known that I couldn't say anything anyway. It's been something personal with me and him since I got in the league. This was just the perfect game for him to try and make me look bad." The league fined Iverson $25,000 for his comments, but most of the league referees thought the punishment was too lenient and were upset he wasn't suspended. As a result, we collectively decided to dispense a little justice of our own, sticking it to Iverson whenever we could.

    Shortly after the Javie-Iverson incident, I worked a Jazz-Nuggets contest in Denver on January 6, 2007. During the pregame meeting, my fellow referees Bernie Fryer and Gary Zielinski agreed that we were going to strictly enforce the palming rule against Iverson. Palming the ball was something Iverson loved to do, but if he so much as came close to a palm, we were going to blow the whistle. Obviously, our actions were in direct retaliation for Iverson's rant against Javie. True to form, I immediately excused myself and made an important phone call.

    Sticking to our pregame pledge, each of us whistled Iverson for palming in the first quarter-we all wanted in on the fun. The violations seemed to affect Iverson's rhythm and he played terribly that night, shooting 5-for-19 with five turnovers. After getting repeatedly whistled all night long, Iverson approached me in an act of submission.

    "How long am I going to be punished for Javie?" he quietly inquired.

    "Don't know what you're talking about, Allen," I responded.

    http://deadspin.com/5392067/excerpts...nt-you-to-read

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  2. #2

    Default

    I think the book may have gotten canceled

    I want to fukkin read this thing

  3. #3
    G's pks's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-01-09
    Posts: 22,292
    Message Me

    Default

    We are dealing with humans...with money involved...of course some games are fixed!

  4. #4

    Default

    This is not a surprise to anyone who does not have sheeps wool over their eyes, if you think it ends with basketball, specifically NBA you are nuts however I do feel it probably is most common in NBA

  5. #5

    Default

    Basketball is the easiest to fix because of free throws, foul trouble, traveling, etc.

  6. #6

    Default

    Exactly, so many opportunities throughout the game to "even" it out discreetly

  7. #7

    Default

    good stuff

    refs are only human

    and many of us are scum

  8. #8

    Default

    donaghy is a busted cokksucker who owes....he will say absolutely anything in order to sell some books. not that i doubt that officials fix games, but for him to be talking about any other official besides himself is about as fukking low as he could go.

  9. #9

    Default

    Ray it would be tough to fabricate an entire book

    Look at Jose Canseco, everyone thought he was full of shit originally too...

    BTW I'm pretty sure he will not be able to make a cent off the profits of the book, it goes to charity or something since he is a criminal

  10. #10

    Default

    A whistle here and whistle there can change a whole lot in a hoops game in Big ways. I'm glad this is becoming public knowledge to many people who, in the past, would fight tooth and nail in denying that a referee would determine hoops games, esp...NBA, ATS. Gosh I had some big arguments in the past about this with several people in person and on forums. I never really felt that referees cared who won games so much, but did care about the spreads for a variety of reasons, mainly to assure us bettors couldn't ride superior or inferior teams to great wealth. I refer to those making these decisions as 'Suits'.

    Thanks for sharing, Josh.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  11. #11

    Default

    If I was a NBA ref, it might be too tempting... easiest sport to rig because of the pacing, the constant judgment calls, etc etc.

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The General View Post
    A whistle here and whistle there can change a whole lot in a hoops game in Big ways. I'm glad this is becoming public knowledge to many people who, in the past, would fight tooth and nail in denying that a referee would determine hoops games, esp...NBA, ATS. Gosh I had some big arguments in the past about this with several people in person and on forums. I never really felt that referees cared who won games so much, but did care about the spreads for a variety of reasons, mainly to assure us bettors couldn't ride superior or inferior teams to great wealth. I refer to those making these decisions as 'Suits'.

    Thanks for sharing, Josh.



    Spread seems more difficult to rig. I would definitely stick with the totals. Pretty easy to nail an over if you are blowing a whistle every other drive.

  13. #13

    Default

    Think about...there are soooo many judgement calls in the NBA. In the NFL, because of instant replay it's pretty hard to mess up a call without being lambasted nationally the next day. Though in the NFL the lines crew is perhaps a bit biased seeing as how they are payed by the home team and then run across the field with the stick in their hands trying to run as straight as possible, and then the ref sticks up his fingers and there is like a centimeter to get the first down...

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chi_archie View Post
    good stuff

    refs are only human

    and many of us are scum

    I absolutely love to quote a liberal. The irony here is that a liberal will usually lather on about the goodness of human nature... yet in actions be scum. Here we have a liberal despising human nature.... lol, this quite the interesting tidbit.

    In any event, that Sac-LA game was surely fixed. Saw it myself and couldn't believe it at the time.... BUT... I have never seen a game so ridiculously fixed as a college game that took place in the Garden about 4 years ago.

    It was absolutely, unbelievably the most clear-cut case of a fix ever.

    ANyways, let's not forget Duke home games where coach Big Polish Nose has the refs in chains and a ball stuffed in their mouth... hell, the guy even fainted when he didn't get the 37th ft awarded in the first half.

  15. #15

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by onthewhat View Post
    Ray it would be tough to fabricate an entire book

    Look at Jose Canseco, everyone thought he was full of shit originally too...

    BTW I'm pretty sure he will not be able to make a cent off the profits of the book, it goes to charity or something since he is a criminal
    not sure what you are talking about. i didnt say i doubt that refs fix spreads... we have all seen enough to know that they do. what im saying is that the guy is a piece of shit for ratting out other refs. and actually, canseco had the drug test reports to back his statements...all donaghy has is his word and we all know thats not worth anything. if the book makes it, the proceeds will first go to pay lawyer fees and other debts i read. im sure a charity will get something afterwards. the guy fukked up and is going to try and drag others down for something he got caught doing. i agree though, i would love to read it too

  17. #17

    Default

    NBA threatened to sue Random House, and they dropped the book project. Now he is having to shop it around to other publishers. The thing is Random House claimed to fact checked it and researched it as much as possible. I am sure some publisher will pick it up.

    General, I remember when I first started reading your posts. You were well aware of the ref fixing in the NBA before most bettors and posters. That was almost a decade ago.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  18. #18

    Default

    Doesn't it seem that Tim is very much risking his own safety by blowing this whistle? Or maybe the safety of someone he loves.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  19. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JoshW View Post
    NBA threatened to sue Random House, and they dropped the book project. Now he is having to shop it around to other publishers. The thing is Random House claimed to fact checked it and researched it as much as possible. I am sure some publisher will pick it up.

    General, I remember when I first started reading your posts. You were well aware of the ref fixing in the NBA before most bettors and posters. That was almost a decade ago.
    Yeah Josh, I recall when I used to hesitate bringing the topic up because it always lead to a big argument and me being slandered from many directions. People thought I was insane for thinking NBA game results were being determined by officials blowing that whistle here and there (Not denying I am insane. The proof is all over). It'd be fun to go back and read some of those old posts when several of us were debating this topic.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  20. #20

    Default

    What sold me, at least from the excerpts I read, is the fact that there isn't any sensationalizing going on. An NBA ref with a gambling problem saw situations where he knew that either by referee bias or league cues that a game would be officiated a certain way; he passed along this information and bet it himself.

    This doesn't sound like a whistle crazy guy that was covertly trying to manufacture games on his own accord, it sounds like a guy that was merely out to cash in on his insider knowledge, and that's likely why he avoided detection for so long.

  21. #21

    Default

    I pretty much agree with everything you said Lou

  22. #22
    BobHarvey's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 07-08-08
    Posts: 3,936
    SBR Points: 132
    Message Me

    Default

    That's a great read. I hope he gets the book published.

  23. #23

    Default

    The problem with most peoples' argument when it comes to fixing games is that they mostly blame players. The NBA is rare in that referees have a great impact on the outcome of games. The difference between a no-call and a foul is completely arbitrary from play to play. In no other sport can the refs have such an impact. It is mandatory that you cap officials as well as players in the NBA.

  24. #24

    Default

    People have been calling me a cynic for years when I said all the NBA cares about is extending series. I'm glad that I get atleast a little personal vindication. **** the nba and david stern.

  25. #25

    Default

    Perhaps even more so....notice how if a Star player is having an off night they will put them on the line no matter what (think lebron) they will rarely let Lebron not either get his points or his FT attempts...it is all about stars and nba.

  26. #26

    Default

    the 'star' factor is disgusting.

    just watch any Iverson game... and then watch a 3-month when it needs it's diaper changed or needs fed... same behavior.

    Watching a guy 6'10, 260 cry on like a baby... it seems rather odd to me.

  27. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by raydog View Post
    not sure what you are talking about. i didnt say i doubt that refs fix spreads... we have all seen enough to know that they do. what im saying is that the guy is a piece of shit for ratting out other refs. and actually, canseco had the drug test reports to back his statements...all donaghy has is his word and we all know thats not worth anything. if the book makes it, the proceeds will first go to pay lawyer fees and other debts i read. im sure a charity will get something afterwards. the guy fukked up and is going to try and drag others down for something he got caught doing. i agree though, i would love to read it too
    good points. Obviously this guy is of a high moral character.

    But yeah, something's wrong with a game that has 50 penalties a night. Change the ****ing rules on this thing, it's impossible to watch.

  28. #28
    yisman's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 42,082
    SBR Points: 925
    Message Me

    Default

    I read most of it. He uses "paltry" too often.
    150pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY7th Place 5/29/2012

    663pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/20/2012

    5,880

    SBR POKER TOP 100

    96th Place 11/1/2011

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Casino 10/31/2011


  29. #29

    Default

    donaghy is now a hero; he's going to get murdered for this, but good to see everything out in the open

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/25/2005


  30. #30

    Default

    Nuggets/Lakers Game 5 in LA was very controversial. A game where Denver had alot of momentum late in the 1st quarter and Chauncey Billups was forced to the bench after picking up two very questionable ticky tack offensive fouls. When Denver retained the lead again early in the 4th, ticky tack fouls were caledl against Denver bigs, that eventually put the Lakers in the stripes early.

  31. #31

    Default

    Not really a surprise what he had to say. I think all of us gamblers think the NBA is fixed on some level.

  32. #32

    Default

    dont follow nba that much, but this is a shocking read to me

    i love the way he ties in ref selections to his betting, what human wouldnt be tempted by this armed with that knowledge

  33. #33
    yisman's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 42,082
    SBR Points: 925
    Message Me
    150pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY7th Place 5/29/2012

    663pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/20/2012

    5,880

    SBR POKER TOP 100

    96th Place 11/1/2011

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Casino 10/31/2011


  34. #34

    Default

    yeah, he already dropped some gems for us, but now these crooked refs probably will overcompensate

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/25/2005


  35. #35

    Default

    reading the first section on gambling reffs I'm thinking this is JJ Gold writing style. How's he involved? Are these the guys he plays spike the dick with?

12 Last
Top