[Newguyintown]

Hello Guys

Is it standard to for rollovers to build on themselves? Let's say you deposit 5K and have a 10x rollover. Your balance goes down to $200 so you reup and get the same 10x rollover deal. So since the funds are commingled and you never busted, do you really have a 20x rollover on these funds?

That is what I'm getting. I have built up an outrageous rollover because I kept "busting" over and over again (but still had money in my account).

NG

[slash]

As long as you don't completely bust out, many books have that rule.

[Korchnoi]

it's probably worth making a fuss about. they probably think they want to keep you as a customer.

[slash]

it's probably worth making a fuss about. they probably think they want to keep you as a customer.

Just because he "loses" his money scalping doesn't make him a good customer.

[Korchnoi]

Just because he "loses" his money scalping doesn't make him a good customer.

I wrote: Originally Posted by Korchnoi
it's probably worth making a fuss about. they probably think they want to keep you as a customer.

they probably THINK you're a good customer. we're on the same page here.

Look, if they value you as a customer, they may give you a break. If they don't, they won't. It's worth a shot -- it's a freeroll.

[pags11]

this is a question I often have myself...I'd like to hear a view on this from Bill and John (or others with knowledge on the subject)...

[tacomax]

As long as you don't completely bust out, many books have that rule.

And some books do have the rule even when you do bust out. As always, it's always best to check before you accept a bonus, especially when you've got an outstanding balance there.