| SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks Recommended Books | ||
| 1. Pinnacle Sports | SBR Rating A+ | Pinnacle Sports Review |
| 2. The Greek Sports Book | SBR Rating A+ | The Greek Review |
| 3. BookMaker | SBR Rating A+ | BookMaker Review |
| 4. BetJamaica | SBR Rating A+ | BetJamaica Review |
| 5. LegendZ Sports | SBR Rating A+ | LegendZ Review |
| SBR Posters' Poll - March 2009 View Complete Results | ||
| 1. BetJamaica | 251 total points | BetJamaica Review |
| 2. The Greek Sports Book | 217 total points | The Greek Review |
| 3. 5Dimes | 181 total points | 5Dimes Review |
| 4. Matchbook | 159 total points | Matchbook Review |
| 5. Pinnacle Sports | 148 total points | Pinnacle Sports Review |
![]() |
View New Posts |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | ||||
|
12.22.2006 (02:36 AM CST)
SportsInteraction (SBR rating C-) confiscates over $5,000 in player winnings. The sportsbook states that the account was the 2nd from the same household and the first account holder had already been removed from book due to sharp play. SBR Justin investigated the player’s dispute and found that the sportsbook did not list any rules prohibiting multiple users from the same household. SportsInteraction has taken steps to avoid similar disputes in the future by adding the following rule: Only one Sports Interaction account per household or computer environment is permitted. A ’computer environment’ is one where multiple computers are located in one building. If fraudulent accounts are found in one household or computer environment, the other accounts in that household or computer environment will be held liable for any returned funds and the account balances will reflect this. Due to the fact that this rule did not exist prior to winnings confiscation and that family members have played at SIA in the past, SBR has argued that winnings should be honored. Current SIA players should take note of the book’s newly defined stance on more than one user per residence. (edit) to clarify, SIA states that one person was operating both accounts. |
||||
|
|
#2 | ||||
|
One clarification. SIA management pointed out that this player's account was confiscated for violating its "alias account" rule. They claim this account was being used by the player's brother, whom they had thrown out several months earlier.
In no instance did this player ever bet beyond SIA's limits alone or in conjunction with others. He denies it is an "alias account". |
||||
|
|
#3 | |||||
|
Quote:
How do they know ? |
|||||
|
|
#4 | ||||
|
these guys are getting worse daily...
|
||||
|
|
#5 | ||||
|
Will never mess with them again.. Goodbye SIA
|
||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|