[Nicky Santoro]

This is only done in baseball

betting streak teams ONLY.

IF a team has won at least 2 in a row, bet 1 unit on them.
IF a team has lost 2 or more in a row, bet 1 unit against them.

IF 2 teams are playing each other and both are on a winning streak of at least 2 games.. DO NOT PLAY IT

IF 2 teams are playing each other and both are on a losing streak of at least 2 games, DO NOT PLAY IT..

IF 1 team has won at least 2 in a row is playing a team that has lost at least 2 in row, you now bet 1.5 units on this.

If you stick to this a whole season and bet it at the best #, and NEVER chase, you should show a profit.


Boys, this is a proven winner. my buddies are up big lifetime on this. they ONLY had 1 losing season thus far, and it was a very small loss.. and i won in the only year i did it.. Nothing is guaranteed in life, but i know these guys are up big lifetime doing this..

Do what you want with this..

[themajormt]

Why couldnt you have said this before the Rockies won 1000 games in a row this year Nicky???

[paco]

Beating the closing. # is all that matters.

[pavyracer]

Originally Posted by paco

Beating the closing. # is all that matters.

Exactly. All beating the closing number bets at my book are winners and paid promptly. Thanks Nickay!

[Nicky Santoro]

Originally Posted by pavyracer

Exactly. All beating the closing number bets at my book are winners and paid promptly. Thanks Nickay!

paver, when i saw your name on this post, how did i know you would say exactly that?? paver, stop being so predictable.. you've said the same joke now for the last 19 posts to me.. paver, use your imagination.. you have one of the great minds here at sbr.. take advantage of it.

btw, if you beat the closing # consistently, you will indeed make money in gambling.. try it paver, you will see i'm right. and stop being a pussy and try it for yourself.. this way, you will stop mocking me all the time..

[RealSlimShady]

Nicky, I have heard of this system. However, people I know bet the streaks for 3 games rather than 2(basically what you wrote, but 3 games instead of 2). They also don't increase the bet size to 1.5 units when a streaking losing team plays a streaking winning team. They tell me it has been profitable over time.

[pavyracer]

Here is a better system for baseball:

Play the team that lost the first two games at home on a 3 game series to win the final game. Very rarely teams sweep on the road

[smitch124]

I liked tip #5.47B better...

[onthewhat]

[durito]

Do you have any data to support this?

[jjgold]

Great info Nicky

this type if info is very valuable

[tacomax]

Originally Posted by durito

Do you have any data to support this?

Come on, durito. Please re-read the post. His buddies are up big lifetime on this.

Originally Posted by Nicky Santoro

Boys, this is a proven winner. my buddies are up big lifetime on this. they ONLY had 1 losing season thus far, and it was a very small loss.. and i won in the only year i did it.. Nothing is guaranteed in life, but i know these guys are up big lifetime doing this..

[onthewhat]

Originally Posted by durito

Do you have any data to support this?

When are you going to ask guys like Vegas Dave if they have any data to support their dumb ass claims?

[lakerboy]

I AGREE WITH nICKY BUT I STILL WONT BET ON BASEBALL

[Bread]

If anyone is interested in some fail proof tips on how to go 1-3 most days, PM me immediately!!

[onthewhat]

Bread you may be a better capper while intoxicated

[Nicky Santoro]

it's a proven fact boys.. i have 2 buddies that do this each season and these guys drive lamboghini's..

try it and you'll thank me.. MUST be at the best price, do NOT chase and follow the system to a tee.. and don't quit in the middle of it if you start off slow.. oh, and don't forget to send me my cut of 10% when you win $$..


i gotta run boys..

[onthewhat]

Nicky thanks for the advice

You are a fukkin pro

[durito]

Originally Posted by onthewhat

When are you going to ask guys like Vegas Dave if they have any data to support their dumb ass claims?

What claims would those be?

and since when is VegasDave anything more than the square he admits to be?

[pdx107]

Very interesting idea, I believe I will have to give it a try

[donjuan]

If you try this at widely available (market) prices, you will get crushed. But then anyone with the slightest clue knew that already.

[Sawyer]

This system idea makes sense since baseball is all about streaks. I remember Royals lost 23 (or it was 25?) in a row, LoL!

Riding teams on a 3-game winning streak may be more profitable? Maybe, who knows? It would be great if some one can came up with a record.

According to this system, we must have these games as play for tonight. Correct me please if I'm wrong.

Teams with 2+ Wins: SD, LA, ATL, DET, BOS, TOR, FLA
Teams with 2+ Lost: NYY, PIT, CHC, WAS, CIN, MIL, TEX

2W vs 2L: TOR, BOS, DET, ATL

Do you know the record of this system for last season Nicky? Thanks for sharing.

[Squirrel]

Originally Posted by pavyracer

Here is a better system for baseball:

Play the team that lost the first two games at home on a 3 game series to win the final game. Very rarely teams sweep on the road

I wouldnt say it was rare, in fact, it happened 52 times last year by my count.

Backing the teams with LL in the first 2 games hit 57% on the year, going up to 60% if you just count in-division matchups. Havent got any P/L figures since my eyes are hurtin' from looking at numbers for the past 2 hours!

[Afrot69]

it seems like this year the there have been longer losing streaks than winning streaks so I'd bet on the losing streaks

[Fiasco]

this isn't innovating stuff people...

and most here wouldn't know how to get the best number if their lives depended on it so wouldn't show profits by any means (even if that was all there was to this system...)

Nicky may make it seem easy but it isn't, or everyone here could profit from gambling...

[Nicky Santoro]

if you are playing into thegreek's 20 cent line and doing this, you will lose.

you MUST play into best available #'s only .. this system had ONLY 1 losing season in the last 10 yrs, and i believe it was 2001..


this system is not easy to do.. you must stick to it all year and always get the best #.. if you can pull this off and you won't bet other games on your own and not bet any games when there isn't a play and the game is on tv, then you will win..

[forloveofthegame]

I have found that the best line is usually the night before..is this true? How do you guys go getting the best line

[jjgold]

Originally Posted by Fiasco

this isn't innovating stuff people...

and most here wouldn't know how to get the best number if their lives depended on it so wouldn't show profits by any means (even if that was all there was to this system...)

Nicky may make it seem easy but it isn't, or everyone here could profit from gambling...

Good point and you need to be by a computer day and night. Most could never pull it off.

[rake922]

Originally Posted by Sawyer

This system idea makes sense since baseball is all about streaks. I remember Royals lost 23 (or it was 25?) in a row, LoL!

Riding teams on a 3-game winning streak may be more profitable? Maybe, who knows? It would be great if some one can came up with a record.

According to this system, we must have these games as play for tonight. Correct me please if I'm wrong.

Teams with 2+ Wins: SD, LA, ATL, DET, BOS, TOR, FLA
Teams with 2+ Lost: NYY, PIT, CHC, WAS, CIN, MIL, TEX

2W vs 2L: TOR, BOS, DET, ATL

Do you know the record of this system for last season Nicky? Thanks for sharing.

system went 3-1 on Wednesday

[dreamjob]

More like 4-6. But 3 out of 4 were 1.5 units

[DwightShrute]

also, when the teams play the following night after a slug fest , it tends to be a low scoring game the following night. Or at least under the total. Example Rays and Phillies tonight

[MonkeyF0cker]

Originally Posted by Nicky Santoro

if you are playing into thegreek's 20 cent line and doing this, you will lose.

you MUST play into best available #'s only .. this system had ONLY 1 losing season in the last 10 yrs, and i believe it was 2001..


this system is not easy to do.. you must stick to it all year and always get the best #.. if you can pull this off and you won't bet other games on your own and not bet any games when there isn't a play and the game is on tv, then you will win..

LOL. Why wouldn't you bet every fukkin game at the best number available? Why would you only bet teams on two game streaks at "the best available number?" My God, you have to be the biggest toolbox on the forum.

[MonkeyF0cker]

The only reason you said that is because when someone actually checks the records and proves "your system" is actually a loser, you can say, "But that wasn't with the best number available."

Yet, if you bet EVERY game at "the best available number" you'd be even more profitable. So is there any fukkin point to this thread? Or do you just enjoy embarassing yourself?

[Sawyer]

Originally Posted by rake922

system went 3-1 on Wednesday

Back W2+

SD LOST -100 (+130)
LA LOST -100 (+114)
ATL LOST -100 (+116)
DET WIN +100 (-113)
BOS WIN +100 (-167)
TOR WIN +100 (-135)
FLA WIN +100 (-140)

Favs went 4-0. Dogs are 0-3. Overall 4-3, +100 Units.

Fade L2+

NYY FADE LOST -100(ATL +116)
PIT FADE LOST -100 (CLE +112)
CHC FADE WIN +100 (DET -113)
WAS FADE WIN +100 (BOS -167)
MIL FADE LOST -115 (MIN -115)
TEX FADE LOST -175 (ARI -175)

2-4 Overall, -290 Units.

2W+ vs 2L+

TOR WIN +100
BOS WIN +100
DET WIN +100
ATL LOST -100

Favs 3-0, +300.
3-1 Overall, +200 Units.

[Sawyer]

2W+ VS 2L+

DET +106 (Cubs -3,Det +6)
TOR -120 (Cin -4, Tor +3)
FLA -117 (Bal -2, Fla +4)
KC +104 (Hou -2, KC +2)
BOS -120 (Was -3, Bos +4)