[jjgold]

Are guys that were pros even if they never won, qualifiers, junior type players or big time college tennis as they are in the circles and do have somewhat of a clue about players, ect.

Anyone just looking at stats is going to get killed, it is possible if you had access to tons of tennis on tv from Monday to Sunday watching all rounds you could hold your own also.

[Justin7]

Are guys that were pros even if they never won, qualifiers, junior type players or big time college tennis as they are in the circles and do have somewhat of a clue about players, ect.

Anyone just looking at stats is going to get killed, it is possible if you had access to tons of tennis on tv from Monday to Sunday watching all rounds you could hold your own also.

If you have enough stats and smarts, you can crush any sport. Stat guys get rich in this game.

[flyingillini]

God Bless Justin and your plays for 6/2/09.

[The General]

Glaken was a college player at FSU and was a very good tennis capper. He used to share plays with me and he was real good at knowing talent and situational picks.

I miss Glaken.

[SexyMit]

I bet line movements against the public and make some good coin also.

[HeeeHAWWWW]

Many of the ex-pros tend to be the worst informed about their own sport - so often I hear them talking nonsense on TV. These days I mostly just ignore them.

Agree you do need to keep up to date watching tennis though, otherwise the stats have no grounding to reality. Being able to link subtle qualitative impressions from single matches with the bigger picture you can only get from stats analysis is the route to success imo.