View New Posts
  1. #1

    Canucks +1.5 LOCK OF THE DECADE

    WagerType: Date: Team: Risking / To Win Ticket#:
    STRAIGHT BET Apr 15 NHL [87] VANCOUVER +1½-300 1000.00 SBR / 333.33 SBR 1420078

    I know boys, too much juice to bet but I had to go with it since Van is starting Cory Schneider and actually gives them a chance to win outright.

  2. #2

    I like it. I play some crazy amounts at least once a week or more...LOL

  3. #3

    How do you know they are starting Schneids?

  4. #4

  5. #5

    Why are they starting Schneider? Its not like Luongo has gone into choke mode. If it wasnt for him in game 1 they woulda lost by 5.

  6. #6

    Do like the play but, laying that kinda juice when a simple empty-netter can kill the bet = too risky.

    GL though.

  7. #7

  8. #8

  9. #9

    Luongo has played well I thought.....I do like Schneider though He is from here!

  10. #10

    Trust me boys, desperate times call for Schnides to step in and win...just think back to the regular season when they went into Boston and Chicago with Luoooooo on the bench and they won both those games.

  11. #11
    aggieshawn's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-24-07
    Posts: 2,686
    Message Me

    Really?? I though I was drunk!!
    40pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY12th Place 6/14/2013

    600pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/23/2013

    250pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY4th Place 6/3/2013

    170pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY6th Place 6/17/2013

    200pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 6/13/2013

    40pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY12th Place 6/12/2013


  12. #12

    Canucks have yet to cover the +1.5 in 2 games at home

    Why the hell would they cover now? Especially with a team that is notorious for getting blown out in playoff games?

    Bad bet here.

  13. #13

    Luongo needs a break here and let the back up goalie step up and if he gets a win for Nucks then im sure Luongo will get his ass back in gear and play up. I like the call 100%.

  14. #14

    Come back and tell me the same thing when I cash in.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rich Boy View Post
    Canucks have yet to cover the +1.5 in 2 games at home

    Why the hell would they cover now? Especially with a team that is notorious for getting blown out in playoff games?

    Bad bet here.

  15. #15

    It's not an ideal situation for that kind of bet. If VAN goes down they will have to open up not wanting to go down 3-0 in the series. That'll give LA plenty of odd-man rushes. Plus you always got that nasty empty net bad beat lingering.

    I would never have thought VAN would lose the first two so having "VAN" and "lock" in the same sentence makes no sense. Good luck though as I hope this series goes 7 games.

  16. #16
    PuckIt's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-11-12
    Posts: 7,680
    Message Me

    I think it's stupid, but will probably hit. Kings home games tend to be low scoring and close.

  17. #17

    Good luck to you, I hope you win. You got bigger balls than me, f**kers burned me twice. Might be better to put Schneider on the forward line, seeing nobody else can score.
    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 06/06/2013


  18. #18

    Quote Originally Posted by keyboarding View Post
    It's not an ideal situation for that kind of bet. If VAN goes down they will have to open up not wanting to go down 3-0 in the series. That'll give LA plenty of odd-man rushes. Plus you always got that nasty empty net bad beat lingering.

    I would never have thought VAN would lose the first two so having "VAN" and "lock" in the same sentence makes no sense. Good luck though as I hope this series goes 7 games.
    Thanks bro. "VAN" and "lock" in the same sentence might not make sense but +1.5 for a team that was a favorite to win the series outright is pretty damn close to a lock especially after losing the first 2 games.

  19. #19

    Thanks man

    Quote Originally Posted by swordsandtequila View Post
    Good luck to you, I hope you win. You got bigger balls than me, f**kers burned me twice. Might be better to put Schneider on the forward line, seeing nobody else can score.

  20. #20

    Yeah taking the +1.5 is good till that last 1:30 of the 3rd when that neat is empty. I got screwed twice by that and they were both on the Sharks!

    Sad to say I took sharks +1.5goals tonight to...guess I will never learn...LOL

  21. #21

    More often then not playoff games are usually 1 goal games...not that I'm betting this one strictly because of that reason but I understand your frustration.

  22. #22

    Quote Originally Posted by Gamble32jn View Post
    Yeah taking the +1.5 is good till that last 1:30 of the 3rd when that neat is empty. I got screwed twice by that and they were both on the Sharks!

    Sad to say I took sharks +1.5goals tonight to...guess I will never learn...LOL
    My concern would be that they might pull the goalie even earlier than normal to avoid going down 3-0 in the series.

  23. #23

    Quote Originally Posted by keyboarding View Post
    My concern would be that they might pull the goalie even earlier than normal to avoid going down 3-0 in the series.
    This is all assuming that LA will never trail in the game...what if they are the one's down by one? LOCK CITY

  24. #24

    I would say Under 5 is a safer bet and much less chalk

  25. #25

  26. #26

  27. #27

  28. #28

    Try and stop me tough guy!!
    Quote Originally Posted by paranoyd androyd View Post
    you fukkin idiot stop celebrating

  29. #29

    worst bet ever and this fukkin muppet is celebrating like he actually did something smart

  30. #30

  31. #31

    Quote Originally Posted by paranoyd androyd View Post
    worst bet ever and this fukkin muppet is celebrating like he actually did something smart
    Jealous trolls can't stand to see successful bets...it cashed in, that's all I care about. Now act like a loser and go to bed with your left hand like you always do. Now that's the damn truth.

  32. #32

    The Kings probably should have scored an empty net goal.

Top