View New Posts
123
  1. #36

    Johnathan Quick stands on his head and the kings win in 6 games

    Go kings go !

  2. #37

    Quote Originally Posted by mr. leisure View Post
    Johnathan Quick stands on his head and the kings win in 6 games

    Go kings go !

  3. #38

    4/11/2012 10:35 PM NHL Hockey 886 Vancouver Canucks (Series)* -175 vs Los Angeles Kings (Series)
    Risking $1750.00 To Win $1000.00



  4. #39

    Like LAs chances in this series and is a min 6 maybe 7 game series where the Canucks will probably prevail at home

  5. #40

    Quote Originally Posted by DennisGreen View Post
    4/11/2012 10:35 PM NHL Hockey 886 Vancouver Canucks (Series)* -175 vs Los Angeles Kings (Series)
    Risking $1750.00 To Win $1000.00


    I know you probably think the Canucks are almost a lock to advance far due to last year, but a big 10 units bet on this series I cannot agree with

  6. #41

    Quote Originally Posted by a4u2fear View Post
    I know you probably think the Canucks are almost a lock to advance far due to last year, but a big 10 units bet on this series I cannot agree with
    I know what we got and I know what they got LA is a though.

  7. #42
    BigSpoon's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 11-04-10
    Posts: 1,593
    Betpoints: 9646
    Message Me

    Quote Originally Posted by lakerboy View Post
    I don't agree with you on the Kings beating the Canucks, but damn what a burial that was on Rich Boy.
    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 04/14/2014

    $30
    Charity
    donation 9/2/2013

    $30
    Charity
    donation 9/3/2013


  8. #43

    I will take them per this threads recommendation.

  9. #44

  10. #45

    U have lost your mind laker boy. Canucks take it 4-2

  11. #46

    Quote Originally Posted by BigSpoon View Post
    I don't agree with you on the Kings beating the Canucks, but damn what a burial that was on Rich Boy.
    How do those two threads compare?

  12. #47

    I think LA has a decent chance. Not because they are good but because vancouver could be this years fraud.

  13. #48

  14. #49

    Quote Originally Posted by lunchbawks View Post
    yea the canucks are shit, worst team in hockey
    yes for sure. In fact, they shouldn't be able to participate in the post season

  15. #50

    Quote Originally Posted by lakerboy View Post
    Darryl Sutter is licking his chops at wearing down the pussies from vancouver who cant play physical games over a long series and come out on top.
    WTF Lakerboy. They not only accumulated more points that any other the other teams 2 years in a row over a long hard season and made it to the 7th game in last years final. I suggest that you really don't understand the meaning of the word pussy. I hope you didn't place too much of your money on the series.

  16. #51

  17. #52

    Kings series price +182 (3x)

    Even the flyers are +176

  18. #53

    Dwightshrute we know canucks fans are tough beating down retail shops. Van caved in last year in the final when the going got tough. Sedin twins soft as melted ice cream. Luongo a "sieve" in big games.

    Van is the least feared big 100 point team out there. Kings is the worst matchup for them. Watch and see.

    Kings in 6 games.

  19. #54

    Quote Originally Posted by lakerboy View Post
    Dwightshrute we know canucks fans are tough beating down retail shops. Van caved in last year in the final when the going got tough. Sedin twins soft as melted ice cream. Luongo a "sieve" in big games.

    Van is the least feared big 100 point team out there. Kings is the worst matchup for them. Watch and see.

    Kings in 6 games.
    anything can happen in the NHL playoff as we know but you are so wrong on 2 things you say. Firstly, Sedins? Come on. Was Wayne Gretzky soft? Lemieux? Is Jagr? Of course he wasn't. Not all guys fight. I expect more from posters like you.

    Secondly, Luongo has 60 career shutouts (2nd behind Brodeur I believe) and he helped his team to game 7 of the cup finals with 2 shout outs in the finals.

  20. #55

    Quote Originally Posted by DwightShrute View Post
    anything can happen in the NHL playoff as we know but you are so wrong on 2 things you say. Firstly, Sedins? Come on. Was Wayne Gretzky soft? Lemieux? Is Jagr? Of course he wasn't. Not all guys fight. I expect more from posters like you.

    Secondly, Luongo has 60 career shutouts (2nd behind Brodeur I believe) and he helped his team to game 7 of the cup finals with 2 shout outs in the finals.

    We can argue all day long my friend but luongo was awful in the finals. How many goals did he allow in the other 5 games?

  21. #56


    what a waste of space this thread is...

    You clearly don't know what your talking about lakergirl...

    Stick to the NBA...

  22. #57

    Quote Originally Posted by lakerboy View Post
    i guess you didnt watch the stanley cup final game 7 last year. who loses like that at home in a game 7?

    when the kings finish slapping around the canucks i will remind you how shit van is. a reg season team this year.

    btw is ottawa gonna score 4 or more goals the whole series vs the rangers?
    Your whole argument is flawed.
    You really sound like an idiot.

    I guess we watched the Stanley Cup Final game 7. Which featured Canucks. THey played up until the last game of the year......while every other team in the league was sitting on there ass watching them. They made it that far last year. They will sweep the Kings. If anything that promotes a revenge factor.

    Kings too fast AND too physical for Canucks? Im pretty canucks are one of the fastest teams there are. THey may not fight but they can hit and skate around teams.


    jeez atleast have some good insight.

  23. #58

    Good insight now consists of predicting a 1 seed to sweep a 8 seed. Wow. Last year is so relevant to this year isn't it?


    Nhl playoffs first round is the home of underdogs. Hence the low line on van to open at -165.

    I'm gonna laugh so hard at all the canuck backers when la wins the series.

  24. #59

    Don't bet Kings, just burn your money instead. If it was the Blackhawks, I can see Van having trouble with them, as they've struggled in the past.

    This has 5 game series written all over it. LB your not really using the facts accurately.

  25. #60

    Kings will win the series. Even if they don't ( which I don't which I don't believe at all) I could easily see myself getting van at + money at somepoint in the series and still winning.

  26. #61
    Kindred's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 09-09-08
    Posts: 2,475
    Betpoints: 1588
    Message Me

    Quote Originally Posted by jonorussell View Post
    Canucks 4 - 1 or 4 - 2.

    You don't win the presidents trophy 2 years in a row being shit.
    Presidents trophy is worthless shit...Playoff hockey isn't regular season hockey.
    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 04/14/2014


  27. #62

    Quote Originally Posted by Kindred View Post
    Presidents trophy is worthless shit...Playoff hockey isn't regular season hockey.

    How did they do last year???

    King are a solid squad but they cannot tie the Nucks skates if the Nucks play there game and Luongo plays solid.

    No, good insight is not predicting an underdog to win a series. I love underdogs. Just cause Vancouver seem "square" that does not make them the wrong play in this series.

    Every teams mentality is to try and be physical with Vancouver. Yet there still the best team in hockey over the last few years.

    Kings are a borderline playoff team that without the acquisition they made at the trade deadline they are sitting home right now talking about the offseason.

  28. #63

    Jeff Carters status in this series is huge, without him the Kings do not have a chance.

    If Luongo chokes, no big deal, Canucks have Schneider who has a better save percentage than Quick.

    Canucks are also alot tougher and alot deeper in key positions compared to last year. This year they have extra D-men who can play in case of injuries (Alberts, Rome, Gragnani, Tanev) Ballard is also expected to be back from a concussion. Additions of Kassian, Booth and Weise add the toughness they lacked last season.

    Canucks are a well balanced team, Kings are not, period.

  29. #64

    Quote Originally Posted by lakerboy View Post
    Good insight now consists of predicting a 1 seed to sweep a 8 seed. Wow. Last year is so relevant to this year isn't it?
    If you're being sarcastic then you're a fukking goof. You're biggest criticism of VAN is how they played last year. So if now you're saying it's trivial, then you really are a bigger idiot than most people thought.

    There isn't a single aspect to the game of hockey where LA is better than VAN. Not a single one. From playoff experience to depth to speed to consistency, LA isn't an outright winner in any category.

  30. #65

    You contradict yourself. You mention how bad they are in game 7 of the stanley cup........then you tell me since I believe its a revenge spot for them since theyve been waiting for the playoffs since that embaressment of game 7...........that I am wrong because last year doesnt matter.

  31. #66

    We are going to pound the canucks deep and hard. Ohhhhh yeaaaaaahhhhh.

  32. #67

    Keyboarding you are a retard. As a can hockey fan you should know better than most what you said means nothing in the nhl playoffs. God you sound so retarded. Read your post again.

    All these van backers are so ignorant. Why would la want carter- the guy never shows up in the playoffs. He helped get them in and now he can dissapear and it won't matter.

    Quick will stonewall the nucks.

  33. #68

    This and the capitals are the two most obvious upsets. Good luck.
    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 04/03/2014


  34. #69

  35. #70

    Quote Originally Posted by King Mayan View Post
    We are going to pound the canucks deep and hard. Ohhhhh yeaaaaaahhhhh.
    Did someone say Pound? I'm in. LA Kings for series. Let's cash LB!
    WHEEL
    OF
    BANISHMENT
    2/14/2014

First 12345 ... Last
Top