[spliff]

and should I stay away from a book rated "C" even if it is considered a WWTS white label brand?

thanks

[althelegend]

White label brand???

It's not alcoholic is it?

[spliff]

lol, no it's not. thanks though.

[Bill Dozer]

Hi Spliff.

WWTS white labels should be higher than C. Sometimes the domain owners will switch from a different turnkey op and there usually is an upgrade.

[Halifax]

Hi Spliff.

WWTS white labels should be higher than C. Sometimes the domain owners will switch from a different turnkey op and there usually is an upgrade.

Bill:

Is BetCorp standing behind the funds on deposit with their "white label" books, or is there a different level of credit risk playing with these guys (as compared to playing with WWTS, for example) ?

[Bill Dozer]

Bill:

Is BetCorp standing behind the funds on deposit with their "white label" books, or is there a different level of credit risk playing with these guys (as compared to playing with WWTS, for example) ?

Yes, but they are essentially WWTS with different homepages. You wouldn't be able to run through each bonus. The offers should also be lesser or identical. This is why they are listed in the rating guide this way. It's possible the site owners give up their players if they go deep in the red or don't want to market it anymore. In that case, player logs in at WWTS.

[Humdinger814]

My personal experience with C ratings has been a disaster.
ALLHORSERACING< HOLLYWOOD< RACEBOOK AND SPORTSBETTING are all operating under the WORLD GAMING software. I got stiffed by ALLHORSERACING: 50.00 daily double wagers with ALL in the FIRST race and MY SINGLE in the SECOND RACE.
Needless to say, I win the first, but my SINGLE GETS SCRATCHED and they SWALLOW everything except the one FIFTY that INCLUDED the WINNER of the FIRST RACE.
I found out the other three sites used the same strategy and cancelled those out today. NO MORE C RATINGS FOR ME