02-21-09, 02:48 PM
|
#1
|
|
somewhat restricted user
|
UCLA/Wash st.
+13 seems like a lot for a team that slows it down alot...
I like Wash St. first half alot here
anyone on Ucla?
|
|
|
02-21-09, 02:51 PM
|
#2
|
|
John wire me 2 dimes, thx pal
|
Archie,
UCLA avg. almost 20 ppg more offence but do allow 8 ppg more on the D side. But with that being said, UCLA can explode and easily have the 13 covered by half if not more. I wouldnt touch this game
__________________
All point debts paid in full finally!
|
|
|
02-21-09, 02:52 PM
|
#3
|
|
somewhat restricted user
|
they CAN explode.... but not many do against a Defense this good.....
so I think that would be more unlikely
|
|
|
02-21-09, 02:55 PM
|
#4
|
|
|
I'm liking that as well Chi.
__________________
R3's 2009-2010 Ticket Stats!
NCAA Football Ticket!
YTD: (10-7) (+4*)
NFL Ticket!
YTD: (20-12) (+3.5*)
|
|
|
02-21-09, 02:57 PM
|
#5
|
|
John wire me 2 dimes, thx pal
|
Archie, its not like Wast St defence is that great. 8 ppg avg difference is not much bro, if it was 18 I could see your case. A team 13-13 walking into UCLA as blow out written all over
__________________
All point debts paid in full finally!
|
|
|
02-21-09, 02:57 PM
|
#6
|
|
|
Scratch that, not playing it.
__________________
R3's 2009-2010 Ticket Stats!
NCAA Football Ticket!
YTD: (10-7) (+4*)
NFL Ticket!
YTD: (20-12) (+3.5*)
|
|
|
02-21-09, 02:57 PM
|
#7
|
|
somewhat restricted user
|
Wash St. might have lost by more then 10... a handful of times this year...they keep it close
they might not have been beaten by 14 this year except 1 or 2 times
|
|
|
02-21-09, 02:57 PM
|
#8
|
|
somewhat restricted user
|
Wash St. doesn't play good defense IWIN? have you watched them this year? be honest?
how did Ucla do last time against them?
|
|
|
02-21-09, 03:02 PM
|
#9
|
|
|
Can Wash st score is the question, they may limit UCLA possessions but they struggle on offense.
|
|
|
02-21-09, 03:04 PM
|
#10
|
|
John wire me 2 dimes, thx pal
|
Chi, I have watched Wash St play once this year and have seen UCLA play 2-3 times. Wash St lost by 2 at home to UCLA, ok. LIke Tully said, defence is all fun and stuff, but you have to score also. UCLA will win by double digits guarenteed, but to me this game is a no play
__________________
All point debts paid in full finally!
|
|
|
02-21-09, 03:10 PM
|
#11
|
|
somewhat restricted user
|
I've watched Wash st. alot, and I like their game, I like their coaching, and I like them in this game....
I'm a big Ben Howland fan too... but its hard not to like wash st +13.... they rarely allow opponents to get that far from them.... its not that teams might not be that much better...
but the way they play, you only have the amount of possessions of a 25 or 30 min game... so +13 is more like +17 or +18 translated into possessions
last game, UCLA shot lights out from three point land to win.... they weren't able to drive to the hoop or score down low very well
I'll take my chances with Ucla NOT shooting 60% from 3 point land again
|
|
|
02-21-09, 03:19 PM
|
#12
|
|
Official SBR Points Leader
|
I'm on UCLA. Making a play on every game today, but I agree that 13 does seem like a little too many
__________________
NCAA Football: 20-10-3 (+21.46 units)
NFL: 9-5-1 (+8.68 units)
2008: College Football: 36-12 (+24.3 units)
2008: College Basketball: 127-86 (+34.0 units)
2009 College Basketball: 80-50-1 (Up $4340)
|
|
|
02-21-09, 03:27 PM
|
#13
|
|
Bearcats
|
First half was a solid play.
|
|
|
02-21-09, 03:31 PM
|
#14
|
|
somewhat restricted user
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gummo
First half was a solid play.
|
scoring hasn't been a prob for wsu today... but their defense isn't what I expected...
still got to hold off UCLA from having a run still, lot of time left..
Ucla 2nd half might be an option here
|
|
|
02-21-09, 03:42 PM
|
#15
|
|
Bearcats
|
WSU is definitely racking up some fouls too. I don't see them hanging for long in the second half.
|
|
|
02-21-09, 03:45 PM
|
#16
|
|
somewhat restricted user
|
I just need them to hang on for 2 mins... and then decide if I like the halftime line to get a nice middle
ucla's free throws are keeping them in the game
|
|
|
02-21-09, 03:50 PM
|
#17
|
|
somewhat restricted user
|
ucla -8...
might take under 69, now way they keep shooting this good
|
|
|
02-21-09, 04:01 PM
|
#18
|
|
Rachel Ray is ... THE JOKER!
|
I think UCLA will absolutely kill them in the 2half. Could get ugly
__________________
TIP OF THE DAY:
~ durito is a spineless coward.
|
|
|
02-21-09, 04:29 PM
|
#19
|
|
somewhat restricted user
|
still a good game thus far....
|
|
|
02-21-09, 04:31 PM
|
#20
|
|
|
Ucla struggle to score
|
|
|
02-21-09, 04:32 PM
|
#21
|
|
somewhat restricted user
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tullamore
Ucla struggle to score
|
There's that defense that IWIN couldn't see
|
|
|
02-21-09, 04:33 PM
|
#22
|
|
|
UCLA is a joke if they can't beat Wash St at home
|
|
|
02-21-09, 04:34 PM
|
#23
|
|
Rachel Ray is ... THE JOKER!
|
Ooops. I was dead wrong on this one. My bad.
__________________
TIP OF THE DAY:
~ durito is a spineless coward.
|
|
|
02-21-09, 04:35 PM
|
#24
|
|
Rachel Ray is ... THE JOKER!
|
down by 7 with 350 to go
UCLA going to lose
__________________
TIP OF THE DAY:
~ durito is a spineless coward.
|
|
|
02-21-09, 04:39 PM
|
#25
|
|
John wire me 2 dimes, thx pal
|
Good call Archie! LIke I said it was a no play for me, but you were correct sir
__________________
All point debts paid in full finally!
|
|
|
02-21-09, 04:42 PM
|
#26
|
|
|
how do you miss that
|
|
|
02-21-09, 04:54 PM
|
#27
|
|
somewhat restricted user
|
dang, shoulda taken the ML too... I actually thought about it, after seeing WSU only lost by 2 last time
oh well, maybe my balls will be big enough another time
|
|
|
02-21-09, 04:55 PM
|
#28
|
|
|
These last 3 minutes have been great to watch
|
|
|
02-21-09, 05:00 PM
|
#29
|
|
|
what was the ML for WSU ? anybody got an idea ............
|
|
|
02-21-09, 05:00 PM
|
#30
|
|
Velez Sarsfield Under -200
|
I had UCLA -13 and I thought they would actually pull it off early in the 2nd half when they got up 5.. but then the WSU coach called a timeout and they started their winning run.
AMAZING game had me on the edge for the last 10 minutes, talk about some crazy scrambles and clutch FT shooting.
|
|
|
02-21-09, 05:04 PM
|
#31
|
|
|
UCLA, seems to play more up tempo, Howland said his players wanted to play this style, but I dont think they are better with the change in style. UCLA the last few years has always been about defense.
|
|
|
02-21-09, 05:05 PM
|
#32
|
|
somewhat restricted user
|
this style, is very different from howland's traditional style
Howland built Pitt, to who they are today
|
|
|
02-21-09, 05:05 PM
|
#33
|
|
|
WSU ML closed at +800 at 5Dimes
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by StraitShooter
90% of the guys dont give a shit about your problems..and the other 10 are glad you have them..
|
|
|
|
02-21-09, 05:08 PM
|
#34
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi_archie
this style, is very different from howland's traditional style
Howland built Pitt, to who they are today
|
Howland seems to have had success with that style, 3 straight final fours, I wonder if he changed for recruiting purposes?
|
|
|
02-21-09, 05:10 PM
|
#35
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RogueScholar
WSU ML closed at +800 at 5Dimes
|
wow massive doggie hit here ............ unreal
|
|
|
|
|