GL Razz- You are cheating going up to -120. It's easily obtainable at -120 but -110 or less is very tough.
| Poster's Sportsbook Poll: 2011View Poll Results | ||
| # 1 5Dimes | 450 total points | 5Dimes Review |
| # 2 Pinnacle | 408 total points | Pinnacle Review |
| # 3 Heritage | 227 total points | Heritage Review |
| # 4 Bookmaker | 138 total points | Bookmaker Review |
| # 5 BetIslands | 129 total points | BetIslands Review |
| SBR Top-Rated SportsbooksRecommended List | ||
| Pinnacle Sports | SBR Rating A+ | Pinnacle Sports Review |
| 5Dimes | SBR Rating A+ | 5Dimes Review |
| BookMaker | SBR Rating A+ | BookMaker Review |
| Legends | SBR Rating A+ | Legends Review |
| Bodog | SBR Rating A | Bodog Review |
GL Razz- You are cheating going up to -120. It's easily obtainable at -120 but -110 or less is very tough.
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005
yeah sure hes cheating...here are your nice little pills raiders. At least hes posting something interesting, something you didnt manage to do with your 400 posts lol.
Oh btw, i was thinking fav bets are losers anyway? Me thinks you dont know your own stuff too well haha...
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/23/2005
Although I guess I might be one of the ones making supposedly outlandish claims, I agree that is cheating, you need to hit 55% to break even at -120.
SBR POKER TOURNEY10th Place 5/24/2012
SBR POKER TOP 100
12th Place 11/1/2011
SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 4/30/2012
SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/23/2012
SBR POKER TOURNEY12th Place 5/25/2012
SBR Founder Join Date: 9/20/2005
Terris- You are really slow. It's much easier to hit a higher percentage at a line of -120 than -110.
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005
really? genius you are...but he will hit +120 too. Its just to have more options, so it wont take forever to play those 100 games.Originally Posted by raiders72001
Is that clear enough for you? lol...
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/23/2005
Terris- You should work on your reading comprehension. He's not going to play +120 games. If he played -110 or less it would be impressive. -120 is easy.
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005
yeah sure, everything someone else is doing is easy. Only what the great raiders tells us is sooo amazing and the whole truth. I think you must be the biggest ego on this board, good thing its only the net, and noone has to give a shit about you lol
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/23/2005
Terris- What if a guy played all -200 lines and hit 57%. Don't you see the difference in the claim at -110 compared to -200. I said that you cannot hit 57% using equal lines -110/+110 or -104/+104. Use a binomial distribution chart. It will show you how hard it is to win at a rate of 57% over 100 trials.
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005
If my math is correct, even if he played all 100 games @ -120, 55% yields a winner of 1 unit. The thread is called "Razz's 57 out of 100". He has built in a 2 game fudge factor just to make sure. I think the rules he has laid out are more than fair.
I didn't say it but its a given......good luck to you, Razz. We'll be rootin for you.
E
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005
Do you guys care if I split this thread?
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/9/2005
Feel free to delete all my stuff since I crapped up Razz's thread.
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005
Meaning what exactly?
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/22/2005
Raiders,
I guess this is what I'm trying to say:
100 games @ -110 @ 57% (assuming each game bet is one unit) yields 9.7 units.
100 games @ -120 @ 57% (assuming each game bet is one unit) yields 5.4 units.
My personal opinion is that: I think its tough either way. I'm certainly no pro but if I could hit 57% on a consistent basis in every sport I bet.......I would be a professional gambler and wouldn't have to be working for the man 8 to 5. $1K per unit....that would be pretty sweet.
Sorry, Razz. I guess I should have taken this message to another thread. I just want to state that I think 57% is tough in football no matter how you slice it.
E
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005
Split away, Illusion. I shouldn't have posted that last message in this thread.
E
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005
please illusion...sorry for all the useless posts, you could delete mine too.
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/23/2005
Alright, let's keep this going. This is an interesting topic.
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/9/2005
This is the whole point. Great post.My personal opinion is that: I think its tough either way. I'm certainly no pro but if I could hit 57% on a consistent basis in every sport I bet.......I would be a professional gambler and wouldn't have to be working for the man 8 to 5. $1K per unit....that would be pretty sweet.
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005
As EBone just showed you could make great money at 57%. If you play at reduced shops -104 and -105 you can make a fortune at 54%.
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005
Could not agree more with that post......in the olden days, every street bookie was @ -110 on sides and some had -120 on totals. Now, if you were winning during those days, the times now would yield you some serious jack........
E
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005
and baseball lines were 20 cents
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005
Are you satisfied with what I said about only playing 5 or so games that are more than -110, raiders? Honestly, I think everything more than balances out with the large amount of Even to -105 games I will be playing.
OK, I'm going to bed. Good luck with whoever everyone takes tomorrow, as long as its not the Red Sox.
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/22/2005
Razz- Good luck with your plays. Big Saturday and Sunday with foots and Bos/NYY baseball.
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005