View New Posts
  1. #1

    Default Tuesday Thumbs

    The purpose of this thread is to give tribute or scorn to things in the world of sports, betting or whatever. THUMBS UP or THUMBS DOWN .

    :thumbs_up to the Hall of Fame career of Steve Yzerman, one of the greatest and most respected players in the history of hockey. 6th on the all-time scoring list, this career Detroit Red Wing captained 3 Stanley Cup champions and was a member of the Canadian Olympic gold medal winning team in 2002. For all his personal accomplishments, he will always be known for his humility and is a Canadian treasure.

    :thumbs_do to Evander Holyfield for fighting again. I believe once you have started to lose your power of speech, it is time to stop boxing.

    :thumbs_do to the Hockey Hall of Fame for having the weakest standards of any HOF. Dick Duff was a good player and seems like a hell of a nice guy but this is a clear case of crony-ism. A bunch of old boys elected their buddy. Herb Brooks had his big moment but not a HOF career. He was inducted out of sentimentality. A couple years ago Clark Gillies was the good but ultimately undeserving player being enshrined. It happens too often. A Hall of Fame should not be about niceness; it should be about high standards.

    :thumbs_do to people second-guessing penalty kicks as a way to break ties in the World Cup without offering a better solution. I have a distaste for second-guessing in general and besides, I really enjoy the PK's.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 7/21/2005


  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mudcat
    :thumbs_do to people second-guessing penalty kicks as a way to break ties in the World Cup without offering a better solution. I have a distaste for second-guessing in general and besides, I really enjoy the PK's.
    What's wrong with sudden death until there's a winner.

    It's the World Cup: Once every Four Years.

    I say get rid of the PKs and let them play (not that I'm gonna watch .

  3. #3

    Default

    I agree with Paul, I think its unfair for some teams to lose in PK shootouts.
    This year I would have really enjoyed to see Argentina advance...

  4. #4

    Default

    I think they should let them keep playing but at the end of the first overtime, they should hand out swords.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 12/16/2005


  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by isetcap
    I think they should let them keep playing but at the end of the first overtime, they should hand out swords.
    One of the most brilliant suggestions I've read in a long time.

  6. #6

    Default

    THUMBS DOWN to ryan zimmerman

    this guy just killed me by hitting a 3 run walk-off shot in the bottom of the 9th with 2 outs to lead the nats to a win today

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  7. #7

    Default

    THUMBS UP to Tampa Bay and Oakland

    THUMBS DOWN to Germany
    200pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/18/2012

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/25/2005


  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paul2650
    What's wrong with sudden death until there's a winner.
    Well at least you have a suggestion.

    The problem with that is it leaves the potential for 5, 10, 20+ hour games. Apart from the issues for fans, it would leave a team involved in such a marathon at a (possibly very big) disadvantage for future games.

    I assume that's the reason they don't do that. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong.

    But what I came here to say was

    to Annika Sorenstam for winning the U.S. Women's Open by taking an 18 hole playoff against Pat Hurst on Monday. She's good.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 7/21/2005


  9. #9
    Ganchrow's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-28-05
    Posts: 5,014
    SBR Points: 119
    Message Me

    Default

    It's been suggested that in the case of a tie after the initial extra time both teams remove a player for a sudden death match up. This is then repeated every few minutes until a winner is determined.

    I kind of like that.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/28/2005


  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paul2650
    What's wrong with sudden death until there's a winner.

    It's the World Cup: Once every Four Years.

    I say get rid of the PKs and let them play (not that I'm gonna watch .
    I agree. This supposed to be the biggest sporting event in the world and if it take 10 hours to finish a game I say so be it.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/9/2005


  11. #11

    Default

    They'll be so tired after a coupla extra hours that one team is bound to score.

  12. #12

    Default

    I enjoy the PK's as well Mud. I think I could honestly score on one. I think it is embarassing when they run up to it and tap it like they are shaving points.

    But if you don't like PK's just win the damn match like Italy did today.

  13. #13

    Default

    Aren't there 20+ hour matches in the overwhelmingly exciting sport of cricket? Between football and cricket, I suspect the British version of ESPN would have a tedium that could be equated to a day spent in solitary confinement at a maximum security prison.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 12/16/2005


Top