[pico]

ucla is no oregon st.

[I.R.B]

There is no reason why Usc should lose this game.. USC Lock? lol

[I.R.B]

On the other hand i will never look at another Usc M/L for the rest of my life..

[I.R.B]

Unless i could get them as a dog.

[pico]

There is no reason why Usc should lose this game.. USC Lock? lol

sure why not. this is one of those times i think usc can win with 3rd string players.

[LT Profits]

Yes but what's the point of laying $45 to win $1. On the 2% chance that USC loses, your bankroll will be ruined. It is not worth the risk.

[Doc JS]

Yes but what's the point of laying $45 to win $1. On the 2% chance that USC loses, your bankroll will be ruined. It is not worth the risk.

With you 100% LT...

Doc

[I.R.B]

Surely not worth the risk.. But this seems a bit Lockish..

[LT Profits]

Surely not worth the risk.. But this seems a bit Lockish..

Understood, but why tie up so much money for a small reward when the money can be better used elsewhere? That is, unless you have very deep pockets where you don't care about betting a 45/1 favorite that may actually be +EV (I think USC wins 98% of the time, making fair ML 49/1).