View New Posts
  1. #1

    Default Is this guy a Hall of Famer?

    Without revealing the name just yet, I am going to give you some numbers of a player not in the Hall, and you guys tell me if he deserves to be there.
    330 plus homers
    Almost 1500 RBI
    .290 lifetime average
    2 batting titles
    1 MVP Award
    .345 in a World Series
    3 Silver Slugger Awards
    3 Gold Gloves
    Possessed one of the top two throwing arms in the game while he was playing
    88 plus RBI seasons
    20 plus homers 9 times
    150 plus career stolen bases

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  2. #2

    Default

    Those are similar numbers to Jim Rice who isn't in the Hall. Of course that leads to the question of, should Rice be there? A lot of people think he should.

    I'm not clear on this line: 88 plus RBI seasons

    In any case, based on that info I think my vote would be no. The numbers are very good but I'm not blown away.

    Different HOF's set different standards and I kind of like how baseball is very tough (unlike hockey).

    I would call that a great career and leave it at that.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 7/21/2005


  3. #3

    Default

    hmm numbers don't look a whole lot better than a guy like cecil cooper , or harold baines so i gotta say no, got to think andre dawson is in front of this guy
    Last edited by scottyy11; 06-11-06 at 12:43 PM.

  4. #4

    Default

    it's not dawson or rice.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  5. #5

    Default

    the dave parker or dwight evans? its amazing how many guys are just on the edge of the hof

  6. #6

    Default

    your right it's dave parker.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  7. #7

    Default

    Somewhere along the line, the topic changed from are these numbers good enough for the HOF? to guess the player.

    Nice call scotty.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 7/21/2005


  8. #8

    Default

    This is why I hate looking just at numbers. Guys like Parker, Rice, Dawson and I'll throw one more name at you from a while back, Vada Pinson, are borderline players. For my money, they were all right there as far as being in the top 10% of their contemporaries that is my loose cutoff/criteria.

    I would rank Parker behind Rice, behind Pinson, behind Dawson as far as that quartet that is not in the HOF.

  9. #9

    Default

    That career summary describes Larry Walker, but he isn't a HOFer.

    BAUS

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  10. #10

    Default

    Walker and Parker are two perfect comparisons from slightly different eras.

    Another name to throw out there that should generate controversy is Albert Belle. That guy posted 10-yrs worth of really great numbers - better than Rice, Dawson, Pinson, Parker and Walker. He came off as an ass, putting it mildly. But he was a monster with a bat for a decade.

  11. #11

    Default

    Walker was a legitimate 5 tool player. Belle was not. But he did put up some numbers.

    BAUS

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


Top