[mathdotcom]

25% back? This can't be for real, even if jj is backing them

[jjgold]

It is real, 25% back on loses

I not going to plug a book unless they are very solid

[mathdotcom]

Their marketing strategy should be 25% on all winnings. They'd have to pay out less, and get more business since everyone thinks they are picking winners.

[Tsoprano]

Are they post-up or credit?

[RiverRaid]

Originally Posted by Tsoprano

Are they post-up or credit?

You seem like a cool guy so I'm not tying to be an ass, but you average 30 post a day and you are not sure if rebatewager.com is a post up or credit shop? Just sounds very strange to me.

[I.R.B]

Originally Posted by RiverRaid

You seem like a cool guy so I'm not tying to be an ass, but you average 30 post a day and you are not sure if rebatewager.com is a post up or credit shop? Just sounds very strange to me.

I did not know about this untill about a week ago. When you are having no problems with the few books you play at there is no reason to look for others..

[RiverRaid]

Originally Posted by I.R.B

I did not know about this untill about a week ago. When you are having no problems with the few books you play at there is no reason to look for others..

Fair enough i guess, but as much as you guys read this forum(according to your post count) i would have thought you would have picked this up.

Rebatewagering=postup, Blackdog=credit just from what i have read.

[pico]

25% is your net loss. most cases, you'll end up lose the rebate as well. if you go there because you want rebates, then you should probably quit gambling.

[Richkas]

Originally Posted by pico

25% is your net loss. most cases, you'll end up lose the rebate as well. if you go there because you want rebates, then you should probably quit gambling.

well said

[SSLP]

The rebates are a great marketing strategy to get people hooked .

Rebatewager.com and Blackdogeg.com SOLID books. Must have out not one single complaint about them EVER.

[teaserpleaser]

The free 5x 50 NFL wagers is cool ... I hit all 5 and am over my the 2x rollover see how the payout works. I like these guys customer service is A+ so far.

[pokernut9999]

Originally Posted by Richkas

well said

What is wrong with getting a rebate if you lose ? Not the only reason to play there. Their customer service is great and they pay a lot faster than your guys Richie

[mathdotcom]

Doesn't accept moneybookers.

[pokernut9999]

Originally Posted by mathdotcom

Doesn't accept moneybookers.

Get their debit card.

[Tsoprano]

Originally Posted by RiverRaid

You seem like a cool guy so I'm not tying to be an ass, but you average 30 post a day and you are not sure if rebatewager.com is a post up or credit shop? Just sounds very strange to me.

This is the first time I actually participated in a rebatewwager conversation. I hear their name in JJgold videos here and there, but nothing in depth.

[CaneDawg]

Lots of positive posts for these guys.

Rebates are bascially the same as reload bonus's.

Just a different way to spin it

[Richkas]

Like Pico said. If rebates sound good to you, then you probably should quit gambling.

[jjgold]

95% of players lose so why not get rebates back on loses??

It is a no brainer, we all want to win but it aint happening

I am not getting any rebates there because I am hammering them good!!

I love gambling

[pokernut9999]

Originally Posted by CaneDawg

Lots of positive posts for these guys.

Rebates are bascially the same as reload bonus's.

Just a different way to spin it

Not really the same , if you lose you can cash out the rebate.

No strings attached or rollovers.

[pokernut9999]

Originally Posted by Richkas

Like Pico said. If rebates sound good to you, then you probably should quit gambling.

Just like you to ignore the great customer service and fast payouts.

[CaneDawg]

Originally Posted by pokernut9999

Not really the same , if you lose you can cash out the rebate.

No strings attached or rollovers.

True...

There are some books that have reloads etc,,, without any strings

[pavyracer]

If jjgold (mathdotcom is his ghost) is endorsing them they are garbage. I would play first at creditwagering before I play at rebatewagering. At least with creditwagering you can proudly display your picture on the stiff list.

[Tsoprano]

There's nothing wrong with taxing the book an extra 25% for losses, everybody loses at some point...why not cash out a bit from it.

[mathdotcom]

I started this thread asking if they were legit, then gave them a thumbs down for no moneybookers, but apparently I am a jj ghost touting them?

[pico]

Originally Posted by Tsoprano

There's nothing wrong with taxing the book an extra 25% for losses, everybody loses at some point...why not cash out a bit from it.

net losses are calculated for the season. there are only 2-3 seasons per year. so if you're getting rebates, that means you got barreled in for the season.

[pokernut9999]

Originally Posted by pico

net losses are calculated for the season. there are only 2-3 seasons per year. so if you're getting rebates, that means you got barreled in for the season.

That is their loyalty bonus not the rebate part.