[Illusion]

SBR Bill Dozer reports: Aebet (SBR rating D+) player submits latest canceled-winning wager complaint. The sportsbook claims that the event’s odds were set incorrectly, therefore the winnings will not be honored. However, the player has cited similar odds from other sportsbooks on the same event. The canceling of winning wagers due to a "bad line" after the match has unfortunately become an increasingly common complaint. Doing this gives the sportsbook the ability to cheat players. They may offer a questionable line while waiting to see the outcome of the game before deciding if the wager will be valid.

[Mudcat]

I know that mistakes can happen but you JUST CANNOT go cancelling winning wagers after the result is in.

[FreddeSwe]

SBR Bill Dozer reports: Aebet (SBR rating D+) player submits latest canceled-winning wager complaint. The sportsbook claims that the event’s odds were set incorrectly, therefore the winnings will not be honored. However, the player has cited similar odds from other sportsbooks on the same event. The canceling of winning wagers due to a "bad line" after the match has unfortunately become an increasingly common complaint. Doing this gives the sportsbook the ability to cheat players. They may offer a questionable line while waiting to see the outcome of the game before deciding if the wager will be valid.

Why do they have such good rating if they void bets without a good reason?

[jjgold]

That bad line rule is very frustrating and hard to determine

Your at books mercy