[SlickFazzer]

betting football and basketball spreads at -110..

Kind of like a RAZZ of sports betting.

below 40%?

[VegasDave]

I'd guess no worse than 47%...

If you could hit under 40% winners, that means all you'd have to do is fade yourself and you'd be at over 60% winners. Not going to happen.

[SlickFazzer]

Good argument USC.

[fiveteamer]

I would be surprised if I could break 40%.

[SlickFazzer]

Its interesting:

Going 6-4 (60%) forever is impossible.

Yet going worse than 4-6 (40%) forever may be impossible is well.

Its a fine line sports bettors try to walk.

[VegasDave]

Originally Posted by SlickFazzer

Good argument USC.

Just the truth. Think about it. Isn't this game of razz exactly what we are all playing?

Don't we cap games in an attempt to find CERTAIN losers, and bet against them? The only difference in your game is you'd bet FOR those teams you were confident would lose, not against them.

Even the best of us only cap around 55% - 58% winners -110/-110. As such, those same people could pull off a 45% - 42%.

But the other 99% that can't cap over 53%? They would be stuck in the 47% - 53% range no matter how hard they tried to win or lose.

[fiveteamer]

OK, maybe 44%

[yisman]

well, I'd just fade my picks, so I could do 35% or so.

[dochock77]

ill tell you after tomorrow.

[ryanXL977]

you cant fade yourself bc you will end up reverse fading your fade and then reversing that

most of you guys would do better to fade vendittos