?????????????
Thanks
| Poster's Sportsbook Poll: 2011View Poll Results | ||
| # 1 5Dimes | 450 total points | 5Dimes Review |
| # 2 Pinnacle | 408 total points | Pinnacle Review |
| # 3 Heritage | 227 total points | Heritage Review |
| # 4 Bookmaker | 138 total points | Bookmaker Review |
| # 5 BetIslands | 129 total points | BetIslands Review |
| SBR Top-Rated SportsbooksRecommended List | ||
| Pinnacle Sports | SBR Rating A+ | Pinnacle Sports Review |
| 5Dimes | SBR Rating A+ | 5Dimes Review |
| BookMaker | SBR Rating A+ | BookMaker Review |
| Legends | SBR Rating A+ | Legends Review |
| Bodog | SBR Rating A | Bodog Review |
Absolutely none.......same as always
Substantially reducing my offshore exposure
Plan on depositing more into offshore sportsbooks
Shutting it down completely
?????????????
Thanks
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/11/2005
This is going to be some interesting times.
TOP SPORTSBOOK
WINNER
5/23/2012
3-QUESTION
SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/17/2012
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/11/2005
SBR POKER TOP 100
45th Place 11/1/2011
WSOP
SATELLITE
WINNER
1st Place
none
Offshore sportsbooks are much slower and most of the big ones have no usa ties as far as banking and ownership
SBR Founder Join Date: 7/20/2005
SBR Founder Join Date: 7/20/2005
I cashed out everything from 5 different offshore books. I'm going back to booking bets... Fukk the FBI and fukk all this bullshit
SBR POKER TOURNEY14th Place 5/25/2012
SBR POKER TOURNEY4th Place 5/23/2012
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/11/2005
SBR POKER TOP 100
45th Place 11/1/2011
WSOP
SATELLITE
WINNER
1st Place
No way to know at this point, Fish...
It completely depends on how far down the rabbit hole this goes.
Doc
TOP
CASINO
WINNER
5/24/2012
SBR POKER TOP 100
50th Place 11/1/2011
SBR POKER TOURNEY14th Place 5/25/2012
SBR POKER TOURNEY4th Place 5/23/2012
The only short term problem I see books having is with payment processors getting shut down. That should regulate itself within time however. If DOJ vs. Big 3 doesn't get plead out and goes to trial I foresee lots of precedents being made. This could trod path for future DOJ involved in other areas of online gambling I.e. sportsbooks, casinos etc. It will be interesting to see how this plays out long term.
BTP
3rd PLACE 37-20-3 $1,000
SBR WORLD
POKER CUP
1st Place
2012
SBR POKER TOP 100
92nd Place 11/1/2011
SBR Founder Join Date: 8/11/2005
I have some inside knowledge being friendly with a few of the larger rakeback providers, I'll write up something later tonight. I think the discussions here are a little better than the ones going on right now at 2+2 where every half hour its just a new wave of people discussing the same introductory shit.
SBR POKER TOP 100
45th Place 11/1/2011
WSOP
SATELLITE
WINNER
1st Place
SBR POKER TOP 100
45th Place 11/1/2011
WSOP
SATELLITE
WINNER
1st Place
After talking to different folks in poker and in gaming in general this kind of feels like Neteller 2007. You have the big-name guys flying to the US landing in the fed's backyard and you have more do-it-yourself-bankers. Neteller was essentially a bank and it looks like the poker guys literally owned at least one.
Sports betting is different business from poker. The sportsbooks already have kind of been through this. Poker money needs to constantly move in and out and the volume is high. Being able to play depends on others playing. People don't want to play cash games all day, win, and leave it there until the next time unless they are poker pros. Sports betting processing has been frozen before. It's happened to most books. A few years ago we saw Sportsbook.com take 6 months and good books took 2 or 3 at different points in time. They were books that are more than financially sound, not the WSEXs who use it as an excuse. Regardless if you think the way the law was slipped in an unrelated bill should be illegal and it was created by selfish politicians, it is a law and is illegal for US banks to move money for gaming which is a liability for bookmakers. In the past few years a lot of books are diversifying their player base so they have more stability as a business. Canada, Japan, UK and South America make up much bigger parts of their customer bases.
Seizing domains is something new to consider. I think a year or so ago a bill was passed, sold on the most flagrant online offense of all, child porn. Advocates for civil liberties and internet freedom were scared since the language didn't limit the reach to only certain types of federal offenses. We first saw the streaming sports domains confiscated (and come back up) and then wikileaks and now online poker. If this was happening years ago we wouldn't have seen the Napsters and then itunes and so on. For those assessing risk it's definitely something to consider. Just like we saw a lot of the lesser books, like the old Skybook, break or sell because of the stress of processing on their business, could your sportsbook handle the losses when going from Bodog.com to Bodoglife.com or ccTLDs... or no domain name service and just a web IP address?
SBR Founder Join Date: 7/12/2005
It seems like the DOJ happens to have a hard on for the sites that "rub it in their face" by advertising and promoting in the states. These poker sites were all over the TV. Betonsports was another one that was advertising all over the place, even setting up outside NFL stadiums the day of the game.
TOP SPORTSBOOK
WINNER
5/9/2012
good to hear dozer chiming in. maybe it will calm the masses
iPad
WINNER
SBR Store
08/4/2011
I don't think this will effect the sportsbook industry very much. In fact, I think some sites may gain from this. The indictments won't stop people from wanting to play poker, so instead of gambling with Stars or Tilt they'll just put money onto sites like Bodog.
I got screwed over by the Neteller fiasco about as bad as anybody, and I'm quite glad I don't have any money on the indicted sites currently, but I just don't see this having the the same repercussions as the UIGEA/Neteller period. I think the only reason Stars and Tilt have abandoned the American market is because they've been trying to become regulated in the US and don't want to make additional waves. Absolute and UB got the same treatment from the DoJ and they haven't withdrawn. Not surprisingly, they haven't made any attempt to become regulated by the US government.
SBR POKER TOP 100
49th Place 11/1/2011
These poker sites were still advertising on US soil. All the .nets were a spit in the face and seen as no different than advertising the company in general. Full Tilt was advertising with Strikeforce. Wynn had a deal with Poker Stars for when poker went legal in the US, which is happeneing. Absolute and its scandal was a black eye for online poker in general and could enter the US market. What message would it send if Poker Stars, Full Tilt and Absolute had key positions in the US and huge market share as a result of skirting the law for years? They couldn't let it happen.
|
This post was nominated 2
times
. To view the nominated thread please click here.
People who nominated: nosniboR11, and Extra Innings
|
SBR Founder Join Date: 7/12/2005
Great poll fishead.
This pool should be stickied on every subforum of SBR so we can gauge the affect this will have
iPad
WINNER
SBR Store
06/10/2011