View New Posts
  1. #1

    Default So about this Ron Artest suspension . . .

    Did you see the footage? Did that little shot really warrant a 1 game suspension or was that all based on reputation?

    Maybe it's because I'm from hockey country but to me, that was nothing.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 7/21/2005


  2. #2

    Default

    The NBA shouldn't have suspended him i didn't think.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  3. #3

  4. #4

    Default

    Manu should get punked in the chops about 10 times a game anyway.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 12/16/2005


  5. #5

    Default

    There's no reason he should have been suspended.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/9/2005


  6. #6

    Default

    It wasn't even called a flagrant foul. I don't think anyone else who did that would get suspended. It's all because of Artest's reputation.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 7/21/2005


  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mudcat
    It wasn't even called a flagrant foul. I don't think anyone else who did that would get suspended. It's all because of Artest's reputation.
    And because Manu is a goldenboy flopper.

    SBR Founder Join Date: 12/16/2005


  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by isetcap
    And because Manu is a goldenboy flopper.
    Yes, this generation's version of Vlade.
    200pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/18/2012

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/25/2005


Top