View New Posts
123
  1. #1

  2. #2

  3. #3

    Default

    Raiders -17. We've been down this road before, the best college team can't compete with the worst NFL team.

  4. #4

  5. #5

    Default

    Try Oakland -41.5

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  6. #6

  7. #7

    Default

    Actually, it all depends on how motivated the Raiders were to win big. Any NFL team would be able to do whatever the hell they wanted against any college team. The line play would be a joke.

  8. #8

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BuddyBear View Post
    Try Oakland -41.5

    I'm with that. I would say upwards of -28.

  10. #10

    Default

    Buddy Bear,

    I was trying to get balanced action!

  11. #11

    Default

    Are you guys stupid? -3?, -14.5?, -17?

    Do you not realize the players on USC are amateurs and the ones on Oakland are professionals? Do you not realize that the players on USC are still on their parents' health insurance? USC lost to Stanford last year (at home no less) and you expect them to somehow be competitive against an NFL team? There probably wouldn't be a drive where Oakland does not score against USC.

    You guys crack me up....

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    Buddy Bear,

    I was trying to get balanced action!
    hmmm......i think you'd get a lot of one way action on USC with a -17 line

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  13. #13

  14. #14

    Default

    Raiders would score every drive. SC would struggle to move the ball into Oakland territory once.

    USC wouldn't even beat Oklahoma, let alone be competitive against the Raiders. Seems every year people have an inflated opinion of the Trojans.
    400pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/17/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/24/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/28/2012

    50pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY14th Place 5/23/2012

    275pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY3rd Place 5/28/2012

    50pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY14th Place 5/25/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/17/2012

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Store 05/05/2012

    200pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/22/2012


  15. #15

    Default

    I don't disagree with you at all BB, but there are many suckers out there that would take USC +20ish. Hence my lbalanced action quip.

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    there are many suckers out there that would take USC +20ish.
    Seems there are a few in this thread.
    400pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/17/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/24/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/28/2012

    50pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY14th Place 5/23/2012

    275pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY3rd Place 5/28/2012

    50pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY14th Place 5/25/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/17/2012

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Store 05/05/2012

    200pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/22/2012


  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rjt721 View Post
    Seems there are a few in this thread.
    lol I think it would be -17, how comes you're always right?

  18. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by englishmike View Post
    lol I think it would be -17, how comes you're always right?
    I'm rarely right. Almost never, actually.
    400pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/17/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/24/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/28/2012

    50pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY14th Place 5/23/2012

    275pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY3rd Place 5/28/2012

    50pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY14th Place 5/25/2012

    175 pts

    3-QUESTION
    SBR TRIVIA WINNER 05/17/2012

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Store 05/05/2012

    200pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY5th Place 5/22/2012


  19. #19

    Default

    Raiders can barely score.
    400pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY1st Place 5/15/2012

    65pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY12th Place 5/23/2012

    275pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY3rd Place 5/16/2012

    40pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY16th Place 5/28/2012

    325pts

    SBR POKER TOURNEY2nd Place 5/25/2012


  20. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rjt721 View Post
    I'm rarely right. Almost never, actually.
    Join the club.

  21. #21

    Default

    If Oak and USC played, i doubt OAK would ever have to run a 3rd down offensive play....

    SBR Founder Join Date: 8/10/2005


  22. #22

    Default

    Trojans would beat the Raiders!!!!!!!!!!

    SC currently has 5-10 future 1st rd picks that can play in the NFL right now. Many of the Raiders are only 1-2 year removed from college like Russell and McFadden.

    Not to mention SC has far superior coaching staff.

    Didn't u guys watch a rookie WR punk the Raiders on MNF????????

    Trojans 42 - Raiders 28

  23. #23

  24. #24

    Default

    BB you are overreacting, where do Pros come from? How long is Russell playing in the NFL now? Why does Oakland suck if they are all so good compared to the USC kids?

    Impossible to set a line and to cap how motivated OAK would be...but i would be all over USC +35..could count on 1 thing: USC would play with a big heart.

  25. #25

  26. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gordon gekko View Post
    What about USC vs. Cowboys?
    lol dunno, maybe -56?

  27. #27

    Default

    Oak at least -25

    SBR Founder Join Date: 7/20/2005


  28. #28

    Default

    Yea the difference is that a man does not reach his prime until he is mid 20's. A couple to 5 years after entering the NFL.

    The offensive and defensive lines of the NFL team would just completely obliterate the college team.

    The Raiders like every NFL team are pretty much national college all star teams except in their athletic primes while the college kids are still kids. Its not even worth talking about, really.

    Raiders could win by 70 points against USC if they wanted.

  29. #29
    durito's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 07-03-06
    Posts: 13,083
    SBR Points: 1078
    Message Me

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BuddyBear View Post
    Try Oakland -41.5

    I'd still take Oakland.


    My first thought was 70.


    I'd bet my entire bankroll at -17

  30. #30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BuddyBear View Post
    Are you guys stupid? -3?, -14.5?, -17?

    Do you not realize the players on USC are amateurs and the ones on Oakland are professionals?
    People can't recognize this kind of difference easily.

    The game wouldn't even be remotely close. USC-Raiders would be like a forum poster going up against a front page tout in a capping contest. It would get real ugly real fast.

  31. #31

    Default

    USC +53 vs Cowboys, USC +44.5 vs Raiders, USC -74 vs SBR Posters football team

    iPad
    WINNER
    SBR Store 06/10/2011


  32. #32

    Default

    Mike Corbin +50000 Floyd Mayweather -50000

    @ Mandalay bay for the welterweight championship

  33. #33

  34. #34

    Default

    Wow this is getting more retarded.

    Check the Raiders roster.... it's full of college underclassmen, journeymen and other undesirables. Now check the USC roster.... full of All-Americans and future #1 draft picks.

    If u were given a chance to replace 10 Raiders with 10 Trojans you would do it in a heartbeat and it would improve the Raiders immediately into a playoff team.

  35. #35

    Default

    Cowboys would beat USC by 21....... Raiders by 42.

1234 ... Last
Top