|
02-06-2006, 06:21 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: 08-10-05
Posts: 47,163
|
Nfl Pro Bowl
I don't usualy bet this game at all, but i'm kind of liking the under 67 in this game.
__________________
Checkout MySBR page.
|
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 07:02 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
SBR MVP
Join Date: 09-15-05
Posts: 1,168
|
do they have a rule where you can't sack the qb like the gay college senior bowl or something? this number seams really high for nfl even with the top in the league in the game...
|
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 07:05 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: 08-10-05
Posts: 47,163
|
yes, they have that rule LVH. i feel it will still go under that total though.
__________________
Checkout MySBR page.
|
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 07:14 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
SBR
Join Date: 11-16-05
Location:
Posts: 18,143
|
you cant sack the QB? I never noticed?
|
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 07:27 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: 08-10-05
Posts: 47,163
|
img, maybe smoking weed doesn't help you as much as you think then 
__________________
Checkout MySBR page.
|
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 07:44 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
SBR
Join Date: 11-16-05
Location:
Posts: 18,143
|
I never really watched the game all that closely. Its the most meaningless
game out of all the all-star themed games. I never noticed that you
can't sack QB, what do they do? Cause I know
Offensive lineman are there? For What??
|
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 07:46 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: 08-10-05
Posts: 47,163
|
they just rush the QB img. sacks are not allowed in this exhibition game
__________________
Checkout MySBR page.
|
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 09:37 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
SBR MVP
Join Date: 09-20-05
Posts: 3,923
|
No blitzes, they can sack him
I guess I will have to study the rosters first but I am surprised the NFC is favored without looking, last year the AFC -3.5 was a real strong play for me, it actually ended similiar to the SuperBowl with an 11 point victory, although no dramatic last second drive
|
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 09:41 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
SBR Posting Legend
Join Date: 08-10-05
Location: Area 51
Posts: 19,662
|
I will not be betting on this game, or show should I say.
|
|
|
|
02-07-2006, 12:36 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
SBR MVP
Join Date: 10-06-05
Location: Midwest, USA. Go Packers, Colts.
Posts: 3,007
|
I wish they'd play this game during training camp or something. It's such a letdown after the Super Bowl. I never watch it.
|
|
|
|
02-07-2006, 03:10 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: 08-09-05
Posts: 23,489
|
I never watch this, but if I had to bet it would be the under.
__________________
|
|
|
|
02-07-2006, 09:19 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
SBR MVP
Join Date: 09-15-05
Posts: 1,168
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rm18
No blitzes, they can sack him
|
How would you sack if you don't blitz? Just the d line can sack him? now I'm getting interested in this strictly for betting's sake  ... anyone know where you can find historic scores from the probowl?
|
|
|
|
02-07-2006, 09:23 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
SBR MVP
Join Date: 09-15-05
Posts: 1,168
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Illusion
I never watch this, but if I had to bet it would be the under.
|
What do you "had to bet" Illusion? Surely you don't mean to suggest that we aren't required to bet if there is only one game to bet on?
|
|
|
|
02-07-2006, 01:15 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
SBR MVP
Join Date: 10-06-05
Location: Midwest, USA. Go Packers, Colts.
Posts: 3,007
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LVHerbie
What do you "had to bet" Illusion? Surely you don't mean to suggest that we aren't required to bet if there is only one game to bet on?
|
Illusion might be talking about a free bet sometimes offered by sportsbooks or whatever. For example, I've got a free $50 bet on the Kentucky Derby as part of a signup bonus at a particular book. I know zero about horses, but here is a situation where I've got to bet on them, so to speak. I saw another free bet option on the coinflip for the Super Bowl on the VIP site. If you look hard enough, there's maybe a free bet opportunity somewhere on the internet on the Pro Bowl.
|
|
|
|
02-07-2006, 10:59 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
SBR MVP
Join Date: 09-20-05
Posts: 3,923
|
The D-line can rush, and the AFC is favored by 4 not the NFC
|
|
|
|
02-08-2006, 12:17 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
SBR MVP
Join Date: 09-15-05
Posts: 1,168
|
needless to say it's hard to find much on the probowl as far as scouting goes but I finally found some historical scores by googling... anyhow, I did this all by hand so if anyone is as bored as me and wants to check this fill free...
2005 - AFC - 38-27 - Total 65
2004 - NFC - 55-52 - 107
2003 - AFC - 45-20 - 65
2002 - AFC - 38-30 - 68
2001 - AFC - 38-17 - 55
2000 - NFC - 51-31 - 82
1999 - AFC - 23-10 - 43
1998 - AFC - 41-13 - 54
1997 - AFC - 26-23 OT - 49
1996 - NFC - 20-13 - 33
AFC - 7 / NFC - 3
average points (last 10 years) - 62.1
average points (last 5 year) - 72
average points (last 3 year) - 79
aganist current over/under 68 // 2 overs / 7 unders / 1 tie
pinnacle -4 -104 / +4 -104 // ML +168 -178 // o67 -124 / u67 +114
check out all other sites listed on on the sbrline and listed what I found that was better then pinnacle
bowman total 69.5 /o -110 /u -110
matchbook -4 -103 / +4 -105 // ML +164 -176 // o68 -105 / u68 -103
others
nine total 68 / o -105 / u -105
1H
betcris +3 -125 / -3 +105 // o34 -110 / u34 -110
nine +1.5 -102 / -1.5 -118 // o34.5 -110 / u34.5 -110
Last edited by LVHerbie : 02-08-2006 at 12:37 AM.
|
|
|
|
02-08-2006, 12:31 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
SBR MVP
Join Date: 09-15-05
Posts: 1,168
|
my bets - NFC +168 (.1 unit) risk & u67 +114 (.1 unit)
anaysis - This is the probowl and, quite frankly, nobody cares... so, IMHO, all the above doesn't mean shit... thus I'm taking both the +juice bets just so if I hit one (or both) I will have a slight (real slight) reason to care... 
Last edited by LVHerbie : 02-10-2006 at 07:09 PM.
|
|
|
|
|