SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks Recommended Books
1. Pinnacle Sports SBR Rating A+ Pinnacle Sports Review
2. The Greek Sports Book SBR Rating A+ The Greek Review
3. BookMaker SBR Rating A+ BookMaker Review
4. BetJamaica SBR Rating A+ BetJamaica Review
5. Legends Sports SBR Rating A+ Legends Review
 
SBR Posters' Poll - September 2009 View Complete Results
1. 5Dimes 253 total points 5Dimes Review
2. Matchbook 252 total points Matchbook Review
3. BetJamaica 194 total points BetJamaica Review
4. Pinnacle Sports 193 total points Pinnacle Sports Review
5. BookMaker 190 total points BookMaker Review
 
View Poll Results: CHICAGO vs MINNESOTA
CHICAGO 14 31.82%
MINNESOTA (Home) -10.5 24 54.55%
Over 43.5 17 38.64%
Under 8 18.18%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll
 
View New Posts
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-17-07, 04:13 AM   #1
hello
 
hello's Avatar
Default Monday December 17, 2007 CHICAGO vs MINNESOTA

MINNESOTA (Home)-10.5
OVER 43.5
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 04:40 AM   #2
Illusion
 
Illusion's Avatar
Joined: 08-09-05
Posts: 22,624
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

I am leaning heavily towards the Vikings in this one.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 07:23 AM   #3
EGGY6199
 
EGGY6199's Avatar
Joined: 09-05-07
Posts: 530
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

WOW I am going to bet the Bears here. The Vikings are not that good.

4-1 on the ML is a real price
The Viks play in a dome don't they so the weather won't be a factor.... and the bears play real well away.

Bears 4-1 1 units
Bears +10.5 5 units
Over 5 units
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 08:35 AM   #4
jtnguyen79
 
jtnguyen79's Avatar
Joined: 09-26-07
Posts: 730
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

all i know is vikings are much better than the sorry bears......worst mistake was getting rid of Thomas Jones for fumbling cedric benson


go Vikings!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a sorry team that made superbowl last year........huge disappointment

away record for Bears 3-4 that makes them play well?? 3-4 ATS away too while Minnesota is 4-2 at home and 4-2 ATS......I mean spread is a little high this week but come on chicago has given up already....this game will be similar to what Tampa Bay did to Atlanta on sunday.

good luck everyone
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 09:26 AM   #5
patsfan2727
 
patsfan2727's Avatar
Joined: 10-28-07
Posts: 556
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default uhhh?

bigboydan voted for all 4 options.
HE'S A GUARANTEED WINNER!
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 10:21 AM   #6
HAPPY BOY
 
HAPPY BOY's Avatar
Joined: 08-10-05
Posts: 4,734
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

Im never seen an NFL year with so many double digit lines. fvcking Nfl is turning into the ncaa with these spreads. Sad part is Im scared to take the points.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 11:17 AM   #7
buztah
 
buztah's Avatar
Joined: 03-23-07
Posts: 6,541
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

Happyboy, I hear ya. I just can't lay 10 1/2 and I can't trust ther bears with a 10 1/2 lead either. Pass.
__________________
True Lion Sports


IMPEACH OBAMA!
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 11:34 AM   #8
pavyracer
Aston Villa
 
pavyracer's Avatar
Joined: 04-12-07
Posts: 22,773
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

Bears will not lose by double digits on MNF. I'll take the points any time. Line should have been -4 max. I don't know what Vegas is thinking here. These are the Vikings not the Pats. They are just an injury away from being awful. If Peterson or Jackson get hurt during the game they have noone to carry the load. Another bet I like is under. Teams that are looking to go into the playoffs play conservatively to just get the win.
__________________
Dr. Bob is a square
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 12:00 PM   #9
xxxvince
 
xxxvince's Avatar
Joined: 12-17-07
Posts: 1,051
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

just check vikings rushing yard record for this season and how much bears ranks in giving up rushing yards.

no brainer here.. vikings GO VIKINGS GOOOOO

spread is too high? who does bears have to score beside devin hester? plus with a new qb who loves to throw td.. second string rb.. AP CLONE.. one of the worse defense this year.. YEAH BOTTOM LOWER RANKED BEARS.. always been over rated.

GO VIKINGS GO!
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 12:27 PM   #10
babaoriley
 
babaoriley's Avatar
Joined: 12-11-06
Posts: 2,297
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

6.5 point teaser sounds mighty nice here. Bears +17 and the Under of 49.5.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 12:30 PM   #11
KCRams
 
KCRams's Avatar
Default Best bet is...

Quote:
Originally Posted by buztah View Post
Happyboy, I hear ya. I just can't lay 10 1/2 and I can't trust ther bears with a 10 1/2 lead either. Pass.
the OVER 43 as the Vikes are averaging as of late almost 35 pts per game and the Bears are giving up around 27 pts. I'm not real confident either way on the spread also, so I'll leave it alone.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 12:30 PM   #12
Illusion
 
Illusion's Avatar
Joined: 08-09-05
Posts: 22,624
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

Nathan Vasher is expected to see his first action in 10 weeks for the Bears tonight.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 12:46 PM   #13
pavyracer
Aston Villa
 
pavyracer's Avatar
Joined: 04-12-07
Posts: 22,773
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxvince View Post
just check vikings rushing yard record for this season and how much bears ranks in giving up rushing yards.

no brainer here.. vikings GO VIKINGS GOOOOO

spread is too high? who does bears have to score beside devin hester? plus with a new qb who loves to throw td.. second string rb.. AP CLONE.. one of the worse defense this year.. YEAH BOTTOM LOWER RANKED BEARS.. always been over rated.

GO VIKINGS GO!
When was the last time Bears lost with double digits in their own division kiddo?
__________________
Dr. Bob is a square
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 12:55 PM   #14
cashflow50
 
cashflow50's Avatar
Joined: 01-23-07
Posts: 124
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

minny -6 1st half. money$$$$
__________________
Horseshoe = Good Luck
-----------------------------
!!BETtor come STRONG or dont come at all!!
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 12:56 PM   #15
buztah
 
buztah's Avatar
Joined: 03-23-07
Posts: 6,541
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

OK, decided to go ahead and play this. I'm taking the under. I expect the Bears to put a lot of men up front with determination to stop the run. I think Smith will basically say to the Vikings that you will have to beat us in the air but not on the ground. I don't see the bears scoring a lot of points. 2 units on the under here. I am picturing a final score of 17-9 or so.
__________________
True Lion Sports


IMPEACH OBAMA!
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 01:58 PM   #16
Bet Locks Only
 
Bet Locks Only's Avatar
Default

I like Vikings to cover 10 1/2 and the over at 43
I am teasing vikings -4 and over at 37 1/2 also
vikings to good last meeting peterson ran for 225 against a healthy bears defense know a banged up defense come on it is easy! vikings also get some defensive lineman back plus a cb back to make them even better! orton is good for at least 1 int and the vikings lead the nfl in pick 6's!
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 02:02 PM   #17
buztah
 
buztah's Avatar
Joined: 03-23-07
Posts: 6,541
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

Nothing is ever easy in this game. Don't be surprised if the Bears even win. Not probable but quite possible. This could be a dog fight if Lovy stuffs the box and forces the Vikes to rely on passing. I expect a relatively low scoring affair.
__________________
True Lion Sports


IMPEACH OBAMA!
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 02:06 PM   #18
Bet Locks Only
 
Bet Locks Only's Avatar
Default

what you dont think they did that last time after peterson rushed for over 100 in the first half they did stuff the box and he came back in the 2nd half and rushed for over another 100! come on it is not just him it is there line they are very good at running and stopping the run! vikings in a blowout but i will not bet the over cause i think bears get shut out!
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 02:10 PM   #19
jackpot269
 
jackpot269's Avatar
Joined: 09-24-07
Posts: 2,721
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

Bad day again yesterday no sense in missing out on another chance to lose some more money. That said Im on the viks big & thinking maybe on the over small . gl to everyone. Remember if you can not afford it don't play it.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 02:12 PM   #20
outdrawed
 
outdrawed's Avatar
Joined: 11-21-07
Posts: 388
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

Bears and the under.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 03:21 PM   #21
ertl09
 
ertl09's Avatar
Joined: 12-10-07
Posts: 1,219
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

did you guys forget about AP last week? This guy is human and you can't expect him to go +200 yards. Yeah I Know Minnesota is playing well but can you really take them for real? The only team I give them props for beating is San Diego. Look for Chicago to open up the playbook and let Orton pass it around, while on D the bears main focus will be stopping the run. The last time these 2 teams played the Viks won by 3 points, and AP ran for 200 + yds... and they still kept it close. MY prediction is that the Bears will keep it close if not have a shot to win this game. Also on the Under. Not a bad idea to tease it to +17 1/2 and under 49 1/2
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 03:31 PM   #22
Louisvillekid1
 
Louisvillekid1's Avatar
Joined: 10-17-07
Posts: 4,469
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

This one is easy fellas,

Bears want to run the football and the vikes are the best in the league at stopping them. They will become one sided by throwing the ball way more then they want too. Vikes will pound the ball right at the Bears Defense which is just not any good any more. Then they will get some big plays Off PA after Chicago has to put 8 in the box. Also T Jackson will be able to scramble when needed , they will not be able to use B Urlacher as a spy on him, because L Smith will have him focused on AP and C Taylor all night.

It's a ton a points to give to a divisional rival on a monday night however, and history would tell you to take this much points in a second. However as Happy Boy said this NFL year is different most high point spreads i ever seen. With all that being said IF YOU MUST MAKE A PLAY ON TONIGHTS GAME, lay the wood. Minnesota controls their own destiny, and Chicago has nothing to play for at this point. L Smith is evaluated talent as of now, and he is going to try some new things with some new personal to help them grow for next year.

Minnesota 27 - 9 . . .
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 03:35 PM   #23
Louisvillekid1
 
Louisvillekid1's Avatar
Joined: 10-17-07
Posts: 4,469
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by babaoriley View Post
6.5 point teaser sounds mighty nice here. Bears +17 and the Under of 49.5.

Looks pretty good, however did you consider Minn - 4.5 and over 37?
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 03:41 PM   #24
outdrawed
 
outdrawed's Avatar
Joined: 11-21-07
Posts: 388
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

Stop with all this teaser talk, especially with teasing to 17.5, and the total. You are not 50% more likely to cover a spread teasing from 10.5 to 17.5 or teasing from 43 to 49.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 04:28 PM   #25
Bet Locks Only
 
Bet Locks Only's Avatar
Exclamation

Fellows if the man him self says the vikings cover the 11 points i am going with him all day "that sounds nice doesnt it! by the way the man is brandon lang you might of heard the movie made about him "two for the money" and he is making a huge play on the vikings (about $400,000) so follow him! i got 2 G's on the vikings and i am down -8 units for the weekend! lang is gonna pull me out of the hole and some!
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 04:30 PM   #26
Bet Locks Only
 
Bet Locks Only's Avatar
Default

by the way vasher is questionable and that usually mean he is out! he did not practice friday!80% of time the player does not go!
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 04:35 PM   #27
pavyracer
Aston Villa
 
pavyracer's Avatar
Joined: 04-12-07
Posts: 22,773
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

God told me Bears +10.5. I listened.
__________________
Dr. Bob is a square
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 04:42 PM   #28
Bet Locks Only
 
Bet Locks Only's Avatar
Default

man you should not say shit like that you justed cursed yourself i cant believe you would say that have a good time losing!
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 04:44 PM   #29
outdrawed
 
outdrawed's Avatar
Joined: 11-21-07
Posts: 388
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bet Locks Only View Post
man you should not say shit like that you justed cursed yourself i cant believe you would say that have a good time losing!
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 05:08 PM   #30
Dark Horse
Steelers Over
 
Dark Horse's Avatar
Joined: 12-14-05
Posts: 9,024
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

My main angle for this game is 48-17 in favor of the dog.

This is choke city for the Vikings. So far they've played free of worries, carefree like young dogs. Not anymore. Tonight they face a Bears teams, with a solid QB (not much tape on the guy!), wondering why the hell they're a DD dog. Go back five years and see how often the Bears have lost ATS when dogged by 10 or more pts. This is Peterson hype, and he already had a great game against Chicago. Pride kicking in for the Bears.

Chicago +10.5 and CHI ML

Last edited by Dark Horse; 12-17-07 at 05:11 PM..
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 05:11 PM   #31
jayz00
 
jayz00's Avatar
Joined: 12-13-07
Posts: 106
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

All the books know that your coming for the vikes in this I see no value in the vikes -10 1/2......... I see it as me being priced out of it I like the over in this game.... If the vikes control this game wich they should. I cant see them care too much about giving up a few early or late 6 pointers to the crap bears offence... overs for me
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 05:16 PM   #32
outdrawed
 
outdrawed's Avatar
Joined: 11-21-07
Posts: 388
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

back five years and see how often the Bears have lost ATS when dogged by 10 or more pts.

6 times since 2002-03. 4-2 ATS. In other words, highly inconclusive and completely irrelevant.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 05:35 PM   #33
Dark Horse
Steelers Over
 
Dark Horse's Avatar
Joined: 12-14-05
Posts: 9,024
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

First of all, the present group never got a dog tag of more than one TD in the last two years. They know tonight's spread, and will likely consider it an insult.

Going back further:
2004 at MIN (!): CHI +11 loses 22-27 (W)
2003 at DEN: CHI +10.5 wins 19-10 (W)
2003 at SEA: CHI +11 loses 17-24 (W)
2002 at MIA: CHI +10 loses 9-27 (L)
2002 at STL: CHI +10.5 loses 16-21 (W)

Quite relevant, because it reflects on the team culture. Not a single ATS loss when dogged by more than 10 pts.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 05:39 PM   #34
LT Profits
 
LT Profits's Avatar
Joined: 10-27-06
Posts: 19,335
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pavyracer View Post
When was the last time Bears lost with double digits in their own division kiddo?
3 of the last 5 times they played in Minnesota! 34-10, 24-13, 25-7.

That said, the Bears ARE 4-1 ATS as double-digit underdogs.

All of this aside, I am passing on this game. If I had a gun to my head, I would lean to Bears and Under, but I see better betting opportunities in other sports tonight.
__________________
It is time to turn MLB 2009 around to keep my streak of consecutive winning seasons in ALL Sports alive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by clonecat View Post
LT, I will be impressed if you make it to the black this season. I highly doubt you do, but wish you the best. 20 units is a lot to make up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by donjuan View Post
I may disagree with LT from time to time, but he's not a tard.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-17-07, 05:40 PM   #35
area51steve
 
area51steve's Avatar
Joined: 06-01-07
Posts: 726
 
Message Me
Challenge Me
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Horse View Post
First of all, the present group never got a dog tag of more than one TD in the last two years. They know tonight's spread, and will likely consider it an insult.

Going back further:
2004 at MIN (!): CHI +11 loses 22-27 (W)
2003 at DEN: CHI +10.5 wins 19-10 (W)
2003 at SEA: CHI +11 loses 17-24 (W)
2002 at MIA: CHI +10 loses 9-27 (L)
2002 at STL: CHI +10.5 loses 16-21 (W)

Quite relevant, because it reflects on the team culture. Not a single ATS loss when dogged by more than 10 pts.
Bears +11 easy money
Quick reply to this message
 


SBR Featured Videos

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 AM.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33