 |
View New Posts |
July Contests
10 Friday
11 Saturday
14 Tuesday
15 Wednesday
16 Thursday
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
10-28-06, 05:49 AM
|
#1 | ||||
|
These plays will go 3-1 Now guess which one will lose?
Chicago -15.5
KC -4 NO -1 SD -9 Which one will lose? Let's see who is right... |
||||
|
|
10-28-06, 08:19 AM
|
#2 | ||||
|
San Diego
|
||||
|
|
|
10-28-06, 08:38 AM
|
#3 | ||||
|
I think Chicago but maybe KC as well
 NO is a lock and I like SD too. |
||||
|
|
|
10-28-06, 09:18 AM
|
#4 | |||||
|
Quote:
Who is the QB for KC????? That game was looking good, but now Huard might not start???? NO is no lock either, the only game I like this week is not even on this list....CAROLINA. They are at home -5 against a team that has an issue at QB........Romo at QB in a hostile environment, they are going to be in his face all day. |
|||||
|
|
|
10-28-06, 10:23 AM
|
#5 | ||||
|
The Chiefs.
Just to much going on in that game with injuries, on both sides of the ball. Its a toss up type game. |
||||
|
|
|
10-28-06, 12:22 PM
|
#6 | ||||
|
SD aint covering NO 9 pts i can tell everyone that right now. STL just won the world series and i bet they are hyped up more than ever. there going into SD and they sure as hell dont want to loose this week.
i think STL will win straight out. |
||||
|
|
|
10-28-06, 12:26 PM
|
#7 | ||||
|
I think SD is the only one I would take...the rest IDK maybe NO won't win
|
||||
|
|
|
10-28-06, 04:36 PM
|
#8 | ||||
|
I think we're looking at 2-2 with those picks.
|
||||
|
|
|
10-28-06, 04:36 PM
|
#9 | ||||
|
Hopefully one of the first two, because I'm liking both of the last two.
|
||||
|
|
|
10-28-06, 07:08 PM
|
#10 | ||||
|
I am lovin' KC this weekend.
|
||||
|
|
|
10-28-06, 07:46 PM
|
#11 | ||||
|
I think the Rams will cover with ease on Sunday.
|
||||
|
|
|
10-28-06, 08:50 PM
|
#12 | ||||
|
If CHI's backdoor is open with more of a football number like
16 (which is where the majority of SBR-listed books currently have it), then I'll say hopefully SF, because, like Razz, I'm liking the last 2 and though I'm not wagering on NO, I love 'La Law: Peyton, Brees, McCallister and Bush'. |
||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 03:38 PM
|
#13 | ||||
|
If someone can figure out how I came up with these plays you are one sharp phucker...
These plays are 2-1 so far and SD is up by 14... |
||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 04:01 PM
|
#14 | ||||
|
I hope you do go 3-1 because I ended up taking SD. Also took Den -3
|
||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 04:08 PM
|
#15 | ||||
|
I didn't bet these games.. I was just doing an experiment..
|
||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 04:12 PM
|
#16 | |||||
|
Quote:
Plays I nearly made and didn't pits -9.5 playing hopless bears -15.5 poo giants/tampa under 3 poo why are denver not running?? Pound those Colts |
|||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 08:17 PM
|
#17 | |||||
|
Quote:
that's quite a switch....going from the rams covering with ease to then going to san diego |
|||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 08:21 PM
|
#18 | ||||
|
I thought only touts switched there plays like that
 |
||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 08:22 PM
|
#19 | ||||
|
These plays went 3-1 like I knew they would...
Well I'll post these fades next week too... Yes thats right I am fading someone who is clueless in picking winners.. HAHA!! |
||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 08:23 PM
|
#20 | |||||
|
Quote:
 Thanks for posting IMG.  |
|||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 08:25 PM
|
#21 | |||||
|
Quote:
Nothing wrong with fading anyone bro. Hell, When I'm on a cold streak i'll do that from time to time myself. BTW, Who you fading anyways if you don't mind me asking? (pm me if you don't wanna post it publicly) |
|||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 08:34 PM
|
#22 | ||||
|
Let me know too img...I have someone in mind.
|
||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 08:50 PM
|
#23 | |||||
|
Quote:
Whatever your personal opinion of him you really do need to come to terms with the fact that this is in fact what he does for a living.
__________________
|
|||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 08:52 PM
|
#24 | |||||
|
Quote:
|
|||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 08:55 PM
|
#25 | |||||
|
Quote:
|
|||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 08:57 PM
|
#26 | ||||
|
They were fades of his BTP entries.
__________________
|
||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 09:05 PM
|
#27 | ||||
|
Ganch nailed it, here they are:
409 San Francisco 49ers +16½ X 413 Seattle Seahawks +6 415 Baltimore Ravens +2 417 St. Louis Rams +9 |
||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 09:14 PM
|
#28 | |||||
|
Quote:
|
|||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 10:06 PM
|
#29 | |||||
|
Quote:
If you don't like a particular bettor's set of picks it's perfectly reasonable to say so. However, using those picks as a thinly veiled excuse for an ad hominem attack should be beneath you as both an individual and as a professional gambler.
__________________
|
|||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 10:08 PM
|
#30 | ||||
|
You are right Ganchrow..
|
||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 10:54 PM
|
#31 | ||||
|
i agree
i don't think it's cool to go around gloating about fading people (unless it's a tout) especially if you had a good week and they had a bad week cause i'm sure if the roles were reversed you wouldn't want it thrown in your face |
||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 11:00 PM
|
#32 | ||||
|
Looks like IMG maned up and realized. Very nice IMG.
|
||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 11:04 PM
|
#33 | |||||
|
Quote:
I concur looker  |
|||||
|
|
|
10-29-06, 11:06 PM
|
#34 | |||||
|
Quote:
very nice would be an apology |
|||||
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 PM.
