 |
View New Posts |
July Contests
06 Monday
07 Tuesday
09 Thursday
11 Saturday
15 Wednesday
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
11-30-2008, 03:59 PM
|
#1 | ||||
|
Are the Raiders serious?
Anyone see what happened, AHAHAHHAHA
  |
||||
|
|
11-30-2008, 04:00 PM
|
#2 | ||||
|
The Oracle
|
what happened?
__________________
Who Dat Gonna Beat Dem Saints?! |
||||
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 04:01 PM
|
#3 | ||||
|
They are going to kick a FG on the KC 25 yard line, then they muff the snap and KC returns it 60+ yards for a TD
|
||||
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 04:15 PM
|
#4 | ||||
|
The Oracle
|
Sounds like the Raiders to me...
__________________
Who Dat Gonna Beat Dem Saints?! |
||||
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 04:19 PM
|
#5 | ||||
|
Yup, once again there in KC territory and go for it on 4th and 3, instead of kicking the FG (incomplete pass)
|
||||
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 04:33 PM
|
#6 | ||||
|
lol good old raiders now my cincy ML play is looking great
|
||||
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 04:34 PM
|
#7 | ||||
|
The Oracle
|
Al Davis needs to sell
__________________
Who Dat Gonna Beat Dem Saints?! |
||||
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 04:39 PM
|
#8 | ||||
|
Al Davis always sale the game to the highest bidder. That's why he would not allow the head coach complete control of the team.
|
||||
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 04:41 PM
|
#9 | ||||
|
The Oracle
|
Thats true.. I agree
__________________
Who Dat Gonna Beat Dem Saints?! |
||||
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 04:42 PM
|
#10 | ||||
|
Are the Raiders going to be favored in the 2H? If they are, I'm taking KC.
|
||||
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 07:49 PM
|
#11 | |||||
|
It was worse than that. It was a fake. The holder took the snap, and snapped the ball between his legs to Janakowski, who muffed it and the Chiefs ran it back for a TD. Even is Janakowski made the catch, he would have been tackled for a loss. It was 4th and 10.
Raiders would have gone up 6-3 against a terrible Chiefs offense. That play basically gave them the lead and momentum. Quote:
|
|||||
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 07:53 PM
|
#12 | ||||
|
i wonder what the raiders will be ranked in the new bcs standings?? below Univ. of Wash?
|
||||
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 07:56 PM
|
#13 | ||||||
|
Quote:
Muffed snap would have been acceptable, mistakes happen. Calling a fake FG on 4th and 10, at home, against a team that you are capable of beating, early in the game, instead of taking the 6 - 3 lead? I've been a Raiders fan all my life and have seen plenty of stupid shit, but I hadn't been that furious since the tuck rule.
__________________
MLB Spreadsheet MLB Season: 71-80-2 (-9.41 Units) 7/10-7/12: 0-6-0 (-6.18 Units) 4/28-5/05: 2-11-1 (-9.65 Units) Nothing kills a season like brutal cold streaks... Quote:
|
||||||
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 08:56 PM
|
#14 | ||||
|
How about the next trip, chance to kick a 40-yard FG to make it 10-6 and they go for the end zone.
I had the Chiefs, and the Raiders gave this game away. |
||||
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 09:02 PM
|
#15 | ||||
|
It pains me to say it because i'm from the Bay Area, but the Raiders are a complete joke and will continue to be until Al is 6ft deep.
|
||||
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 09:03 PM
|
#16 | ||||
|
LOL, I didnt watch the game on CBS sportsline it just said muffed snap...??
Either way, AHHAHAHA The Raiders are sad. |
||||
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 09:04 PM
|
#17 | ||||
|
did anyone see their 70 yard FG attempt a couple weeks ago?
|
||||
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:51 PM.
