[hello]

MINNESOTA (Home)-10.5
OVER 43.5

[Illusion]

I am leaning heavily towards the Vikings in this one.

[EGGY6199]

WOW I am going to bet the Bears here. The Vikings are not that good.

4-1 on the ML is a real price
The Viks play in a dome don't they so the weather won't be a factor.... and the bears play real well away.

Bears 4-1 1 units
Bears +10.5 5 units
Over 5 units

[jtnguyen79]

all i know is vikings are much better than the sorry bears......worst mistake was getting rid of Thomas Jones for fumbling cedric benson


go Vikings!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a sorry team that made superbowl last year........huge disappointment

away record for Bears 3-4 that makes them play well?? 3-4 ATS away too while Minnesota is 4-2 at home and 4-2 ATS......I mean spread is a little high this week but come on chicago has given up already....this game will be similar to what Tampa Bay did to Atlanta on sunday.

good luck everyone

[patsfan2727]

bigboydan voted for all 4 options.
HE'S A GUARANTEED WINNER!

[HAPPY BOY]

Im never seen an NFL year with so many double digit lines. fvcking Nfl is turning into the ncaa with these spreads. Sad part is Im scared to take the points.

[buztah]

Happyboy, I hear ya. I just can't lay 10 1/2 and I can't trust ther bears with a 10 1/2 lead either. Pass.

[pavyracer]

Bears will not lose by double digits on MNF. I'll take the points any time. Line should have been -4 max. I don't know what Vegas is thinking here. These are the Vikings not the Pats. They are just an injury away from being awful. If Peterson or Jackson get hurt during the game they have noone to carry the load. Another bet I like is under. Teams that are looking to go into the playoffs play conservatively to just get the win.

[xxxvince]

just check vikings rushing yard record for this season and how much bears ranks in giving up rushing yards.

no brainer here.. vikings GO VIKINGS GOOOOO

spread is too high? who does bears have to score beside devin hester? plus with a new qb who loves to throw td.. second string rb.. AP CLONE.. one of the worse defense this year.. YEAH BOTTOM LOWER RANKED BEARS.. always been over rated.

GO VIKINGS GO!

[babaoriley]

6.5 point teaser sounds mighty nice here. Bears +17 and the Under of 49.5.

[KCRams]

Happyboy, I hear ya. I just can't lay 10 1/2 and I can't trust ther bears with a 10 1/2 lead either. Pass.

the OVER 43 as the Vikes are averaging as of late almost 35 pts per game and the Bears are giving up around 27 pts. I'm not real confident either way on the spread also, so I'll leave it alone.

[Illusion]

Nathan Vasher is expected to see his first action in 10 weeks for the Bears tonight.

[pavyracer]

just check vikings rushing yard record for this season and how much bears ranks in giving up rushing yards.

no brainer here.. vikings GO VIKINGS GOOOOO

spread is too high? who does bears have to score beside devin hester? plus with a new qb who loves to throw td.. second string rb.. AP CLONE.. one of the worse defense this year.. YEAH BOTTOM LOWER RANKED BEARS.. always been over rated.

GO VIKINGS GO!

When was the last time Bears lost with double digits in their own division kiddo?

[cashflow50]

minny -6 1st half. money$$$$

[buztah]

OK, decided to go ahead and play this. I'm taking the under. I expect the Bears to put a lot of men up front with determination to stop the run. I think Smith will basically say to the Vikings that you will have to beat us in the air but not on the ground. I don't see the bears scoring a lot of points. 2 units on the under here. I am picturing a final score of 17-9 or so.

[buztah]

Nothing is ever easy in this game. Don't be surprised if the Bears even win. Not probable but quite possible. This could be a dog fight if Lovy stuffs the box and forces the Vikes to rely on passing. I expect a relatively low scoring affair.

[jackpot269]

Bad day again yesterday no sense in missing out on another chance to lose some more money. That said Im on the viks big & thinking maybe on the over small . gl to everyone. Remember if you can not afford it don't play it.

[outdrawed]

Bears and the under.

[ertl09]

did you guys forget about AP last week? This guy is human and you can't expect him to go +200 yards. Yeah I Know Minnesota is playing well but can you really take them for real? The only team I give them props for beating is San Diego. Look for Chicago to open up the playbook and let Orton pass it around, while on D the bears main focus will be stopping the run. The last time these 2 teams played the Viks won by 3 points, and AP ran for 200 + yds... and they still kept it close. MY prediction is that the Bears will keep it close if not have a shot to win this game. Also on the Under. Not a bad idea to tease it to +17 1/2 and under 49 1/2

[outdrawed]

Stop with all this teaser talk, especially with teasing to 17.5, and the total. You are not 50% more likely to cover a spread teasing from 10.5 to 17.5 or teasing from 43 to 49.

[pavyracer]

God told me Bears +10.5. I listened.

[outdrawed]

man you should not say shit like that you justed cursed yourself i cant believe you would say that have a good time losing!

[Dark Horse]

My main angle for this game is 48-17 in favor of the dog.

This is choke city for the Vikings. So far they've played free of worries, carefree like young dogs. Not anymore. Tonight they face a Bears teams, with a solid QB (not much tape on the guy!), wondering why the hell they're a DD dog. Go back five years and see how often the Bears have lost ATS when dogged by 10 or more pts. This is Peterson hype, and he already had a great game against Chicago. Pride kicking in for the Bears.

Chicago +10.5 and CHI ML

[jayz00]

All the books know that your coming for the vikes in this I see no value in the vikes -10 1/2......... I see it as me being priced out of it I like the over in this game.... If the vikes control this game wich they should. I cant see them care too much about giving up a few early or late 6 pointers to the crap bears offence... overs for me

[outdrawed]

back five years and see how often the Bears have lost ATS when dogged by 10 or more pts.

6 times since 2002-03. 4-2 ATS. In other words, highly inconclusive and completely irrelevant.

[Dark Horse]

First of all, the present group never got a dog tag of more than one TD in the last two years. They know tonight's spread, and will likely consider it an insult.

Going back further:
2004 at MIN (!): CHI +11 loses 22-27 (W)
2003 at DEN: CHI +10.5 wins 19-10 (W)
2003 at SEA: CHI +11 loses 17-24 (W)
2002 at MIA: CHI +10 loses 9-27 (L)
2002 at STL: CHI +10.5 loses 16-21 (W)

Quite relevant, because it reflects on the team culture. Not a single ATS loss when dogged by more than 10 pts.

[LT Profits]

When was the last time Bears lost with double digits in their own division kiddo?

3 of the last 5 times they played in Minnesota! 34-10, 24-13, 25-7.

That said, the Bears ARE 4-1 ATS as double-digit underdogs.

All of this aside, I am passing on this game. If I had a gun to my head, I would lean to Bears and Under, but I see better betting opportunities in other sports tonight.

[area51steve]

First of all, the present group never got a dog tag of more than one TD in the last two years. They know tonight's spread, and will likely consider it an insult.

Going back further:
2004 at MIN (!): CHI +11 loses 22-27 (W)
2003 at DEN: CHI +10.5 wins 19-10 (W)
2003 at SEA: CHI +11 loses 17-24 (W)
2002 at MIA: CHI +10 loses 9-27 (L)
2002 at STL: CHI +10.5 loses 16-21 (W)

Quite relevant, because it reflects on the team culture. Not a single ATS loss when dogged by more than 10 pts.

Bears +11 easy money