[wageringblog]

copied/pasted from bodog:

4:15pGame can be seen on FOX PreviewMatchupInjuries 321 Dallas Cowboys +3 (-155)
- 35 (-110)o
(-110)u
-
322 Washington Redskins -3 (+135)
- -


-155 for Dallas??!?!?!? Who on EARTH would seriously take those odds?

I know I generally lean towards dogs in NFL, and I know books tend to adjust odds for individuals based on their betting patterns, but seriously... -155??? Seems a bit extreme to me...

[spanky]

seems like they are scared to move off 3 for some reason.all other books are down to 1 or pic.

[maritime]

Dallas moneyline is solid pick. But Bodog often won't post moneylines for games with tight spreads. This is a significant negative for me with betting at Bodog.

[bigboydan]

i noticed this line there last night at washington -3 "-135" .... and needless to say i was shocked over that one. because, i noticed even last night that pinny and cris had the game at 1.5

[onlooker]

That game is down to Washington -1 and some have Dallas -1 out here.

[slacker00]

copied/pasted from bodog:

4:15pGame can be seen on FOX PreviewMatchupInjuries 321 Dallas Cowboys +3 (-155)
- 35 (-110)o
(-110)u
-
322 Washington Redskins -3 (+135)
- -


-155 for Dallas??!?!?!? Who on EARTH would seriously take those odds?

I know I generally lean towards dogs in NFL, and I know books tend to adjust odds for individuals based on their betting patterns, but seriously... -155??? Seems a bit extreme to me...

This line basically translates to PK -110 for either side, which is about where the line was at right before kickoff.

I see some books hanging funky lines like these during the week. Why don't they stick to the -110 standard whenever possible? Once lines start dangling at -120/+100, it's time to move the line.